Jump to content

Jedi Blue: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎History: correct placement of parentheses
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
→‎Defendant responses: MOS:CURLY; spacing; merge quotes from the same source
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 16: Line 16:


=== Google ===
=== Google ===
Google spokesperson Peter Schottenfels said, “Despite Attorney General [[Ken Paxton|Paxton]]'s three attempts to re-write his complaint, it is still full of inaccuracies and lacks legal merit”. “There is vigorous competition in online advertising, which has reduced ad tech fees, and expanded options for publishers and advertisers.<ref name=":0"/>
Google spokesperson Peter Schottenfels said, *Despite Attorney General [[Ken Paxton|Paxton]]'s three attempts to re-write his complaint, it is still full of inaccuracies and lacks legal merit&nbsp;... There is vigorous competition in online advertising, which has reduced ad tech fees, and expanded options for publishers and advertisers."<ref name=":0"/>


=== Facebook ===
=== Facebook ===
Meta spokesperson Christopher Sgro said, “Meta’s non-exclusive bidding agreement with Google and the similar agreements we have with other bidding platforms, have helped to increase competition for ad placements... These business relationships enable Meta to deliver more value to advertisers while fairly compensating publishers, resulting in better outcomes for all.<ref name=":0"/>
Meta spokesperson Christopher Sgro said, "Meta's non-exclusive bidding agreement with Google and the similar agreements we have with other bidding platforms, have helped to increase competition for ad placements&nbsp;... These business relationships enable Meta to deliver more value to advertisers while fairly compensating publishers, resulting in better outcomes for all."<ref name=":0"/>


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 15:59, 23 February 2023

Jedi Blue is the name of an agreement between Alphabet and Meta Platforms that allegedly gave Facebook an illegal advantage in Google's ad auctions in exchange for Facebook's word that it would end its own ad service plans.[1][2]

History

In 2007 Google purchased DoubleClick and its DoubleClickForPublishers advertising system.[2] Header bidding emerged in 2017 as a new way for purchasers to buy ad space. It allowed advertisers to participate in auctions across multiple ad platforms (such as Google's). Facebook announced plans to become header bidding-compatible. This would allow Facebook advertisers to bypass Google's platform, adding to Facebook's revenues and subtracting from Google's.[1] In 2018, Facebook and Google came to an agreement, leading Facebook to retreat from header bidding that became a focus in the suit.[2]

Multiple U.S. states sued Google in 2020. Details about the agreement were obtained in the course of the lawsuit.[1]

On March 11, 2022, an investigation of the agreement was started in the European Union and the United Kingdom by antitrust regulators, with claims that it undermined competition in the advertising market.[3]

Agreement

Facebook agreed to reduce its participation in header bidding in return for "information, speed, and other advantages" that would come from staying with Google. Facebook would receive a guarantee of 90% of auctions regardless of the bids; 300 ms to bid (vs 160 offered to others), along with the ability to identify 80% of smartphone users and 60% of web users.[1][2]

Defendant responses

Google

Google spokesperson Peter Schottenfels said, *Despite Attorney General Paxton's three attempts to re-write his complaint, it is still full of inaccuracies and lacks legal merit ... There is vigorous competition in online advertising, which has reduced ad tech fees, and expanded options for publishers and advertisers."[1]

Facebook

Meta spokesperson Christopher Sgro said, "Meta's non-exclusive bidding agreement with Google and the similar agreements we have with other bidding platforms, have helped to increase competition for ad placements ... These business relationships enable Meta to deliver more value to advertisers while fairly compensating publishers, resulting in better outcomes for all."[1]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f Wodinsky, Shoshana (January 14, 2022). "Google's Pichai, Meta's Zuckerberg Backed Alleged Ad Price-Fixing Scheme, Unsealed Court Docs Claim". Gizmodo. Retrieved 2022-01-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  2. ^ a b c d Dans, Enrique (January 19, 2022). "Jedi Blue: A Scandal That Highlights, Yet Again, The Need To Regulate Big Tech". Forbes. Retrieved 2022-01-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. ^ Satariano, Adam (11 March 2022). "A secret ad deal between Google and Meta is under scrutiny in Europe". The New York Times. Retrieved 14 March 2022.