Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎User-reported: Beth Medrash Govoha and Satmar (Hasidic dynasty) - possibly sockpuppet of {{u|debresser}}
Line 34: Line 34:
::{{AIV|i}} So far only four edits, and none since being warned that a block might be possible. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 13:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
::{{AIV|i}} So far only four edits, and none since being warned that a block might be possible. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 13:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
* {{IPvandal|2600:380:8C27:4185:F939:2BAF:9A26:1185}} and {{IPvandal|69.164.131.58}} contribtuions are solely vandalism, to articles [[Beth Medrash Govoha]] and [[Satmar (Hasidic dynasty)]]. Some seem directly retaliatory to a related dispute involving {{u|Debresser}} in article [[Chabad]] regarding the size of that group compared to others. Part of the vandalism by these accounts reduce the size of the [[Satmar (Hasidic dynasty)]] group by four orders of magnitude —''<b>[[User:Boruch Baum|Boruch Baum]]</b>'' ([[User talk:Boruch Baum|talk]]) 14:37, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
* {{IPvandal|2600:380:8C27:4185:F939:2BAF:9A26:1185}} and {{IPvandal|69.164.131.58}} contribtuions are solely vandalism, to articles [[Beth Medrash Govoha]] and [[Satmar (Hasidic dynasty)]]. Some seem directly retaliatory to a related dispute involving {{u|Debresser}} in article [[Chabad]] regarding the size of that group compared to others. Part of the vandalism by these accounts reduce the size of the [[Satmar (Hasidic dynasty)]] group by four orders of magnitude —''<b>[[User:Boruch Baum|Boruch Baum]]</b>'' ([[User talk:Boruch Baum|talk]]) 14:37, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
::*Users have not been properly warned. Nevertheless, the vandalism was obvious and appeared to be ongoing so I protected two articles. Please warn vandals in the future so that the admins can take the appropriate "next" step. Thank you for your report. [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 14:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:47, 11 January 2016

"WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Wikipedia:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.
    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.
    Shortcut

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 11:39 on 28 June 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Reports

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    Warned user. for edit warring. No clear evidence was provided that the IPs and this user are related, even though they might be. I don't know. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. So far only four edits, and none since being warned that a block might be possible. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Users have not been properly warned. Nevertheless, the vandalism was obvious and appeared to be ongoing so I protected two articles. Please warn vandals in the future so that the admins can take the appropriate "next" step. Thank you for your report. Tiderolls 14:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&oldid=699301939"