ISSUE-170: Definition of and what/whether limitations around data append and first parties

Definition of and what/whether limitations around data append and first parties

State:
PENDING REVIEW
Product:
Compliance Current
Raised by:
Opened on:
2012-10-03
Description:
Note change proposal: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_First_Party_Compliance
Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. Batch closing of old issues (from [email protected] on 2015-03-24)
  2. Results for ISSUE-170: CfO on Data Append (from [email protected] on 2014-10-22)
  3. No TPWG call July 2, CFO on ISSUE-170 response postponed to July 9 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-25)
  4. RE: issure-219 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-25)
  5. RE: ISSUE-219 (context separation) (from [email protected] on 2014-06-24)
  6. Re: Announcement of Calls for Objections on ISSUE-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-20)
  7. Re: Announcement of Calls for Objections on ISSUE-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-19)
  8. Announcement of Calls for Objections on ISSUE-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-18)
  9. Agenda for June 18 TPWG call (from [email protected] on 2014-06-17)
  10. issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-11)
  11. Re: Agenda for June 11 TPWG call (from [email protected] on 2014-06-10)
  12. Agenda for June 11 TPWG call (from [email protected] on 2014-06-09)
  13. RE: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-09)
  14. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-07)
  15. RE: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-06)
  16. RE: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-06)
  17. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-06)
  18. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-06)
  19. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-06)
  20. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-05)
  21. issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-05)
  22. issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  23. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  24. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  25. RE: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  26. RE: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  27. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  28. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  29. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  30. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  31. RE: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  32. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  33. issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  34. Re: issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  35. issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  36. RE: Issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  37. Re: Issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-04)
  38. Re: Issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-03)
  39. Re: Issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-03)
  40. Re: Issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-03)
  41. Re: Issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-03)
  42. Re: Issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-06-03)
  43. Agenda for June 4 TPWG call (from [email protected] on 2014-06-02)
  44. Issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2014-05-30)
  45. Cancelled: May 28 TPWG call (from [email protected] on 2014-05-27)
  46. Re: Agenda for May 21 TPWG call (from [email protected] on 2014-05-21)
  47. RE: Agenda for May 21 TPWG call (from [email protected] on 2014-05-21)
  48. ISSUE-170: Data Append and First Parties (from [email protected] on 2014-05-21)
  49. Re: Agenda for May 21 TPWG call (from [email protected] on 2014-05-20)
  50. Agenda for May 21 TPWG call (from [email protected] on 2014-05-19)
  51. TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V01) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-09)
  52. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-09)
  53. Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (from [email protected] on 2013-10-09)
  54. Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (from [email protected] on 2013-10-09)
  55. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-08)
  56. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-08)
  57. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-07)
  58. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-07)
  59. TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-07)
  60. Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-03)
  61. TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-03)
  62. Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (from [email protected] on 2013-10-03)
  63. Change proposal First Party Compliance issue-170 (from [email protected] on 2013-10-02)
  64. TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V02) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-02)
  65. RE: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-01)
  66. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-01)
  67. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-01)
  68. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-01)
  69. RE: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-01)
  70. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-01)
  71. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-01)
  72. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-01)
  73. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-01)
  74. RE: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-10-01)
  75. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-30)
  76. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-30)
  77. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-30)
  78. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-30)
  79. Compliance document updates for review before next WD publication (was CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-28)
  80. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-27)
  81. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-27)
  82. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-27)
  83. Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-24)
  84. New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-24)
  85. Agenda for the Sept 25 call (V01) (from [email protected] on 2013-09-24)
  86. Re: Change proposal -- First Party Compliance -- Issue 170 (from [email protected] on 2013-06-22)
  87. Re: Change proposal -- First Party Compliance -- Issue 170 (from [email protected] on 2013-06-21)
  88. Re: June Draft of the DNT compliance spec (from [email protected] on 2013-06-17)
  89. Re: June Draft of the DNT compliance spec (from [email protected] on 2013-06-13)
  90. Agenda for May 22 call (from [email protected] on 2013-05-21)
  91. issue and action cleanup proposals (from [email protected] on 2013-05-15)
  92. Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from [email protected] on 2013-05-07)
  93. Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from [email protected] on 2013-05-07)
  94. ISSUE-170: Definition of and what/whether limitations around data append (from [email protected] on 2012-10-03)

Related notes:

[npdoty]: see action-229

3 Oct 2012, 09:58:30

[npdoty]: let's come back to this issue after we've made decisions around service providers

3 Oct 2012, 09:58:58

ISSUE-154 depends on this definition.

Definition of service providers is ISSUE-49.

Thomas Roessler, 10 Nov 2012, 18:00:31

Opened during issue cleanup. We have alternate proposals on this issue, regarding data append and limitations on first parties.

Nick Doty, 29 May 2013, 01:33:33

[kulick]: Definition of and what/whether limitations around data append and first parties

9 Oct 2013, 17:27:15

Revision here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking-commit/2014Oct/0001.html

Not just a copy/paste because the editor's draft is using different phrasing to be consistent about terminology including "user action", parties to a user action and "context".

Nick Doty, 1 Oct 2014, 06:56:29

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <[email protected]>.
$Id: 170.html,v 1.1 2019/02/01 09:32:32 vivien Exp $