Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
answered the question
Line 70: Line 70:
:{{nao}} I don't think you will require this right much. Also I believe that voluntary works are not made from official accounts, so most likely you will not create any article by the account. Cheers! [[User:Vibhijain|<span style="color:#B57EDC">♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛</span>]] [[User talk:Vibhijain|<sup><span style="color:red"><small>Talk</small></span></sup>]] [[Special:EmailUser/Vibhijain|<sup><span style="color:blue"><small>Email</small></span></sup>]] 13:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
:{{nao}} I don't think you will require this right much. Also I believe that voluntary works are not made from official accounts, so most likely you will not create any article by the account. Cheers! [[User:Vibhijain|<span style="color:#B57EDC">♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛</span>]] [[User talk:Vibhijain|<sup><span style="color:red"><small>Talk</small></span></sup>]] [[Special:EmailUser/Vibhijain|<sup><span style="color:blue"><small>Email</small></span></sup>]] 13:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
::I'm trying to tell you that I am a trusted user.Thus, my articles do not need the patrolling.[[User:Jordon (WMF)|Jordon (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jordon (WMF)|talk]]) 13:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
::I'm trying to tell you that I am a trusted user.Thus, my articles do not need the patrolling.[[User:Jordon (WMF)|Jordon (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jordon (WMF)|talk]]) 13:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
:::And how can we verify that? The only edits you made were requests for permissions you don't need or cannot provide any real rationale why you will need that right. That looks even worse than TomTom00 a few months ago! <small style="font: 12px Courier New; color: #000000; display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 3px 1px 4px;background-color:#fff">[[User talk:Mabdul|mabdul]]</small> 13:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:18, 30 June 2012


Autopatrolled

(add requestview requests)

User:Genghiskhan

This user has created 88 articles about Vietnam, most of them are notable enough and don't need patrolling. He is also a member of wiki project Vietnam and a trusted user at vi.wp. Thanks in advance Morning Sunshine (talk) 13:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done--v/r - TP 12:37, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheSpecialUser

User has created 80 articles so far. He has experience working in GA's and he recently promoted Green Day to a GA with 70+ edits on that article. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 16:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done--v/r - TP 12:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Z4617925

And also for this user who has had over 300 edits and created 121 articles here so far Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Another admin is welcome to make a different decision here, but I see a lot of unreferenced and weakly sourced articles with questionable notability.--v/r - TP 12:39, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Coin945

This user has created 211 referenced pages. TAP 20:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - I will note that I only see around 100 paged created by this user. That said, Coin945 still meets our guidelines. Tiptoety talk 05:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Surtsicna

User has created 104 pages. TAP 14:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done--v/r - TP 12:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Makecat

I have created 66 articles(1 over redirect). I created hundreds of articles on other projects as well.MakecatTalk 09:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do you mean that on Chinese Wikipedia? Because few people edited such road articles, so I created some using substitution of a template and will expand them later. --MakecatTalk 09:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done--v/r - TP 12:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User: Simione001

User has created 267 articles - I'm tired of patrolling them! :) Theopolisme TALK 17:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done--v/r - TP 21:37, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cnilep

I have created 36 pages in article space (excluding redirects), plus 248 pages in User talk space, welcoming or warning new users. As far as I know, there have been no serious issues with pages I created. I also used to patrol new pages, though I haven't done so recently. I've been a registered user for about five years. Cnilep (talk) 07:24, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I suggest you have a quick read through WP:AUTOPAT. Autopatrolled is given to users who have created 50 or more articles in the main namespace, excluding talk page and other namespaces. Thanks. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 11:23, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vivek Rai

I feel I can give ample time to monitor and expand newly created pages as they add a lot of new information to Wikipedia. If these pages be cautiously patrolled, they might turn out much valuable. Also, Old users should be given some rest. VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  07:57, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There are atleast 6-7 articles that I'm working on in my user space. Moreover, Most of the articles I have created are of very good length and I have worked on all of them myself. Sorry, But I beg to differ with your comment. It shouldn't be a compelling reason to decline my request. Thanks foe taking time to observe. VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  11:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your work, but you are not creating so many articles that it is causing problems to NPPers. I think you will be granted the rights without being asked any question if you can reach the threshold of 50 articles (and as usual, all of good quality). :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:49, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jordon (WMF)

Hello, community.I have been appointed for Wikimedia foundation recently.So, It would give me a ease of access for handling English Wikipedia if my account is flagged as auto patrolled rights.Thanks. Jordon (WMF) (talk) 12:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) This is permission is for users, who create many high quality articles. As you have not created even one article, you don't need it. It also doesn't do anything for you. It just makes the new page patrollers work easier. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 12:42, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes.Actually I am a trusted user because of being a part of Wikimedia foundation.This way, My articles especially the notable and encyclopedic of foundation operations and activities would not be needed paroling.Jordon (WMF) (talk) 12:53, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Autopatrolled is for the article namespace and there are no, which discuss the operations and activities of the foundation. meta: is that way. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 12:57, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
First of all. The meta is global site for all projects.You're right.Sometimes a project or event is also notable and encyclopedic.An article must has to be created to denote this.Jordon (WMF) (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This however doesn't mean you need the right. It doesn't make article creation for you easier. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 13:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I don't think you will require this right much. Also I believe that voluntary works are not made from official accounts, so most likely you will not create any article by the account. Cheers! ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to tell you that I am a trusted user.Thus, my articles do not need the patrolling.Jordon (WMF) (talk) 13:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And how can we verify that? The only edits you made were requests for permissions you don't need or cannot provide any real rationale why you will need that right. That looks even worse than TomTom00 a few months ago! mabdul 13:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]