Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gadugi (2nd nomination)

Gadugi

Previous AfD-discussion can be found here. The reason for the previous nomination seems to have been only the frustration experienced by user:Gadugi concerning his relations to other Wikipedia editors. That the article is about a term in Cherokee which seems to have no relevance in Engolish seems to have been completely overlooked in the last nomination and, well, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. If this is a central concept of Cherokee culture, then merge the relevant information. Other than that it's an obvious delete. Peter ^Isotalo 21:37, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Renomination moved to separate page. --cesarb 00:00, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy keep — Renomination made on the same day previous discussion was closed. --cesarb 00:00, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
  • First Gadugi bad-faith-nominates his own article and almost everyone votes to auto-keep. Now I'm trying to nominate it for a valid reason and you're trying to shut it down on account of a technicality. And on top of this you screw up my linking to the old nomination. What's wrong with you guys? Do you even care about the articles, or is the process the only thing that matters here? / Peter ^Isotalo 02:06, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Appears to be an important notable concept to Cherokee culture (and one that was intended to be central to Wikipedia Culture oh, did I say that out loud?) Merge with Cherokee ranks much higher than deletion for me. WCFrancis 04:03, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep' Afd already passed. Karmosin is suffering a hissy fit because he did not get his way in previous sections. This type of action evidences disruption of my work since I have to waste yet more time dealing with immature ad childish issues rather than writing articles. Opening WP:RFA seeking administrative sanctions for violating the Afd process against Karmosen.
• Weak delete It's still a dictdef. Could be merged to Cherokee probably.  Grue  05:54, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

• It's not a dictdef nor does it meet the views of a dictdef since it now contains encyclopedia content. I suppose to some people every problem looks like a nail when all you have is a hammer. Gadugi 05:58, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

user:gadugi requests administrative sanctions and dispute resolution against user:karmosin

An Afd process was commeneced by me aganst page ah-ni-yv-wi-ya. The Afd process concluded with Karmosin putting forward views that the page should be redirected and merged. The majority rejected his views. After the Afd ended, Karmosin vandalized then blanked the page in question, then out of retaliation flagged a page which had just completed Afd that morning for a second Afd process. I want 1) the Afd reverted on page Gadugi and Karmosin sanctioned for violating wiki/Wales policy of We Are Nice People Who Do Not Act This Way. On his user page his lists himself as a "rebel" which isn't something that fits in with Wiki's peaceful honeybee meme. While I respect all peoples right to their views and opinions, after an Afd completes, nominating pages out of retaliation in an attempt to oppress the majority is improper. I would like this user punished for 1) violating policies and 2) wasting yet more of my valuable time answering stupid and frivolous Afd requests and 3) interfering with me writing more articles. UPDATE: Karmosin is also making RACIST STATEMENTS on the Afd page for Cherokee Moons Ceremonies which attack my race and culture calling my work "Cherokee-Cruft". This conduct is WHOLLY unacceptable.