@xavidop thanks for getting back to me. The error is below followed by a larger sample of code.
LinkedIn
Twitter
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Fractions"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Alright! Let's talk about fractions. Imagine you have a delicious pizza cut into 4 equal slices. If you eat one slice, you've eaten 1 out of the 4 slices. This is what we call a fraction! Now, I'm curious, have you ever learned about fractions before? Can you tell me what you know about them?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Its portions"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Exactly right! Fractions are a way to talk about parts of a whole, like portions of a pizza. If you think about the pizza example, the fraction 1/4 means 1 portion out of 4 equal portions of the whole pizza. Let's explore a bit more. If you had 2 slices of that pizza, how would you write that as a fraction?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "2/4"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Exactly, well done! If you have 2 slices out of a whole pizza that's divided into 4 equal slices, the fraction is 2/4. Now, here's something interesting: did you know that 2/4 can also be simplified? Simplifying a fraction means making it smaller but keeping its value the same. Can you think of a simpler way to write 2/4?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "1/2"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Spot on! You've got it! Simplifying 2/4 gives us 1/2, which means exactly the same thing, but it's just a simpler way to say it. This is because both the top number (the numerator) and the bottom number (the denominator) can be divided by 2. Here's a bit of a challenge: Imagine you and a friend have a chocolate bar divided into 8 pieces, and you share it equally. How many pieces does each person get, and how would you write that as a fraction?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "4/8?"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "That's right! If you share 8 pieces of chocolate equally between two people, each person gets 4 pieces. So, you could write that as 4/8 for each person. Now, just like we simplified 2/4 to 1/2, can we simplify 4/8 as well? What simpler fraction would represent the same amount?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "2/4"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "You're on the right track by simplifying it, but there's a step further we can go from 2/4. Remember, when we simplify fractions, we want to make the numbers as small as possible but still keep the same value. So, if we simplify 2/4, what do we get? (Think about how we simplified 2/4 earlier!)"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "1/2"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Exactly right, well done! Just like 2/4 simplifies to 1/2, when you simplify 4/8, it also comes down to 1/2. This shows how different fractions can actually mean the same thing. You're doing brilliantly with these! Ready for another question, or is there another topic you're curious about?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "What is 3/4 x 12/8?"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Alright, let's tackle this one step at a time. When we multiply fractions, we multiply the top numbers (numerators) together and the bottom numbers (denominators) together. So, for 3/4 x 12/8, what do we get if we multiply the numerators (3 and 12) and then the denominators (4 and 😎 separately? Can you try working that out?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "34/32?"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Let's break it down together: To multiply fractions, you multiply the top numbers (numerators) and then multiply the bottom numbers (denominators). So, for (3/4 times 12/8 ), we multiply the numerators together: (3 times 12 = 36 ). Then, we multiply the denominators together: (4 times 8 = 32 ). That gives us (36/32 ). Now, this fraction can be simplified because both the numerator and the denominator can be divided by the same number to make it simpler. What number can both 36 and 32 be divided by to simplify this fraction?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "1"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "It looks like we might have taken a little misstep in simplifying. When simplifying (36/32 ), while it's true that any number can be divided by 1, we usually look for the largest number that divides both the numerator and the denominator to simplify the fraction as much as possible. For (36/32 ), both numbers can be divided by 4. So, if we divide the top and the bottom by 4, what do we get?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "8/7"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Let's double-check the math together: If we simplify (36/32 ) by dividing both the numerator and the denominator by 4, we should do the following calculations: - For the numerator: (36 ÷ 4 = 9 ) - For the denominator: (32 ÷ 4 = 8 ) So, after simplifying, (36/32 ) becomes (9/8 ). This means the simplified form of the multiplication you did is (9/8 ), not (8/7 ). It shows you have a little more than 1 whole, since (8/8 ) would be exactly 1. Does this make sense?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Yes but what is 9/8?"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Great question! A fraction like (9/8 ) is called an improper fraction. This means the top number (numerator) is larger than the bottom number (denominator), so it's more than a whole. To understand (9/8 ), let's think about it as whole pieces and extra parts. For every (8/8 ) (which makes 1 whole), we have (1/8 ) left over when we look at (9/8 ). So, (9/8 ) is the same as saying "1 and 1/8 ". This means if you had 9 slices of a cake that was cut into 8 equal slices, you'd have a whole cake plus another 1/8 of a cake. Does that help clear things up?"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Yes thanks"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "You're welcome! I'm really glad to hear that helped. If you have any more questions, whether it's about fractions or something else, just let me know. I'm here to help!"}]}+1 could you share more on the specific error you are getting ?
I was able to run a tuning job with the sample you shared above.
You can also use something like this to validate if your JSONL format is accurate - https://jsonlines.org/validator/
