Coalition, Inc.’s Post

View organization page for Coalition, Inc., graphic

39,470 followers

There has been much debate over whether a federal cyber insurance backstop should exist in case of a catastrophic cyber event. Sezaneh Seymour, Ph.D., VP and Head of Regulatory Risk and Policy, offers her opinion on the nuances that should exist in a federal backstop to cover cyber physical incidents that are not covered by property or cyber policies — all while avoiding the transfer of the financial consequences to taxpayers. Explore her point of view in Business Insurance.

Perspectives: A cyber catastrophe requires a bespoke insurance approach - Business Insurance

Perspectives: A cyber catastrophe requires a bespoke insurance approach - Business Insurance

businessinsurance.com

Barry Rabkin

Begun work on my 2nd book. This one is focused on insurance and cyber. 1st book: “Stone Tablets to Satellites: The Continual Intimate but Awkward Relationship Between the Insurance Industry and Technology".

2w

I have a hard time with the argument about moral hazard. There is moral hazard present in every insurance line of business. I also have a hard time when an insurance carrier makes an argument about a federal backstop: the fox wants to keep guarding the hen house. Great example of talking within an echo chamber, though. Cyber risks are entirely different than any other risks the insurance industry has experienced in its extremely long history. Cyber risks should be backstopped by the Federal Government… even if doing that totally removes a premium stream from incumbent and startup insurers and their brokers.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics