Skip to main content
Log in

Threefold increased bile duct injury rate is associated with less surgeon experience in an insurance claims database

More rigorous training in biliary surgery may be needed

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Bile duct injury (BDI) remains the dreaded complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) over the last two decades. Although the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification is now required for new applicants by the American Board of Surgery, the impact of FLS on procedure-specific outcomes is unknown. Moreover, the FLS content centers on fundamental education and not procedure-specific complication reduction such as BDI, magnifying the importance of understanding the educational impact of FLS on specific case types. This study reviewed the impact of FLS certification and other factors on the incidence of bile duct injury in a large insurance claims database.

Methods

In total, 53,632 LCs were reviewed from July 2009 to December 2010 from a large private payer claims database. Surgeon National Provider Identifier (NPI), FLS certification status, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) were available for each event. Each record was analyzed for evidence of any bile duct injury based on associated CPT or ICD-9 data in the claim record. Characteristics of the FLS+ and FLS− surgeon groups were analyzed by a separate reviewer blinded to clinical outcome on a large scale.

Results

A total of 53,632 LCs were reviewed; 1748 LC were performed by 441 FLS+ surgeons; and 58,870 LCs by 10,851 FLS- surgeons. (Some procedures involved more than one surgeon). Eighty-two BDIs were identified: 8 in the FLS+ and 74 in the FLS− group. The FLS+ group had a higher rate of BDI than the FLS− group (0.47 vs. 0.14 %, p = 0.0013); however, the FLS+ group was also younger (mean age 38.2 FLS+ vs. 50.4 years) and had significantly fewer years in practice (FLS+ = 6.1 vs. FLS− = 20.7, p = 0.0012). No other complications showed differences between the groups.

Conclusion

NPI can be used as a linking intermediary between skills certification and outcomes on claims databases. FLS certification was not associated with a reduction in bile duct injury in this analysis, but FLS+ surgeons were also younger and less experienced overall. Since FLS lacks content specific to BDI, large-scale validated training and assessment programs targeted at BDI prevention are needed to impact the rate of this complication during cholecystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078

  2. Berci G, Hunter J, Morgenstern L et al (2013) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first, do no harm; second, take care of bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 27:1051–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Edelman DA, Mattos MA, Bouwman DL (2010) FLS skill retention (learning) in first year surgery residents. J Surg Res 163:24–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried GM (2008) FLS assessment of competency using simulated laparoscopic tasks. J Gastrointest Surg 12:210–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McCluney AL, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA et al (2007) FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill. Surg Endosc 21:1991–1995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL et al (2004) Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 135:21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W et al (2003) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 237:460–469

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Prystowsky JB (2005) Are young surgeons competent to perform alimentary tract surgery? Arch Surg 140:495–500 Discussion -2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB et al (2013) General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg 258:440–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Navez B, Ungureanu F, Michiels M et al (2012) Surgical management of acute cholecystitis: results of a 2-year prospective multicenter survey in Belgium. Surg Endosc 26:2436–2445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bucholz EM, Sue GR, Yeo H, Roman SA, Bell RH Jr, Sosa JA (2011) Our trainees’ confidence: results from a national survey of 4136 US general surgery residents. Arch Surg 146:907–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Coleman JJ, Esposito TJ, Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV (2013) Acute care surgery: now that we have built it, will they come? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:463–468 discussion 8–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coleman JJ, Esposito TJ, Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV (2013) Early subspecialization and perceived competence in surgical training: are residents ready? J Am Coll Surg 216:764–771 discussion 71–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Decker MR, Bronson NW, Greenberg CC, Dolan JP, Kent KC, Hunter JG (2013) The general surgery job market: analysis of current demand for general surgeons and their specialized skills. J Am Coll Surg 217:1133–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Steven Schwaitzberg has ongoing consultant activities with Olympus, Stryker, Surgiquest, Neatstitch, Cambridge Endo, Human Extension and Acuity Bio. Daniel Jones is a consultant for Allurion and receives editorial royalties from Uptodate, CineMed and Wolters. Daniel Scott has received research/equipment grants from Ethicon, Covidien, Karl Storz and Intuitive Surgical; He serves as a consultant for Accelerated Technologies. Johanna Castrillion has no disclosures. Sophia McKinley has no disclosures. Tina Hunter a paid employee of S2 Statistical Solutions and as such, provides statistical consulting services to various phamaceutica, device companies and research institutions. Michael Brunt has no disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven D. Schwaitzberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwaitzberg, S.D., Scott, D.J., Jones, D.B. et al. Threefold increased bile duct injury rate is associated with less surgeon experience in an insurance claims database. Surg Endosc 28, 3068–3073 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3580-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3580-0

Keywords

Navigation