Steward requests/Checkuser/2013-05

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in May 2013, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Asianleag (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sportmaker (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Similar advertising/spamming behavior in fa:شرکت کشت و صنعت ایران برتر, fa:سولیکو, and fa:الگو:سولیکو و کاله which are all related to Kalleh Co. .

Reason(s): Asianleag has recently started to work on the project and has made surprising progress. His interest in sport and Amol, specially in Kalleh Co., is very similar to Sportmaker, who is a well-known suck-puppeteer (See en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی/Archive). I would appreciate if you check for sleeping suck-puppets of Sportmaker too. Taha (talk) 06:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Parsa Amoli (پارسا آملی) is blocked in commons! He is real troll and vandal in any project.--Mehdi^Talk 18:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

On the one hand, the edits of Asianleag and Sportmaker do not overlap, either chronologically (Sportmaker started editing after Asianleg was blocked) or over specific IPs. However, they overlap ranges and their technical evidence is consistent with standard updating of software over time. So I would say that this is Possible based on the technical evidence. As always, behavioral evidence is key in determining sock/meat puppetry. -- Avi (talk) 04:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Taha (talk) 19:47, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

D&[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Luciana S. Santos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Tossan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); João do Telhado (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): I believe the first account belongs to the banned user Diabo e Santo, also known as D&S (see this request for more information), since the user is showing similar behavior, but I'd like to confirm it before taking action. Plase check Luciana S. Santos with these two blocked sockpuppets of D&S. Thanks in advance, Defender (talk) 16:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I'd like to add Liberto (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser) to the list. Defender (talk) 21:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Likely

Tossan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
João do Telhado (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Liberto (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Unrelated

Luciana S. Santos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Stale

D&S (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

-- Avi (talk) 03:53, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Not done

List of users: Arash.pt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Samaksasanian (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Farvartish (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Mehran (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Amir a57 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); ‏طاها (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Amookhteh (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Hello. It is clear that this account is troll, vandal and sock-puppetry but we don't know which account is his main account. Please search all related accounts in Wikipedia. Thanks. Mervzi (talk) 03:17, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Everyone know User:Mervzi in fa.wiki as someone who corrupts articles. He removes all edits by admins. His previous accounts were banned and his current account was banned for 1 week. I don't have any other accounts but like other Iranian Users in Iran, sometimes I have to use proxies to access/login Wiki. Arash.pt (talk) 03:57, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Comment to steward as a non-involved user, this check-user looks fishing to me. All the users mentioned above are active (1000+ edits) users who just oppose the ideology of user:Mervzi. Taha (talk) 04:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done This request is obvious nonsense from a blocked user. --MF-W 04:51, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

I truly believe Arash.pt is a real troll. I was blocked by Mehran after I created this in Meta and I am protesting about his mistake. Please check Arash.pt because we have to know which one is his main account. Thanks--Mervzi (talk) 05:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

User:Mervzi blocked for Wikipedia:No personal attacks and this is the sixth time in five months that he has been blocked !! Arash.pt (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

I really think Arash.pt is related to Mehran or Samaksasanian, because this troll behave similarly to Samaksasanian and also after I created this Request, Mehran blocked me. Please check it quickly.--Mervzi (talk) 05:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

As a non-involved sysop and member of ArbCom (which we had a case about Mervzi recently) I say This user (Mervzi) is a troll and he's doing w:WP:DE and he's violating w:WP:POINT here Amir (talk) 06:51, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

User:Ladsgroup, Mehran and several others are members of a band/mafia of sysops in Persian Wikipedia that help each other in these times and they have been blocked several times by bureaucrats because of their doings. Persian Wikipedia is in a very bad status.--Mervzi (talk) 14:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

That's the joke! Are u OK?--Mehdi^Talk 14:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Not done

List of users: Kolega2357 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 109.92.21.151 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): I want him to personally check and prove myself in the Macedonian Wikipedia community out there that I do not have one of his sockpuppet. And I'm not related to the static IP 109.92.21.151 address that just pulls doubt. Consider this as my personal request --Kolega2357 (talk) 09:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Note: user is blocked on sr.wikipedia as a sockpuppet. --Rs chen 7754 09:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Is there accusation of you being connected to this particular IP to begin with? I don't think so, based on (low-quality) google translation. --Bencmq (talk) 10:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

@Rschen7754: You again but deliberately doing what you're doing is your evil intentions. What does a Serbian Wikipedia and Commons? This is one of your more dirty and sleazy game. --Kolega2357 (talk) 10:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

@Bencmq: I do not use Google translate. I just want to check it out there because it's obvious to me that IP address crashes vote there. --Kolega2357 (talk) 10:14, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Comment I'm not comfortable with doing this request, because CheckUser cannot prove that there is no relation between two users. But I can advise you to request your unblock if you've been only blocked based on suspictions. And by the way, I don't see what's wrong with Rschen's intervention here. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 11:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

@Quentinv57: I not blocked it to prove that I'm not no one there sockpuppet. There have only my bot. See here. --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Closed as Not done, as self-requested CU isn't a good way to 'clear oneself'. Also I don't see sufficient grounds for a check anyway. There has also been communication difficulties when the user approached me. Anyone that speaks this language and willing to help translate would be appreciated. --Bencmq (talk) 12:18, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Nebogipfel (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Redirectionneur Phou (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Nebogipfel's election to Patrol user

Reason(s): Hi ! Nebogipfel open an election page to request the patrol's tools. But Quentinv57 accuse him to be Redirectionneur Phou a renowned vandal on our project. It's quite important because if it's true, we can't entrust the patrol's tools to Nebogipfel, if it's false Nebogipfel shouldn't be assimilated to Redirectionneur Phou. V!v£ l@ Rosière ^{/Murmurer…/} 08:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Comment I did not accuse, I confirmed. Regards, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 11:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

After discussing with Vive la Rosière here, I understand that she didn't know that my "accusation" was made based on a past CU result.

Confirmed Nebogipfel = Redirectionneur Phou

Regards, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

I've checked at the French Wiktionary and found out that Nebogipfel is ocassionally editing 'anonymously' (with his IP address) and then reverting or tagging his own edits with his account. He often created redirect loops or self-redirects: pages with titles like (for example) "5!" and only containing a redirect like "#REDIRECT [[5!]]". Judging by the past behaviour and deleted contributions of Redirectionneur Phou (see for example this deleted page), I'm convinced they're one and the same person. Mathonius (talk) 23:58, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

This is Subordonald (mixing sailors, gsthae with tempo, spiderman electrified). PiRSquared17 (talk) 00:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you all, sorry for the disturbance. I didn't understand he has been already checked before by Quentin. Indeed no doubt can subsist, so Quentin's affirmation during the election was totally valid. My apologizes. V!v£ l@ Rosière ^{/Murmurer…/} 04:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Not done

List of users: Volleyballiran (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); پارسا آملی (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): He (پارسا آملی) is banned troll and vandal in fa.wp , en.wp and commons! He made articles in fa.wp and uploaded images in commons. I think he is suck-poppet of user:پارسا آملی! -- Mehdi^Talk 07:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Stale: both accounts haven't been used recently, so it's not possible to retrieve any information about them using the checkuser tool. Mathonius (talk) 07:45, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

D&[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Liberto (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Virissimo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); GrandeSuro (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Tasqueiro (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Geovana Pereira (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): It seems like the banned user Diabo e Santo aka D&S (see this request for more information) doesn't give up creating socks to disturb us again with poorly done edits and pages for us to fix (yes, he brings some useful material concomitantly with vandalism, so we can't just rollback and delete it all and we use to confunde him with possible newbies in the project; he's a smart vandal, not a vulgar and easy to combat one). Please check if these accounts belong belong to the same user. Virissimo we are 100% sure. Liberto is already confirmed and blocked. I've listed it as a reference. The other accounts we need to confirm before taking action. By the way, it would be good if we could elect local checkusers, but our community is small and we would have to call people from ptwiki and from the other portuguese wikis to vote for us and make an exception to the local voting rules. Is this a good idea? Thanks in advance, Defender (talk) 21:32, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed:

Almotacé
Virissimo
GrandeSuro
Tasqueiro
Liberto
Tossan
João do Telhado
João Capador

Unrelated: Geovana Pereira --Shizhao (talk) 07:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Damavandi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); فلورانس (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Saltanat ebli (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Aliahmad201132 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Similar editions and comments in this AfD and this RFA and this one and also this. it seems they are same persons using various usernames to cheat in votings and elections. very similar editions and comments in articles related to nursing. pls check this , thank you.Tehranpizzaparlor (talk) 10:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Inconclusive Other than they all are editing from the same geopolitical entity, the other technical evidence is inconclusive in my opinion. Whether they are truly unrelated will depend on the behavioral evidence. -- Avi (talk) 15:04, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

anyways thanks mr Avraham . i checked check user's archieve where 1 of above ids (فلورانس) was checked already and the result was showing aliahmad201132 ، مازیاربندانی and him(فلورانس) are same persons along with his flobot(فلورانس's bot) . but i am over 95% sure damavandi and saltanat ebli are also same persons , this user has so many usernames to use them to cheat in elections like once he told his friend as slang that " i have brought 3 id cards to vote for some administration candidate". btw i would thank you so much if u try and check above usernames once again dear Avraham.Tehranpizzaparlor (talk) 19:08, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

i found a recent pole where damavandi votes + for what فلورانس asks

Could you help?

Status: Not done

I request to check this editing made on behalf of DarDar. I do not remember that I made those changes and I suspect, someone other has edited under my name. Thanks in advance, --DarDar (talk) 15:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I suggest you to change your password to a strong one if you've not done that already. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:06, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

... apart from MarcoAurelio's suggestion, the request is rather outside the scope of CU, so I'll close this as Not done. --Bencmq (talk) 13:07, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

It's a pity, because there were heated discussions about "delphic articles": [1] & [2]. Therefore I would like to know, is it possible, that this editing was made from external (not mine) computer? Could you check only this editing, please. Thanks a lot in advance for the answer. --DarDar (talk) 06:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

1) It is not possible to just check one edit, without getting the full userdata (or a fraction of them) first. 2) CU doesn't prove innocence; even if the edit appears to be done from a different computer or location, we'll still won't be able to say with 100% certitude that you were not the one that made the edit. But since you seem rather concerned, I'll ask for more eyes to review this. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

If I had to guess, it was an accident caused by being unfamiliar with the Wikidata interface. --Rs chen 7754 11:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

At 14:39 on 13 March 2013, a bot moved the interwikis for the article to Wikidata. This was an article DarDar had edited before. Two minutes later the edit by DarDar was made on Wikidata. I strongly suspect, as Rschen7754 suggests, that you changed the Wikidata entry by mistake when reviewing the change made by the bot QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Dear checkusers, I am very grateful for your explanations and willingness to help! --DarDar (talk) 13:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Demian (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Parniyan21 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): User:Demian has been inactive for over 2 years, but suddenly he is participating in an AFD that User:Parniyan21 has recently started. [3][4] (The AFD is semi-protected and this may explain why should someone use an old account.) According to first edits of User:Parniyan21 he/she has been familiar with editing in Wikipedia and their recent edits are made with a few minutes difference 11:06 (UTC) - 11:15 (UTC). Probable usage of multiple accounts to reinforce opinions in AFD. -- Dalba 21 Ordibehesht 1392/ 12:37, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed, plus Hojoom --Bencmq (talk) 13:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Not done

List of users: Siam4319 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Pratyya Ghosh (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): Pratyya Ghosh requested here for administrator and Siam4319 support him. but Siam4319 have no contribute in wiktionary. according to this link he/she's Total editcount only 3 --Aftab1995 (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done No check necessary here, it more looks like a "meatpuppet". Anyway this one vote of a user with 2 edits won't have influenced the granting of temp. adminship much. --MF-W 18:56, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

but i need to know this. Coz If the result is confirmed, then i can report in local community. Thanks Aftab1995 (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

It's unlikely that there is a manipulative use of multiple accounts here, because the value of the vote can already be determined quite easily thanks to the explanation of the voter himself ("He is my classmate."). The checkuser tool is an instrument that shouldn't be used if it's not necessary, because it might violate a user's privacy. There's no need to check and no need to know even more than we already know. Mathonius (talk) 07:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Komunitastolikara@wikidatawiki

Status: Done

List of users: Alorkalabahi ([[; Special:Contributions/Alorkalabahi|contr]] · [[; Special:DeletedContributions/Alorkalabahi|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Komunitastolikara ([[; Special:Contributions/Komunitastolikara|contr]] · [[; Special:DeletedContributions/Komunitastolikara|deleted]] · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): By behavior, the second account is a sockpuppet of the first. We'd like to see if there's anything else to uncover.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Seems

Unrelated Matanya (talk) 06:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Nekako (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Priava (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Elgar (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Kikič (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Example

Reason(s): Posible abuse multiple account. --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:59, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Why exactly? Can you explain where the abuse is? Can you give us some diffs? Trijnstel_talk 12:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

1, 2, 3, 4. User cheating in the vote for selected articles in Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia. Rjecina2 Administrator has blocked all four accounts permanently. --Kolega2357 (talk) 12:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

All are

Confirmed and I also found these unblocked sockpuppets:

Muh

Kliš

There might be more, but I can't tell for sure. Trijnstel_talk 13:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

MS

Status: Done

List of users: BuluAyam (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); KeluarMalaysia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); PRU13PRUPalingKotorDalamSejarahMalaysia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); KabinetBukan1Malaysia (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Ubah5May (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); SuaraHantu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: And a lot more..... Request IP to be block, since I expect no useful contribution come from those IP.

Reason(s): Posible abuse multiple account for slander political statements. Have try to block as long as possible, but user keep change accounts. Yosri (talk) 02:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed --Bencmq (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Muh (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Vatra (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Example

Reason(s): Abuse multiple account. Has the same behavior of a user as Muh. They have the same user page Vatra and Muh. --Kolega2357 (talk) 18:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed and no more sockpuppets right now. Trijnstel_talk 20:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Губин Михаил@bxr.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Губин Михаил (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 88.146.117.141 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Example

Reason(s): A similar style of communication. With IP only insults and vandalism.--Region190 (talk) 12:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Not done No requirement determined. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Why? This IP have vandal contribous and his style of communication similar on style Губин Михаил.--Region190 (talk) 12:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

If the wiki needs a checkuser, I am sure that the administrators will contact us. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

I undestand.--Region190 (talk) 12:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

The user actually admitted on his talk page that the the IP address is his. Ruslik (talk) 19:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Oc [email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Oc Verder (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Nekako (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log

Reason(s): User that had been permabanned for using multiple accounts has, obviously, created a new one. His contributions obviously prove a similar thematic interest as well as a very blatant style of writing, combined with Google-helped translations. --Edgar Allan Poe (talk) 12:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Unrelated--Shizhao (talk) 13:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Not done

List of users: Picker78 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Greek Picker (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Rainbow Demon (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); PAO 1910 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Dionisia Bekri (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: w:el:Βικιπαίδεια:Μαριονέτα

Reason(s): Users Picker78, Greek Picker, Rainbow Demon, PAO 1910 and Dionisia Bekri could be, eventually, the same person as their acting looks very identical. For example their favourite article subjects are Panathinaikos and the Greek Superleague where they have a particulary critic view (not to say hostile) towards a Greek sports journalist, called Kousounelos (<--unfortunately his biography in this link is in greek... i couldn't find one in english... sorry...) (only a look in their contributions will prove it, due to their numberous comments against him)... Also, they are doing everything in order to change the foundation date of Panathinaikos AO from 1908 to 1910 or, at least, get it accepted as an alternative date of the foundation of the club... A foolish idea, if I can say it, beacause the club's homepage clearly mentions that it has been founded in 1908 and not in 1910 as Picker78 and his (eventual) sockpuppets believe... Also, all of them have a (the same ?) particulary agressive vocabulary (troll-acting ?) against every user who's against their beliefs/positions on these, mentionned before, issues... All we need (as el@wiki), is your confirmation for a link between these 5 users in order to take care of their case, according to our local policies... Thanks in advance...

PS. Sorry, if Ive been too long and for any english faults...Glorious 93 (talk) 16:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Picker78, Dionisia Bekri and Rainbow Demon were confirmed as socks on en.wikipedia and therefore do not need a further check. Greek Picker passes the Duck test - not just the name but the crosswiki contribution history (e.g., here) and finally PAO 1910 will be stale as there are no actions for 5 months, so CU will return no data. QuiteUnusual (talk) 07:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

PAO 1910 is actually confirmed on enwiki per w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Picker78/Archive. --Rs chen 7754 05:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, missed that one somehow QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

I have nothing against Mr. Kousounelos. Panathinaikos was actually founded in 1910, no matter what the official story says. One day truth will be restored. Glorious 93 is still very young, this is why he talks nonsense. Grow up first kid. Picker78 (talk) 19:34, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Moderation in choice of words would be quite appropriate for a proven sockpuppetter. --MF-W 19:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

I have 100 sockpuppets. So what? My sockpuppets' contribution in Wikipedia (english & greek) is very serious. I just like having sockpuppets. This doesn't mean I want to destroy Wikipedia. Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppets is wrong. My sockpuppets are always doing a serious job. Picker78 (talk) 21:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Some projects have a policy against sockpuppets, regardless of your intentions QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Let's make a deal! Instead of letting me create new sockpuppets all the time, just unblock the sockmaster (Picker78) and everything will be OK. What do you say? Picker78 (talk) 13:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status: Done

List of users: Natig98 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Krolik2005 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Maurice07 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Natig98bot (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: [5]

Reason(s): Resurgence under different accounts after original accounts are blocked for disruptive edits, edit warring and vandalism. The spirit of contributions, the user pages and general behavior is the same from all the listed accounts. Uses turkish and azeri national symbols in signatures and talk pages. Uses multiple accounts when commenting on one of the account's talk pages. There may be more sock puppets as well. The bot account was used ti circumvent a block of the user account ― Teak (talk) 18:36, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

The following users are

Confirmed :

NatigKrolik
Natig98
Chuchka.shinshilly
Krolik2005
Natig98bot
NatigBot

I didn't check Maurice07 as he's clearly unrelated to me. Regards, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 09:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)