UNCOL: Difference between revisions
GliderMaven (talk | contribs) →History: the source explicitly says this, so your opinion is irrelevant, originally computers had 24, 36 bit data widths etc. which are not POWERS of two |
Computerphile is not a reliable source |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
In the 1970s, [[compiler-compiler]]s ultimately contributed to solving the problem that UNCOL set itself: the economical production of compilers for new languages and new machines.}} |
In the 1970s, [[compiler-compiler]]s ultimately contributed to solving the problem that UNCOL set itself: the economical production of compilers for new languages and new machines.}} |
||
UNCOL is sometimes used as a generic term for the idea of a universal intermediate language. The [[Architecture Neutral Distribution Format]] is an example of an UNCOL in this sense, as are various [[bytecode]] systems such as [[UCSD Pascal]]'s [[p-code machine|p-code]], and most notably [[Java bytecode]]. |
UNCOL is sometimes used as a generic term for the idea of a universal intermediate language. The [[Architecture Neutral Distribution Format]] is an example of an UNCOL in this sense, as are various [[bytecode]] systems such as [[UCSD Pascal]]'s [[p-code machine|p-code]], and most notably [[Java bytecode]]. |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Revision as of 22:07, 4 October 2019
UNCOL (Universal Computer Oriented Language) was a proposed universal intermediate language for compilers introduced by Melvin E. Conway in 1958. It was never fully specified or implemented; in many ways it was more a concept than a language.
UNCOL was intended to make compilers economically available for each new instruction set architecture and programming language. Each machine architecture would require just one compiler back end, and each programming language would require one compiler front end. This was a very ambitious goal in 1961 because compiler technology was in its infancy, and little was standardized in computer hardware and software.
History
The concept of such a universal intermediate language is old: the SHARE report (1958) already says "[it has] been discussed by many independent persons as long ago as 1954." Macrakis (1993) summarizes its fate:
UNCOL was an ambitious effort for the early 1960s. An attempt to solve the compiler-writing problem, it ultimately failed because language and compiler technology were not yet mature. In the 1970s, compiler-compilers ultimately contributed to solving the problem that UNCOL set itself: the economical production of compilers for new languages and new machines.
UNCOL is sometimes used as a generic term for the idea of a universal intermediate language. The Architecture Neutral Distribution Format is an example of an UNCOL in this sense, as are various bytecode systems such as UCSD Pascal's p-code, and most notably Java bytecode.
See also
References
- Conway, Melvin E. (1 October 1958). "Proposal for an UNCOL". Communications of the ACM. 1 (10): 5–8. doi:10.1145/368924.368928. ISSN 0001-0782.
- Jean E. Sammet, Programming Languages: History and Fundamentals, Prentice-Hall, 1969. Chapter X.2: UNCOL (Significant Unimplemented Concepts), p. 708.
- SHARE Ad-Hoc Committee on Universal Languages (J. Strong, J. Olsztyn, J. Wegstein, O. Mock, A. Tritter, T. Steel), "The Problem of Programming Communication with Changing Machines", Communications of the ACM 1:8:12–18 (August 1958) and 1:9:9–15 (September 1958).
- Stavros Macrakis, "From UNCOL to ANDF: Progress in Standard Intermediate Languages", White Paper, Open Software Foundation Research Institute, RI-ANDF-TP2-1, January, 1992. Available at CiteSeer
- T.B. Steel, Jr., "UNCOL: Universal Computer Oriented Language Revisited", Datamation (Jan/Feb 1960), p. 18.
- T.B. Steel, Jr., "A First Version of UNCOL", Proc. Western Joint Computer Conference 19:371 (Los Angeles, May 9–11, 1961).
- T.B. Steel, Jr., "UNCOL: The Myth and the Fact", Annual Review in Automatic Programming 2:325 (1961).