JPEG Patent's Single Claim Rejected (And Smacked Down For Good Measure)
from the a-good-first-step dept
We've been covering the ongoing saga of an old patent we've referred to as the "JPEG Patent." This actually isn't the first patent we've called the JPEG Patent, because multiple people claimed to hold patents over the technology that goes into a JPEG image. But, this one was rather special. The patent had been used, repeatedly, by lawyer Ray Niro, against a wide range of opponents, including a patent system critic. The end result was a drawn out review process where all of the original claims were rejected, but a single new claim was added to the patent, which Niro insisted covered JPEGs on a website.Earlier this year, the Patent Office agreed to re-examine that claim. On top of that, a judge overseeing one of the lawsuits involving the patent decided to put the suit on hold pending the outcome of the re-exam. Of course, the re-exam will take some time, but the initial re-exam came out recently and it does not look good for this patent:
Filed Under: jpeg patent, patents, re-exam, rejection
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
As someone who reads a lot of Office Actions, I've never seen a patent examiner spend so many pages trashing a single claim. It could be that the Patent Office assigned its "A-Team" to this patent given its storied history and the high profile treatment it receives from this blog and others.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh....nothing much!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh....nothing much!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oh....nothing much!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh....nothing much!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh....nothing much!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
God, How retarded!
Its used everywhere and just as much as college ruled paper!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: God, How retarded!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: God, How retarded!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
What's with the nonstandard format?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
proofreading/sorry mike
[that "while" should be a "why"]
--Glenn
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
JPEG; Joint Photographic Experts Group
mainly for transmission of photos from space
craft.
I suppose one of the members could have pulled
a rambus and gone after a patent but there was
more integrity in the JPEG group.
They started work about 1987 and the first draft
was released around 1990. Digital Equipment Corp.
was one of the consortium members.
At least that's how I remember it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Retroactive Innovation
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
JPEG viability
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment
Add A Reply