Jump to content

Heteronormativity: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(43 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2023}}
{{short description|Ideology asserting heterosexuality as the only social norm}}
{{short description|Concept asserting heterosexuality as the only social norm}}
{{globalize||2=Anglosphere|date=January 2023}}
{{Distinguish|Heteronomy}}
{{LGBT sidebar}}
{{globalize|article|2=Anglosphere|date=January 2023}}
{{Discrimination sidebar|state=collapsed}}
{{LGBT sidebar|attitudes}}
'''Heteronormativity''' is the concept that [[heterosexuality]] is the preferred or [[Norm (social)|normal]] mode of [[sexual orientation]].<ref name="Harris">{{cite book|vauthors =Harris J, White V|title =A Dictionary of Social Work and Social Care|isbn = 978-0-19-251686-2 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2018|access-date=August 19, 2018|page=335|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M3FGDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT335}}</ref> It assumes the [[gender binary]] (i.e., that there are only two distinct, opposite [[Gender|genders]]) and that sexual and marital relations are most fitting between people of opposite sex. A heteronormative view, therefore, involves alignment of biological [[sex]], [[Human sexuality|sexuality]], [[gender identity]] and [[gender role]]s. Heteronormativity is often linked to [[heterosexism]] and [[homophobia]].<ref name="Harris"/><ref name="Gorski">{{cite book|vauthors =Goodman RD, Gorski PC|title =Decolonizing "Multicultural" Counseling through Social Justice|isbn = 978-1-4939-1283-4 |publisher=[[Springer Publishing|Springer]]|year=2014|access-date=August 19, 2018|pages=28–30|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MeYlBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA28}}</ref> The effects of societal heteronormativity on [[lesbian]], [[gay]] and [[bisexual]] individuals can be examined as heterosexual or "straight" [[privilege (sociology)|privilege]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Williford |first1=Beth |title=Heterosexual privilege |journal=Encyclopedia of Gender and Society |year=2009 |pages=418–420 |doi=10.4135/9781412964517 |isbn=9781412909167 |url=http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/gender/n208.xml}}</ref>
{{Discrimination sidebar|Related}}
'''Heteronormativity''' is the concept that [[heterosexuality]] is the preferred or [[Norm (social)|normal]] [[sexual orientation]].<ref name="Harris">{{cite book|vauthors =Harris J, White V|title =A Dictionary of Social Work and Social Care|isbn = 978-0-19-251686-2 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2018|access-date=19 August 2018|page=335|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M3FGDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT335}}</ref> It assumes the [[gender binary]] (i.e., that there are only two distinct, opposite [[gender]]s) and that sexual and marital relations are most fitting between people of opposite sex.

Heteronormativity creates and upholds a social hierarchy based on sexual orientation with the practice and belief that heterosexuality is deemed as the societal norm.<ref>Ray, T. N., & Parkhill, M. R. (2021). Heteronormativity, Disgust Sensitivity, and Hostile Attitudes toward Gay Men: Potential Mechanisms to Maintain Social Hierarchies. Sex Roles, 84(1/2), 49–60. {{doi|10.1007/s11199-020-01146-w}}</ref><references group="Ray, T. N., & Parkhill, M. R. (2021). Heteronormativity, Disgust Sensitivity, and Hostile Attitudes toward Gay Men: Potential Mechanisms to Maintain Social Hierarchies. Sex Roles, 84(1/2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01146-w" /> A heteronormative view, therefore, involves alignment of biological [[sex]], [[Human sexuality|sexuality]], [[gender identity]] and [[gender role]]s. Heteronormativity has been linked to [[heterosexism]] and [[homophobia]],<ref name="Harris" /><ref name="Gorski">{{cite book|vauthors =Goodman RD, Gorski PC|title =Decolonizing "Multicultural" Counseling through Social Justice|isbn = 978-1-4939-1283-4 |publisher=[[Springer Publishing|Springer]]|year=2014|access-date=19 August 2018|pages=28–30|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MeYlBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA28}}</ref> and the effects of societal heteronormativity on [[lesbian]], [[gay]] and [[bisexual]] individuals have been described as heterosexual or "straight" [[privilege (sociology)|privilege]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Williford |first1=Beth |title=Heterosexual privilege |journal=Encyclopedia of Gender and Society |year=2009 |pages=418–420 |doi=10.4135/9781412964517 |isbn=9781412909167 |url=http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/gender/n208.xml}}</ref>


==Etymology==
==Etymology==
[[Michael Warner]] popularized the term in 1991,<ref name="warner1991">{{cite journal |last1=Warner |first1=Michael |title=Introduction: Fear of a Queer Planet |journal=Social Text |date=1991 |issue=29 |pages=3–17 |jstor=466295 }}</ref> in one of the first major works of [[queer theory]]. The concept's roots are in [[Gayle Rubin]]'s notion of the "sex/gender system" and [[Adrienne Rich]]'s notion of [[Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence|compulsory heterosexuality]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rich |first1=Adrienne |authorlink=Adrienne Rich|title=Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence |journal=Signs |date=July 1980 |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=631–660 |doi=10.1086/493756 |s2cid=143604951 }}</ref> From the outset, theories of heteronormativity included a critical look at [[gender]]; Warner wrote that "every person who comes to a queer self-understanding knows in one way or another that her stigmatization is intricated with gender. ... Being queer ... means being able, more or less articulately, to challenge the common understanding of what [[gender difference]] means."<ref name="warner1991"/> [[Lauren Berlant]] and Warner further developed these ideas in their seminal essay, "Sex in Public."<ref name="Berlant98">{{cite journal |last1=Berlant |first1=Lauren |last2=Warner |first2=Michael |title=Sex in Public |journal=Critical Inquiry |date=1 January 1998 |volume=24 |issue=2 |pages=547–566 |doi=10.1086/448884 |s2cid=161701244 |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/448884 |issn=0093-1896}}</ref>
[[Michael Warner]] popularized the term in 1991,<ref name="warner1991">{{cite journal |last1=Warner |first1=Michael |title=Introduction: Fear of a Queer Planet |journal=Social Text |date=1991 |issue=29 |pages=3–17 |jstor=466295 }}</ref> in one of the first major works of [[queer theory]]. The concept's roots are in [[Gayle Rubin]]'s notion of the "sex/gender system" and [[Adrienne Rich]]'s notion of [[Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence|compulsory heterosexuality]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rich |first1=Adrienne |authorlink=Adrienne Rich|title=Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence |journal=Signs |date=July 1980 |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=631–660 |doi=10.1086/493756 |s2cid=143604951 }}</ref> From the outset, theories of heteronormativity included a critical look at gender; Warner wrote that "every person who comes to a queer self-understanding knows in one way or another that her stigmatization is intricated with gender. ... Being queer ... means being able, more or less articulately, to challenge the common understanding of what [[gender difference]] means."<ref name="warner1991"/> [[Lauren Berlant]] and Warner further developed these ideas in their seminal essay, "Sex in Public."<ref name="Berlant98">{{cite journal |author-link1=Lauren Berlant |last1=Berlant |first1=Lauren |last2=Warner |first2=Michael |title=Sex in Public |journal=Critical Inquiry |date=1 January 1998 |volume=24 |issue=2 |pages=547–566 |doi=10.1086/448884 |s2cid=161701244 |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/448884 |issn=0093-1896}}</ref>

==Discrimination==
Critics of heteronormative attitudes, such as [[Cathy J. Cohen]], [[Michael Warner]], and [[Lauren Berlant]],<ref name="Berlant98" /> argue that such attitudes are oppressive, stigmatizing, marginalizing of perceived deviant forms of sexuality and gender, and make self-expression more challenging when that expression does not conform to the norm.<ref name=lovaas>Lovaas, Karen, and Mercilee M. Jenkins. [https://books.google.com/books?id=fTRcvkxWV-IC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage "Charting a Path through the 'Desert of Nothing.'"] Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader. 8 July 2006. Sage Publications Inc. 5 May 2008</ref>{{page needed|date=August 2018}}<ref name="OutatWork"/> Heteronormativity describes how social institutions and policies reinforce the presumption that people are heterosexual and that gender and sex are natural binaries.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Gender in Communication|last = DeFrancisco|first = Victoria|publisher = SAGE Publication, Inc.|year = 2014|isbn = 978-1-4522-2009-3|location = U.S.A|pages = 16}}</ref> Heteronormative culture privileges heterosexuality as normal and natural and fosters a climate where LGBT individuals are discriminated against in marriage, tax codes, and employment.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.rutgersuniversitypress.org/violence-against-queer-people/9780813573151|title=Violence against Queer People|last=Meyer|first=Doug|publisher=Rutgers University Press|year=2015}}</ref><ref name=OutatWork>{{cite book|last=Krupat|first=Kitty|title=Out at Work: Building a Gay-Labor Alliance|year=2001|publisher=U of Minnesota Press|isbn=978-0-8166-3741-6|pages=268}}</ref> Following Berlant and Warner, Laurie and Stark also argue that the domestic "intimate sphere" becomes "the unquestioned non‐place that anchors heteronormative public discourses, especially those concerning marriage and adoption rights".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Laurie |first1=Timothy |last2=Stark |first2=Hannah |title=Reconsidering Kinship: Beyond the Nuclear Family with Deleuze and Guattari |journal=Cultural Studies Review |date=28 April 2011 |volume=18 |issue=1 |doi=10.5130/csr.v18i1.1612 |doi-access=free }}</ref>

===Against gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender individuals===
According to cultural anthropologist [[Gayle Rubin]], heteronormativity in mainstream society creates a "sex hierarchy" that graduates sexual practices from morally "good sex" to "bad sex". The hierarchy considers reproductive, monogamous sex between committed heterosexuals as "good," whereas any sexual act or individual who falls short of this standard is labeled as "bad." Specifically, this standard categorizes long-term committed gay couples and non-monogamous/sexually active gay individuals between the two poles.<ref name="thinkingsex">{{cite book|author=Rubin, Gayle|chapter=Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality|editor=Vance, Carole|title=Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality|year=1993}}</ref> Patrick McCreery, lecturer at [[New York University]], argues that this hierarchy explains how gay people are stigmatized for socially "deviant" sexual practices that are often practiced by straight people as well, such as consumption of pornography or sex in public places.<ref name="OutatWork"/> There are many studies of sexual orientation discrimination on college campuses.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Byron |first1=Reginald A. |last2=Lowe |first2=Maria R. |last3=Billingsley |first3=Brianna |last4=Tuttle |first4=Nathan |title=Performativity Double Standards and the Sexual Orientation Climate at a Southern Liberal Arts University |journal=Journal of Homosexuality |date=16 April 2017 |volume=64 |issue=5 |pages=671–696 |doi=10.1080/00918369.2016.1196994 |pmid=27267937 |s2cid=20963768 }}</ref>

McCreery states that this heteronormative hierarchy carries over to the workplace, where gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals face discrimination such as anti-homosexual hiring policies or workplace discrimination that often leaves "lowest hierarchy" individuals such as transsexual people vulnerable to the most overt discrimination and unable to find work.<ref name="OutatWork"/>

Applicants and current employees can be legally passed over or fired for being non-heterosexual or perceived as non-heterosexual in many countries. An example of this practice is found in the case of the chain restaurant [[Cracker Barrel]], which [[Cracker Barrel#LGBT policies|garnered national attention in 1991]] after they fired an employee for being openly lesbian, citing their policy that employees with "sexual preferences that fail to demonstrate normal heterosexual values were inconsistent with traditional American values." Workers such as the fired employee and effeminate male waiters (allegedly described as the true targets),<ref name="OutatWork"/> were legally fired by work policies "transgressing" against "normal" heteronormative culture.<ref name="OutatWork"/>

Mustafa Bilgehan Ozturk analyzes the interconnectivity of heteronormativity and sexual employment discrimination by tracing the impact of patriarchal practices and institutions on the workplace experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual employees in a variety of contexts in Turkey. This further demonstrates the specific historicity and localized power/knowledge formations that give rise to physical, professional, and psycho-emotive acts of prejudice against sexual minorities.<ref name="SexualOrientationDiscrimination">{{cite journal |last1=Bilgehan Ozturk |first1=Mustafa |title=Sexual orientation discrimination: Exploring the experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual employees in Turkey |journal=Human Relations |date=August 2011 |volume=64 |issue=8 |pages=1099–1118 |doi=10.1177/0018726710396249 |s2cid=59439253 }}</ref>

Certain religions have been known to promote heteronormative beliefs through their teachings.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|url=http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/article/homosexuality-and-religion|title=Homosexuality and Religion {{!}} SexInfo Online|website=www.soc.ucsb.edu|access-date=2019-03-21|archive-date=2019-06-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190614100124/http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/article/homosexuality-and-religion|url-status=dead}}</ref> According to Sociology professors Samuel Perry and Kara Snawder from The University of Oklahoma, multiple research studies in the past have shown that there can be and often is a link between the religious beliefs of Americans and homophobic behavior.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Perry |first1=Samuel L. |last2=Snawder |first2=Kara J. |title=Longitudinal Effects of Religious Media on Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage |journal=Sexuality & Culture |date=December 2016 |volume=20 |issue=4 |pages=785–804 |doi=10.1007/s12119-016-9357-y |s2cid=148173061 }}</ref> Out of the world's five major religions, the [[Abrahamic religions]]—Christianity, Judaism, and Islam—all uphold heteronormative views on marriage.<ref name=":2" /> Some examples of this playing out in recent years include the incident involving Kentucky clerk [[Kim Davis]], who refused to give marriage licenses to same-sex couples on the grounds that it violated her spiritual views,<ref>{{cite news |last1=Blinder |first1=Alan |last2=Lewin |first2=Tamar |title=Clerk in Kentucky Chooses Jail Over Deal on Same-Sex Marriage |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/04/us/kim-davis-same-sex-marriage.html |work=The New York Times |date=3 September 2015 }}</ref> as well as the Supreme Court ruling that a Colorado baker did not have to provide a wedding cake for a gay couple based on his religion.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_new2_22p3.pdf|title=Masterpiece Cake Shop, LTD v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission|date=March 21, 2019|website=supremecourt.gov|publisher=Supreme Court of the United States}}</ref>


==Relation to marriage and the nuclear family==
==Relation to marriage and the nuclear family==
Modern family structures in the past and present vary from what was typical of the 1950s [[nuclear family]]. In the United States, the families of the second half of the 19th century and early 20th century were characterized by the death of one or both parents for many American children.<ref name="Coontz">Coontz, S. (1992){{fcn|date=April 2020}}</ref> In 1985, the United States is estimated to have been home to approximately 2.5 million post-divorce, [[stepfamily]] households containing children.<ref name=CGG>{{cite journal |last1=Coleman |first1=Marilyn |last2=Ganong |first2=Lawrence H. |last3=Goodwin |first3=Chanel |title=The Presentation of Stepfamilies in Marriage and Family Textbooks: A Reexamination |journal=Family Relations |date=July 1994 |volume=43 |issue=3 |pages=289 |doi=10.2307/585420 |jstor=585420 }}</ref> During the late 80s, almost 20% of families with children headed by a married couple were stepfamilies.<ref name=CGG/>
Modern family structures in the past and present vary from what was typical of the 1950s [[nuclear family]]. In the United States, the families of the second half of the 19th century and early 20th century were characterized by the death of one or both parents for many American children.<ref name="Coontz">{{cite book |last1=Coontz |first1=Stephanie |title=The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap |date=1992 |publisher=Basic books |location=New York |isbn=0465001351}}{{page needed|date=May 2023}}</ref> In 1985, the United States is estimated to have been home to approximately 2.5 million post-divorce, [[stepfamily]] households containing children.<ref name=CGG>{{cite journal |last1=Coleman |first1=Marilyn |last2=Ganong |first2=Lawrence H. |last3=Goodwin |first3=Chanel |title=The Presentation of Stepfamilies in Marriage and Family Textbooks: A Reexamination |journal=Family Relations |date=July 1994 |volume=43 |issue=3 |pages=289 |doi=10.2307/585420 |jstor=585420 }}</ref> During the late 1980s, almost 20% of families with children headed by a married couple were stepfamilies.<ref name=CGG/>


Over the past three decades, rates of divorce, single parenting, and [[cohabitation]] have risen precipitously.<ref name="Benfer">Benfer, Amy. [http://archive.salon.com/mwt/feature/2001/06/07/family_values/index.html The Nuclear Family Takes a Hit] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080522052539/http://archive.salon.com/mwt/feature/2001/06/07/family_values/index.html |date=2008-05-22 }}, Salon.com. June 7, 2001</ref> Nontraditional families (which diverge from "a middle-class family with a bread-winning father and a stay-at-home mother, married to each other and raising their biological children") constitute the majority of families in the [[United States]] and [[Canada]] today.<ref name="Benfer"/> [[Shared Earning/Shared Parenting Marriage]] (also known as Peer Marriage) where two heterosexual parents are both providers of resources and nurturers to children has become popular. Modern families may also have single-parent headed families which can be caused by divorce, separation, death, families who have two parents who are not married but have children, or families with same-sex parents. With [[artificial insemination]], [[surrogate mother]]s, and [[adoption]], families do not have to be formed by the heteronormative biological union of a male and a female. <ref>{{cite journal |title=The Widening Concept of Parent in Canada: Step- Parents, Same-Sex Partners, & Parents by ART |journal=American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law |year=2012 |last1=Bala |first1=Nicholas |last2=Ashbourne |first2=Christine |volume=30 |issue=3 |url=https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1577&context=jgspl&httpsredir=1&referer= |accessdate=2021-07-04 }}</ref>
Over the past three decades, rates of divorce, single parenting, and [[cohabitation]] have risen precipitously.<ref name="Benfer">Benfer, Amy. [http://archive.salon.com/mwt/feature/2001/06/07/family_values/index.html The Nuclear Family Takes a Hit] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080522052539/http://archive.salon.com/mwt/feature/2001/06/07/family_values/index.html |date=22 May 2008 }}, Salon.com. 7 June 2001</ref> Nontraditional families (which diverge from "a middle-class family with a bread-winning father and a stay-at-home mother, married to each other and raising their biological children") constitute the majority of families in the [[United States]] and [[Canada]] today.<ref name="Benfer"/> [[Shared Earning/Shared Parenting Marriage]] (also known as Peer Marriage) where two heterosexual parents are both providers of resources and nurturers to children has become popular. Modern families may also have single-parent headed families which can be caused by divorce, separation, death, families who have two parents who are not married but have children, or families with same-sex parents. With [[artificial insemination]], [[surrogate mother]]s, and [[adoption]], families do not have to be formed by the heteronormative biological union of a male and a female. <ref>{{cite journal |title=The Widening Concept of Parent in Canada: Step- Parents, Same-Sex Partners, & Parents by ART |journal=American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law |year=2012 |last1=Bala |first1=Nicholas |last2=Ashbourne |first2=Christine |volume=30 |issue=3 |url=https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1577&context=jgspl&httpsredir=1&referer= |accessdate=4 July 2021 }}</ref>


The consequences of these changes for the adults and children involved are heavily debated. In a 2009 [[Massachusetts]] spousal benefits case, developmental psychologist [[Michael Lamb (psychologist)|Michael Lamb]] testified that parental sexual orientation does not negatively affect childhood development. "Since the end of the 1980s... it has been well established that children and adolescents can adjust just as well in nontraditional settings as in traditional settings," he argued.<ref>Michael Lamb, Ph.D.: [https://www.webcitation.org/5n2qV1QIk?url=http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/2009-11-17-doma-aff-lamb.pdf Affidavit – United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (2009)]</ref> However, columnist [[Maggie Gallagher]] argues that heteronormative social structures are beneficial to society because they are optimal for the raising of children.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/SenateSept42003.pdf |title=Why Marriage Matters: The Case for Normal Marriage. Testimony before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights Hearing: "What is needed to defend the Bipartisan Defense of Marriage Act of 1996?" |author=Maggie Gallagher |publisher=Institute for Marriage and Public Policy |date=2003-09-04 |access-date=2012-05-22}}</ref> Australian-Canadian ethicist [[Margaret Somerville]] argues that "giving same-sex couples the right to found a family unlinks parenthood from biology".<ref>[http://www.unisa.edu.au/hawkecentre/events/2007events/MSomerville_InConversation.asp Margaret Somerville – In Conversation] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081205100541/http://www.unisa.edu.au/hawkecentre/events/2007events/MSomerville_InConversation.asp |date=2008-12-05 }}</ref> Recent criticisms of this argument have been made by Timothy Laurie, who argues that both [[intersex]] conditions and [[infertility]] rates have always complicated links between biology, marriage, and child-rearing.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Laurie |first1=Timothy |title=Bigotry or biology: the hard choice for an opponent of marriage equality |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-03/laurie-bigotry-or-biology/6514156 |work=ABC News |date=3 June 2015 }}</ref>
The consequences of these changes for the adults and children involved are heavily debated. In a 2009 [[Massachusetts]] spousal benefits case, developmental psychologist [[Michael Lamb (psychologist)|Michael Lamb]] testified that parental sexual orientation does not negatively affect childhood development. "Since the end of the 1980s... it has been well established that children and adolescents can adjust just as well in nontraditional settings as in traditional settings," he argued.<ref>Michael Lamb, Ph.D.: [https://www.webcitation.org/5n2qV1QIk?url=http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/2009-11-17-doma-aff-lamb.pdf Affidavit – United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (2009)]</ref> However, columnist [[Maggie Gallagher]] argues that heteronormative social structures are beneficial to society because they are optimal for the raising of children.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/SenateSept42003.pdf |title=Why Marriage Matters: The Case for Normal Marriage. Testimony before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights Hearing: "What is needed to defend the Bipartisan Defense of Marriage Act of 1996?" |author=Maggie Gallagher |publisher=Institute for Marriage and Public Policy |date=4 September 2003 |access-date=22 May 2012}}</ref> Australian-Canadian ethicist [[Margaret Somerville]] argues that "giving same-sex couples the right to found a family unlinks parenthood from biology".<ref>[http://www.unisa.edu.au/hawkecentre/events/2007events/MSomerville_InConversation.asp Margaret Somerville – In Conversation] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081205100541/http://www.unisa.edu.au/hawkecentre/events/2007events/MSomerville_InConversation.asp |date=5 December 2008 }}</ref> Recent criticisms of this argument have been made by Timothy Laurie, who argues that both [[intersex]] conditions and [[infertility]] rates have always complicated links between biology, marriage, and child-rearing.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Laurie |first1=Timothy |title=Bigotry or biology: the hard choice for an opponent of marriage equality |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-03/laurie-bigotry-or-biology/6514156 |work=ABC News |date=3 June 2015 }}</ref>


A subset of heteronormativity is the concept of heteronormative temporality. This ideology states that the ultimate life goal for society is heterosexual marriage. Societal factors pressure humans to engage in the roles of the traditional nuclear family structure, which include searching for a partner of the opposite sex, engaging in a heterosexual marriage, and having children. Heteronormative temporality promotes [[abstinence]]-only until marriage. Many American parents adhere to this heteronormative narrative and teach it to their children. According to Amy T. Schalet, it seems that the bulk of parent-child sex education revolves around [[Abstinence-only sex education|abstinence-only]] practices in the United States, but this differs in other parts of the world.<ref>Schalet, Amy T. Not under My Roof: Parents, Teens, and the Culture of Sex. Chicago: U of Chicago, 2011. {{ISBN|978-0-226-73618-1}}</ref> Similarly, George Washington University Professor, Abby Wilkerson, discusses how the healthcare and medicinal industries reinforce the views of heterosexual marriage to promote heteronormative temporality. The concept of heteronormative temporality extends beyond heterosexual marriage to include a pervasive system where heterosexuality is seen as a standard, and anything outside of that realm is not tolerated. Wilkerson explains that it dictates aspects of everyday life such as nutritional health, socio-economic status, personal beliefs, and traditional gender roles.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wilkerson |first1=Abby |title=I Want to Hold Your Hand: Abstinence Curricula, Bioethics, and the Silencing of Desire |journal=Journal of Medical Humanities |date=June 2013 |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=101–108 |doi=10.1007/s10912-013-9213-0 |pmid=23468394 |s2cid=35152974 }}</ref>
A subset of heteronormativity is the concept of heteronormative temporality. This ideology states that the ultimate life goal for society is heterosexual marriage. Societal factors pressure humans to engage in the roles of the traditional nuclear family structure, which include searching for a partner of the opposite sex, engaging in a heterosexual marriage, and having children. Heteronormative temporality promotes [[abstinence]]-only until marriage. Many American parents adhere to this heteronormative narrative and teach it to their children. According to Amy T. Schalet, it seems that the bulk of parent-child sex education revolves around [[Abstinence-only sex education|abstinence-only]] practices in the United States, but this differs in other parts of the world.<ref>Schalet, Amy T. Not under My Roof: Parents, Teens, and the Culture of Sex. Chicago: U of Chicago, 2011. {{ISBN|978-0-226-73618-1}}</ref> Similarly, George Washington University Professor, Abby Wilkerson, discusses how the healthcare and medicinal industries reinforce the views of heterosexual marriage to promote heteronormative temporality. The concept of heteronormative temporality extends beyond heterosexual marriage to include a pervasive system where heterosexuality is seen as a standard, and anything outside of that realm is not tolerated. Wilkerson explains that it dictates aspects of everyday life such as nutritional health, socio-economic status, personal beliefs, and traditional gender roles.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wilkerson |first1=Abby |title=I Want to Hold Your Hand: Abstinence Curricula, Bioethics, and the Silencing of Desire |journal=Journal of Medical Humanities |date=June 2013 |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=101–108 |doi=10.1007/s10912-013-9213-0 |pmid=23468394 |s2cid=35152974 }}</ref>
Line 37: Line 27:


===Transgender people===
===Transgender people===
Transgender people experience a mismatch between their [[gender identity]] and their [[Sex assignment|assigned sex]].<ref>[http://www.stroud.gov.uk/info/gender_equality_scheme.pdf Stroud District Council "Gender Equality SCHEME AND ACTION PLAN 2007"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080227114158/http://www.stroud.gov.uk/info/gender_equality_scheme.pdf |date=2008-02-27 }}, defines the state of being ''transgender'' as "Non-identification with, or non-presentation as, the sex (and assumed gender) one was assigned at birth."</ref><ref name="glaad.org">Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. [http://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender "GLAAD Media Reference Guide – Transgender glossary of terms"], "[[GLAAD]]", USA, May 2010. Retrieved on 2011-02-24. "An umbrella term for people whose gender identity and/or gender expression differs from what is typically associated with the sex they were assigned at birth."</ref><ref name="usi">"[https://web.archive.org/web/20080608075230/http://www.usilgbt.org/index.php?categoryid=35 USI LGBT Campaign – Transgender Campaign]" (retrieved 11 January 2012) defines ''transgender people'' as "People who were assigned a sex, usually at birth and based on their genitals, but who feel that this is a false or incomplete description of themselves."</ref> ''Transgender'' is also an [[umbrella term]] because, in addition to including [[trans men]] and [[trans women]] whose [[gender binary|binary gender]] identity is the opposite of their assigned sex (and who are sometimes specifically termed ''[[transsexual]]'' if they desire medical assistance to [[transitioning (transgender)|transition]]), it may include [[genderqueer]] people (whose identities are not exclusively masculine or feminine, but may, for example, be [[bigender]], [[pangender]], genderfluid, or agender).<ref name="glaad.org" /><ref name="Bilodeau">{{cite journal |last1=Bilodeau |first1=Brent |title=Beyond the Gender Binary: A Case Study of Two Transgender Students at a Midwestern Research University |journal=Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education |date=29 December 2005 |volume=3 |issue=1 |pages=29–44 |doi=10.1300/J367v03n01_05 |s2cid=144070536 }}</ref><ref name="Layton">{{cite journal |last1=Layton |first1=Lynne |title=In Defense of Gender Ambiguity: Jessica Benjamin. Gender & Psychoanalysis. I, 1996. Pp. 27-43 |journal=Psychoanalytic Quarterly |volume=67 |issue=2 |year=1998 |pages=341 |url=https://www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=paq.067.0341a }}</ref> Other definitions include [[third-gender]] people as transgender or conceptualize transgender people as a third gender,<ref name="Stryker3G">Susan Stryker, Stephen Whittle, ''The Transgender Studies Reader'' ({{ISBN|1-135-39884-4}}), page 666: "The authors note that, increasingly, in social science literature, the term “third gender” is being replaced by or conflated with the newer term “transgender.”</ref><ref name="Chrisler">Joan C. Chrisler, Donald R. McCreary, ''Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology'', volume 1 (2010, {{ISBN|1-4419-1465-X}}), page 486: "Transgender is a broad term characterized by a challenge of traditional gender roles and gender identity[. …] For example, some cultures classify transgender individuals as a third gender, thereby treating this phenomenon as normative."</ref> and infrequently the term is defined very broadly to include [[cross-dresser]]s.<ref name="ReisnerEtAl">{{cite journal |last1=Reisner |first1=Sari L. |last2=Conron |first2=Kerith |last3=Scout |first3=Nfn |last4=Mimiaga |first4=Matthew J. |last5=Haneuse |first5=Sebastien |last6=Austin |first6=S. Bryn |title=Comparing In-Person and Online Survey Respondents in the U.S. National Transgender Discrimination Survey: Implications for Transgender Health Research |journal=LGBT Health |date=June 2014 |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=98–106 |doi=10.1089/lgbt.2013.0018 |pmid=26789619 }}</ref>
Transgender people experience a mismatch between their [[gender identity]] and their [[Sex assignment|assigned sex]].<ref>[http://www.stroud.gov.uk/info/gender_equality_scheme.pdf Stroud District Council "Gender Equality SCHEME AND ACTION PLAN 2007"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080227114158/http://www.stroud.gov.uk/info/gender_equality_scheme.pdf |date=27 February 2008 }}, defines the state of being ''transgender'' as "Non-identification with, or non-presentation as, the sex (and assumed gender) one was assigned at birth."</ref><ref name="glaad.org">Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. [http://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender "GLAAD Media Reference Guide – Transgender glossary of terms"], "[[GLAAD]]", USA, May 2010. Retrieved on 24 February 2011. "An umbrella term for people whose gender identity and/or gender expression differs from what is typically associated with the sex they were assigned at birth."</ref><ref name="usi">"[https://web.archive.org/web/20080608075230/http://www.usilgbt.org/index.php?categoryid=35 USI LGBT Campaign – Transgender Campaign]" (retrieved 11 January 2012) defines ''transgender people'' as "People who were assigned a sex, usually at birth and based on their genitals, but who feel that this is a false or incomplete description of themselves."</ref> ''Transgender'' is also an [[umbrella term]] because, it includes [[trans men]] and [[trans women]] who may be [[gender binary|binary]] or non-binary, and also includes [[genderqueer]] people (whose identities are not exclusively masculine or feminine, but may, for example, be [[bigender]], [[pangender]], [[genderfluid]], etc.). Some authors also believe that the trans umbrella includes ''[[transsexual]]'' people, who have [[transitioning (transgender)|transition]]ed through hormonal replacement therapy and sex reassignment surgery.<ref name="glaad.org" /><ref name="Bilodeau">{{cite journal |last1=Bilodeau |first1=Brent |title=Beyond the Gender Binary: A Case Study of Two Transgender Students at a Midwestern Research University |journal=Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education |date=29 December 2005 |volume=3 |issue=1 |pages=29–44 |doi=10.1300/J367v03n01_05 |s2cid=144070536 }}</ref><ref name="Layton">{{cite journal |last1=Layton |first1=Lynne |title=In Defense of Gender Ambiguity: Jessica Benjamin. Gender & Psychoanalysis. I, 1996. Pp. 27-43 |journal=Psychoanalytic Quarterly |volume=67 |issue=2 |year=1998 |pages=341 |url=https://www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=paq.067.0341a}}</ref>


Other definitions include [[third-gender]] people as transgender or conceptualize transgender people as a third gender,<ref name="Stryker3G">Susan Stryker, Stephen Whittle, ''The Transgender Studies Reader'' ({{ISBN|1-135-39884-4}}), page 666: "The authors note that, increasingly, in social science literature, the term "third gender" is being replaced by or conflated with the newer term "transgender."</ref><ref name="Chrisler">Joan C. Chrisler, Donald R. McCreary, ''Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology'', volume 1 (2010, {{ISBN|1-4419-1465-X}}), page 486: "Transgender is a broad term characterized by a challenge of traditional gender roles and gender identity[. …] For example, some cultures classify transgender individuals as a third gender, thereby treating this phenomenon as normative."</ref> and infrequently the term is defined very broadly to include [[cross-dresser]]s.<ref name="ReisnerEtAl">{{cite journal |last1=Reisner |first1=Sari L. |last2=Conron |first2=Kerith |last3=Scout |first3=Nfn |last4=Mimiaga |first4=Matthew J. |last5=Haneuse |first5=Sebastien |last6=Austin |first6=S. Bryn |title=Comparing In-Person and Online Survey Respondents in the U.S. National Transgender Discrimination Survey: Implications for Transgender Health Research |journal=LGBT Health |date=June 2014 |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=98–106 |doi=10.1089/lgbt.2013.0018 |pmid=26789619 }}</ref>
Some transgender people seek [[sex reassignment therapy]], and may not behave according to the gender role imposed by society. Some societies consider transgender behavior a crime worthy of capital punishment, including [[Saudi Arabia]]<ref>[http://www.ifge.org/news/1998/sept/nws9278.htm Saudis Arrest 5 Pakistani TGs]</ref> and many other nations. In some cases, gay or lesbian people were forced to undergo sex change treatments to "fix" their [[sex or gender]]: in some [[Europe|European countries]] during the 20th century,<ref>[http://www.slate.com/id/2660/ The Unkindest Cut | The science and ethics of castration]</ref><ref>[http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/turing_a,2.html Turing, Alan (1912–1954)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090901020647/http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/turing_a%2C2.html |date=2009-09-01 }}</ref> and in [[South Africa]] in the 1970s and 1980s.<ref>{{cite news |last1=McGreal |first1=Chris |title=Gays tell of mutilation by apartheid army |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/jul/29/chrismcgreal |work=The Guardian |date=29 July 2000 }}</ref>


Some transgender people seek [[sex reassignment therapy]], and may not behave according to the gender role imposed by society. Some societies consider transgender behavior a crime worthy of capital punishment, including [[Saudi Arabia]]<ref>[http://www.ifge.org/news/1998/sept/nws9278.htm Saudis Arrest 5 Pakistani TGs]</ref> and many other nations. In some cases, gay or lesbian people were forced to undergo sex change treatments to "fix" their [[sex and gender]] in some [[Europe|European countries]] during the 20th century,<ref>[http://www.slate.com/id/2660/ The Unkindest Cut | The science and ethics of castration]</ref><ref>[http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/turing_a,2.html Turing, Alan (1912–1954)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090901020647/http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/turing_a%2C2.html |date=1 September 2009 }}</ref> and in [[South Africa]] in the 1970s and 1980s.<ref>{{cite news |last1=McGreal |first1=Chris |title=Gays tell of mutilation by apartheid army |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/jul/29/chrismcgreal |work=The Guardian |date=29 July 2000 }}</ref>
In some countries,{{which|date=January 2023}} including North American<ref name="cider"/> and European countries, certain forms of violence against transgender people may be tacitly endorsed when prosecutors and juries refuse to investigate, prosecute, or convict those who perform the murders and beatings.<ref name="cider">{{cite journal |last1=Frye |first1=Phyllis |title=The International Bill of Gender Rights vs. The Cider House Rules: Transgenders Struggle with the Courts Over What Clothing They Are Allowed to Wear on the Job, Which Restroom They are Allowed to Use on the Job, Their Right to Marry, and the Very Definition of Their Sex |journal=William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice |date=1 October 2000 |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=133 |url=https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol7/iss1/6/ }}</ref><ref name="AmnestyUSA">{{cite news|url=http://www.amnestyusa.org/outfront/jamaica_report.html|title=OUTfront! Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgendered Human Rights:"Battybwoys affi dead" Action against homophobia in Jamaica|date=May 7, 2004|publisher=AmnestyUSA.org|access-date=4 June 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100602192314/http://www.amnestyusa.org/outfront/jamaica_report.html|archive-date=2 June 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=276 |title=SPLCenter.org: 'Disposable People'<!-- Bot generated title --> |access-date=2004-06-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140711020836/http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=276 |archive-date=2014-07-11 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Other societies have considered transgender behavior as a [[psychiatric illness]] serious enough to justify [[institutionalization]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.trans-health.com/2001/medicalization-of-transgenderism/|title=The Medicalization of Transgenderism - Trans Health|date=2001-07-18|newspaper=Trans Health|language=en-US|access-date=2017-02-05}}</ref>


In some countries,{{which|date=January 2023}} including North American<ref name="cider"/> and European countries, certain forms of violence against transgender people may be tacitly endorsed when prosecutors and juries refuse to investigate, prosecute, or convict those who perform the murders and beatings.<ref name="cider">{{cite journal |last1=Frye |first1=Phyllis |title=The International Bill of Gender Rights vs. The Cider House Rules: Transgenders Struggle with the Courts Over What Clothing They Are Allowed to Wear on the Job, Which Restroom They are Allowed to Use on the Job, Their Right to Marry, and the Very Definition of Their Sex |journal=William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice |date=1 October 2000 |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=133 |url=https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol7/iss1/6/ }}</ref><ref name="AmnestyUSA">{{cite news|url=http://www.amnestyusa.org/outfront/jamaica_report.html|title=OUTfront! Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgendered Human Rights:"Battybwoys affi dead" Action against homophobia in Jamaica|date=7 May 2004|publisher=AmnestyUSA.org|access-date=4 June 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100602192314/http://www.amnestyusa.org/outfront/jamaica_report.html|archive-date=2 June 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=276 |title=SPLCenter.org: 'Disposable People'<!-- Bot generated title --> |access-date=10 June 2004 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140711020836/http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=276 |archive-date=11 July 2014 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Other societies have considered transgender behavior as a [[psychiatric illness]] serious enough to justify [[institutionalization]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.trans-health.com/2001/medicalization-of-transgenderism/|title=The Medicalization of Transgenderism - Trans Health|date=18 July 2001|newspaper=Trans Health|language=en-US|access-date=5 February 2017}}</ref>
In medical communities with these restrictions, patients have the option of either suppressing transsexual behavior and conforming to the norms of their birth sex (which may be necessary to avoid social stigma or even violence) or by adhering strictly to the norms of their "new" sex in order to qualify for sex reassignment surgery and hormonal treatments. Attempts to achieve an ambiguous or "alternative" gender identity would not be supported or allowed.<ref name="Todd">{{cite journal |last=Weiss |first=Jillian Todd |title=The Gender Caste System: Identity, Privacy and Heteronormativity |journal=Law & Sexuality|volume=10|pages=123–186|publisher=Tulane Law School |year=2001 |url=http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~jweiss/tulane.pdf |access-date=2007-02-25 |archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20070621130831/http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~jweiss/tulane.pdf |archive-date=2007-06-21 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Sometimes sex reassignment surgery is a requirement for an official gender change, and often "male" and "female" are the only choices available, even for intersex and non-binary people.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Tranter |first1=Chi |title=Norrie's 'ungendered' status withdrawn |url=https://www.smh.com.au/national/norries-ungendered-status-withdrawn-20100318-qhw5.html |work=The Sydney Morning Herald |date=18 March 2010 }}</ref> For governments which allow only heterosexual marriages, official gender changes can have implications for related rights and privileges, such as child custody, inheritance, and medical decision-making.<ref name="Todd" />

In medical communities with these restrictions, patients have the option of either suppressing transsexual behavior and conforming to the norms of their birth sex (which may be necessary to avoid social stigma or even violence) or by adhering strictly to the norms of their "new" sex in order to qualify for sex reassignment surgery and hormonal treatments. Attempts to achieve an ambiguous or "alternative" gender identity would not be supported or allowed.<ref name="Todd">{{cite journal |last=Weiss |first=Jillian Todd |title=The Gender Caste System: Identity, Privacy and Heteronormativity |journal=Law & Sexuality|volume=10|pages=123–186|publisher=Tulane Law School |year=2001 |url=http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~jweiss/tulane.pdf |access-date=25 February 2007 |archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20070621130831/http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~jweiss/tulane.pdf |archive-date=21 June 2007 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Sometimes sex reassignment surgery is a requirement for a legal sex change, and often "male" and "female" are the only choices available, even for intersex and non-binary people.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Tranter |first1=Chi |title=Norrie's 'ungendered' status withdrawn |url=https://www.smh.com.au/national/norries-ungendered-status-withdrawn-20100318-qhw5.html |work=The Sydney Morning Herald |date=18 March 2010 }}</ref> For governments which allow only heterosexual marriages, official gender changes can have implications for related rights and privileges, such as child custody, inheritance, and medical decision-making.<ref name="Todd" />


==Homonormativity==
==Homonormativity==
{{main|homonormativity}}
{{main|Homonormativity}}
Homonormativity is a term which can refer to the privileging of [[homosexuality]]<ref>{{cite book|year=2010|chapter=Gender, Sexuality, Culture and the Closet in Theme Park Parades|author=David Orzechowitz|title=Gender and Sexuality in the Workplace|editor=Christine L. Williams|editor2=Kirsten Dellinger|publisher=Emerald Group|isbn=978-1-8485-5371-2|page=241|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JsXXD9n2zvAC&pg=PA241|quote=The dominance of a '''homonormative''' culture in Parades subordinates male heterosexuality to male homosexuality.}}</ref> or the assimilation of heteronormative ideals and constructs into [[LGBTQ]] culture and individual identity.<ref name=PSN>{{cite web|title=Homonormativity |url=http://web.uvic.ca/psn/resources/terminology/homonormativity/ |website=web.uvic.ca |publisher=Positive Space Network |access-date=3 January 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702182226/http://web.uvic.ca/psn/resources/terminology/homonormativity/ |archive-date=2 July 2015 }}</ref> Specifically, Catherine Connell states that homonormativity "emphasizes commonality with the norms of heterosexual culture, including marriage, monogamy, procreation, and productivity".<ref name=":0">Connell, Catherine. School's Out : Gay and Lesbian Teachers in the Classroom (1). Berkeley, US: University of California Press, 2014. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 15 March 2017.</ref><ref>Queer Twin Cities. Minneapolis, US: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 15 March 2017.</ref> The term is almost always used in its latter sense, and was used prominently by Lisa Duggan in 2003,<ref name="Duggan, Lisa 2003">Duggan, Lisa. The Twilight of Equality?: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack On Democracy. Beacon Press, 2003.</ref> although transgender studies scholar [[Susan Stryker]], in her article "Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinary",<ref name="Stryker 2008">{{cite journal |last1=Stryker |first1=Susan |title=Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity |journal=Radical History Review |date=1 January 2008 |volume=2008 |issue=100 |pages=145–157 |doi=10.1215/01636545-2007-026 }}</ref> noted that it was also used by transgender activists in the 1990s in reference to the imposition of gay/lesbian norms over the concerns of transgender people.<ref name="Stryker 2008"/><ref>{{cite book |last1=Cover |first1=Rob |title=Queer Youth Suicide, Culture and Identity: Unliveable Lives? |date=2016 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-07255-3 }}{{pn|date=February 2021}}</ref> Transgender people were not included in healthcare programs combating the AIDS epidemic, and were often excluded from gay/lesbian demonstrations in Washington, D.C.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Stryker |first1=Susan |title=Transgender History |date=2008 |publisher=Seal Press |isbn=978-1-58005-224-5 }}{{pn|date=February 2021}}</ref> Homonormativity has also grown to include transnormativity, or "the pressure put on trans people to conform to traditional, oppositional sexist understandings of gender".<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title=The Politics of Everybody|last=Lewis|first=Holly|publisher=Zed Books Ltd.|year=2016|isbn=978-1-78360-287-2|location=London|pages=222–230}}</ref> In addition, homonormativity can be used today to cover or erase the radical politics of the queer community during the [[Gay liberation|Gay Liberation Movement]],<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite book |last1=Duggan |first1=Lisa |chapter=The New Homonormativity: The Sexual Politics of Neoliberalism |pages=175–194 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=O_7qRCNxzQcC&pg=PA175 |editor1-last=Castronovo |editor1-first=Russ |editor2-last=Nelson |editor2-first=Dana D. |title=Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics |date=2002 |publisher=Duke University Press |isbn=978-0-8223-8390-1 }}</ref> by not only replacing these politics with more conservative goals like marriage equality and adoption rights, but also commercializing and mainstreaming queer subcultures.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite book|title=Sex, Needs and Queer Culture|last=Alderson|first=David|publisher=Zed Books Ltd|year=2016|isbn=978-1-78360-512-5|location=London}}{{pn|date=February 2021}}</ref>
Homonormativity is a term which can refer to the privileging of [[homosexuality]]<ref>{{cite book|year=2010|chapter=Gender, Sexuality, Culture and the Closet in Theme Park Parades|author=David Orzechowitz|title=Gender and Sexuality in the Workplace|editor=Christine L. Williams|editor2=Kirsten Dellinger|publisher=Emerald Group|isbn=978-1-8485-5371-2|page=241|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JsXXD9n2zvAC&pg=PA241|quote=The dominance of a '''homonormative''' culture in Parades subordinates male heterosexuality to male homosexuality.}}</ref> or the assimilation of heteronormative ideals and constructs into [[LGBTQ]] culture and individual identity.<ref name=PSN>{{cite web|title=Homonormativity |url=http://web.uvic.ca/psn/resources/terminology/homonormativity/ |website=web.uvic.ca |publisher=Positive Space Network |access-date=3 January 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702182226/http://web.uvic.ca/psn/resources/terminology/homonormativity/ |archive-date=2 July 2015 }}</ref> Specifically, Catherine Connell states that homonormativity "emphasizes commonality with the norms of heterosexual culture, including marriage, monogamy, procreation, and productivity".<ref name=":0">Connell, Catherine. School's Out : Gay and Lesbian Teachers in the Classroom (1). Berkeley, US: University of California Press, 2014. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 15 March 2017.</ref><ref>Queer Twin Cities. Minneapolis, US: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 15 March 2017.</ref> The term is almost always used in its latter sense, and was used prominently by Lisa Duggan in 2003,<ref name="Duggan, Lisa 2003">Duggan, Lisa. The Twilight of Equality?: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack On Democracy. Beacon Press, 2003.</ref> although transgender studies scholar [[Susan Stryker]], in her article "Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinary",<ref name="Stryker 2008">{{cite journal |last1=Stryker |first1=Susan |title=Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity |journal=Radical History Review |date=1 January 2008 |volume=2008 |issue=100 |pages=145–157 |doi=10.1215/01636545-2007-026 }}</ref> noted that it was also used by transgender activists in the 1990s in reference to the imposition of gay/lesbian norms over the concerns of transgender people.<ref name="Stryker 2008"/><ref>{{cite book |last1=Cover |first1=Rob |title=Queer Youth Suicide, Culture and Identity: Unliveable Lives? |date=2016 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-07255-3 }}{{pn|date=February 2021}}</ref> Transgender people were not included in healthcare programs combating the AIDS epidemic, and were often excluded from gay/lesbian demonstrations in Washington, D.C.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Stryker |first1=Susan |title=Transgender History |date=2008 |publisher=Seal Press |isbn=978-1-58005-224-5 }}{{pn|date=February 2021}}</ref> Homonormativity has also grown to include transnormativity, or "the pressure put on trans people to conform to traditional, oppositional sexist understandings of gender".<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title=The Politics of Everybody|last=Lewis|first=Holly|publisher=Zed Books Ltd.|year=2016|isbn=978-1-78360-287-2|location=London|pages=222–230}}</ref> In addition, homonormativity can be used today to cover or erase the radical politics of the queer community during the [[Gay liberation|Gay Liberation Movement]],<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite book |last1=Duggan |first1=Lisa |chapter=The New Homonormativity: The Sexual Politics of Neoliberalism |pages=175–194 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=O_7qRCNxzQcC&pg=PA175 |editor1-last=Castronovo |editor1-first=Russ |editor2-last=Nelson |editor2-first=Dana D. |title=Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics |date=2002 |publisher=Duke University Press |isbn=978-0-8223-8390-1 }}</ref> by not only replacing these politics with more conservative goals like marriage equality and [[Same-sex adoption|adoption rights]], but also commercializing and mainstreaming queer subcultures.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite book|title=Sex, Needs and Queer Culture|last=Alderson|first=David|publisher=Zed Books Ltd|year=2016|isbn=978-1-78360-512-5|location=London}}{{pn|date=February 2021}}</ref>


According to Penny Griffin, Politics and International Relations lecturer at the [[University of New South Wales]], homonormativity upholds [[neoliberalism]] rather than critiquing the enforcement of [[monogamy]], procreation, and [[Gender binary|binary gender roles]] as inherently [[heterosexist]] and [[racist]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Griffin |first1=Penny |title=Sexing the Economy in a Neo-Liberal World Order: Neo-Liberal Discourse and the (Re)Production of Heteronormative Heterosexuality |journal=The British Journal of Politics and International Relations |date=May 2007 |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=220–238 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00280.x |s2cid=144295490 }}</ref> In this sense, homonormativity is deeply intertwined with the expansion and maintenance of the internationally structured and structuring capitalistic worldwide system.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Stryker |first1=S. |title=Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity |journal=Radical History Review |date=1 January 2008 |volume=2008 |issue=100 |pages=145–157 |doi=10.1215/01636545-2007-026 }}</ref> Duggan asserts that homonormativity fragments LGBT communities into hierarchies of worthiness, and that LGBT people that come the closest to mimicking heteronormative standards of gender identity are deemed most worthy of receiving rights. She also states that LGBT individuals at the bottom of this hierarchy (e.g. [[Bisexual community|bisexual people]], [[Transgender|trans people]], [[Genderqueer|non-binary people]], people of [[Gender systems#Non-European gender systems|non-Western genders]], [[intersex]] people, queers of color, queer sex workers) are seen as an impediment to this class of homonormative individuals receiving their rights.<ref name="Duggan, Lisa 2003" /><ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite book|last=Ferguson |first=Roderick A. |chapter=Race-ing Homonormativity: Citizenship, Sociology, and Gay Identity |title=Black Queer Studies: A Critical Anthology |editor=E. Patrick Johnson|editor2=Mae G. Henderson|publisher=Duke University Press|date=2005|pages=52–67|isbn=978-0-8223-8722-0|doi=10.1215/9780822387220}}</ref> For example, one empirical study found that in the Netherlands, transgender people and other gender non-conforming LGBT people are often looked down upon within their communities for not acting "normal". Those who do assimilate often become invisible in society and experience constant fear and shame about the non-conformers within their communities.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Robinson |first1=Brandon Andrew |title=Is This What Equality Looks Like?: How Assimilation Marginalizes the Dutch LGBT Community |journal=Sexuality Research and Social Policy |date=December 2012 |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=327–336 |doi=10.1007/s13178-012-0084-3 |s2cid=146137993 }}</ref> Stryker referenced theorist [[Jürgen Habermas]] and his view of the public sphere allowing for individuals to come together, as a group, to discuss diverse ideologies and by excluding the non-conforming LGBTQ community, society as a whole were undoubtedly excluding the gender-variant individuals from civic participation.<ref name="Stryker 2008"/>
According to Penny Griffin, Politics and International Relations lecturer at the [[University of New South Wales]], homonormativity upholds [[neoliberalism]] rather than critiquing the enforcement of its values of [[monogamy]], procreation, and [[Gender binary|binary gender roles]] as inherently [[heterosexist]] and [[racist]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Griffin |first1=Penny |title=Sexing the Economy in a Neo-Liberal World Order: Neo-Liberal Discourse and the (Re)Production of Heteronormative Heterosexuality |journal=The British Journal of Politics and International Relations |date=May 2007 |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=220–238 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00280.x |s2cid=144295490 }}</ref> In this sense, homonormativity is deeply intertwined with the expansion and maintenance of the internationally structured and structuring capitalistic worldwide system.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Stryker |first1=S. |title=Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity |journal=Radical History Review |date=1 January 2008 |volume=2008 |issue=100 |pages=145–157 |doi=10.1215/01636545-2007-026 }}</ref> Duggan asserts that homonormativity fragments LGBT communities into hierarchies of worthiness, and that LGBT people that come the closest to mimicking heteronormative standards of gender identity are deemed most worthy of receiving rights. She also states that LGBT individuals at the bottom of this hierarchy (e.g. [[Bisexual community|bisexual people]], [[Transgender|trans people]], [[Genderqueer|non-binary people]], people of [[Gender systems#Non-European gender systems|non-Western genders]], [[intersex]] people, queers of color, queer sex workers) are seen as an impediment to this class of homonormative individuals receiving their rights.<ref name="Duggan, Lisa 2003" /><ref name=":0" /><ref>{{cite book|last=Ferguson |first=Roderick A. |chapter=Race-ing Homonormativity: Citizenship, Sociology, and Gay Identity |title=Black Queer Studies: A Critical Anthology |editor=E. Patrick Johnson|editor2=Mae G. Henderson|publisher=Duke University Press|date=2005|pages=52–67|isbn=978-0-8223-8722-0|doi=10.1215/9780822387220}}</ref> For example, one empirical study found that in the Netherlands, transgender people and other gender non-conforming LGBT people are often looked down upon within their communities for not acting "normal". Those who do assimilate often become invisible in society and experience constant fear and shame about the non-conformers within their communities.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Robinson |first1=Brandon Andrew |title=Is This What Equality Looks Like?: How Assimilation Marginalizes the Dutch LGBT Community |journal=Sexuality Research and Social Policy |date=December 2012 |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=327–336 |doi=10.1007/s13178-012-0084-3 |s2cid=146137993 }}</ref> Stryker referenced theorist [[Jürgen Habermas]] and his view of the public sphere allowing for individuals to come together, as a group, to discuss diverse ideologies and by excluding the non-conforming LGBTQ community, society as a whole were undoubtedly excluding the gender-variant individuals from civic participation.<ref name="Stryker 2008"/>


==Criticism==
== Media representation ==
Critics of heteronormative attitudes, such as [[Cathy J. Cohen]], [[Michael Warner]], and [[Lauren Berlant]],<ref name="Berlant98" /> argue that such attitudes are oppressive, stigmatizing, marginalizing of perceived deviant forms of sexuality and gender, and make self-expression more challenging when that expression does not conform to the norm.<ref name=lovaas>{{cite book |last1=Leap |first1=William |editor1-last=Lovaas |editor1-first=Karen E. |editor2-last=Jenkins |editor2-first=Mercilee M. |title=Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader |date=2007 |publisher=SAGE |location=California, USA |isbn=978-1-4129-1443-7 |pages=95–107 |language=en |chapter=Language, Socialization and Silence in Gay Adolescence". Section (from p. 98): "Charting a Path through the 'Desert of Nothing' |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fTRcvkxWV-IC}}</ref><ref name="OutatWork"/> Heteronormativity describes how social institutions and policies reinforce the presumption that people are heterosexual and that gender and sex are natural binaries.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Gender in Communication|last = DeFrancisco|first = Victoria|publisher = SAGE Publication, Inc.|year = 2014|isbn = 978-1-4522-2009-3|location = U.S.A|pages = 16}}</ref> Heteronormative culture privileges heterosexuality as normal and natural and fosters a climate where LGBT individuals are discriminated against in marriage, tax codes, and employment.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.rutgersuniversitypress.org/violence-against-queer-people/9780813573151|title=Violence against Queer People|last=Meyer|first=Doug|publisher=Rutgers University Press|year=2015}}</ref><ref name=OutatWork>{{cite book|last=Krupat|first=Kitty|title=Out at Work: Building a Gay-Labor Alliance|year=2001|publisher=U of Minnesota Press|isbn=978-0-8166-3741-6|pages=268}}</ref> Following Berlant and Warner, Laurie and Stark also argue that the domestic "intimate sphere" becomes "the unquestioned non‐place that anchors heteronormative public discourses, especially those concerning marriage and adoption rights".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Laurie |first1=Timothy |last2=Stark |first2=Hannah |title=Reconsidering Kinship: Beyond the Nuclear Family with Deleuze and Guattari |journal=Cultural Studies Review |date=28 April 2011 |volume=18 |issue=1 |doi=10.5130/csr.v18i1.1612 |doi-access=free |hdl=10453/44229 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>
Five different studies have shown that gay characters appearing on TV decreases the prejudice among viewers.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Stelter |first1=Brian |title=Gay on TV: It's All in the Family |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/business/media/gay-on-tv-its-all-in-the-family.html |work=The New York Times |date=9 May 2012 }}</ref> Cable and streaming services are beginning to include more characters who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender than broadcast television.<ref name="Egner">{{cite news |last1=Egner |first1=Jeremy |title=More Gay and Transgender Characters Are on TV, Report Shows |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/28/arts/television/more-gay-and-transgender-characters-are-on-tv-report-shows.html |work=The New York Times |date=27 October 2015 }}</ref> Cable and streaming services are lacking in diversity, according to a [[GLAAD]] report, with many of the LGBT characters being gay men (41% and 39% respectively).<ref name="Egner"/> The total number of LGBT characters counted on cable was reported to be 31% up from 2015, and bisexual representations saw an almost twofold increase.<ref name="Egner" />


According to cultural anthropologist [[Gayle Rubin]], heteronormativity in mainstream society creates a "sex hierarchy" that graduates sexual practices from morally "good sex" to "bad sex". The hierarchy considers reproductive, monogamous sex between committed heterosexuals as "good," whereas any sexual act or individual who falls short of this standard is labeled as "bad." Specifically, this standard categorizes long-term committed gay couples and non-monogamous/sexually active gay individuals between the two poles.<ref name="thinkingsex">{{cite book|author=Rubin, Gayle|chapter=Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality|editor=Vance, Carole|title=Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality|year=1993}}</ref> Patrick McCreery, lecturer at [[New York University]], argues that this hierarchy explains how gay people are stigmatized for socially "deviant" sexual practices that are often practiced by straight people as well, such as consumption of pornography or sex in public places.<ref name="OutatWork"/> There are many studies of sexual orientation discrimination on college campuses.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Byron |first1=Reginald A. |last2=Lowe |first2=Maria R. |last3=Billingsley |first3=Brianna |last4=Tuttle |first4=Nathan |title=Performativity Double Standards and the Sexual Orientation Climate at a Southern Liberal Arts University |journal=Journal of Homosexuality |date=16 April 2017 |volume=64 |issue=5 |pages=671–696 |doi=10.1080/00918369.2016.1196994 |pmid=27267937 |s2cid=20963768 }}</ref>
Intersex people are excluded almost completely from television, though about 1% of the population is intersex.<ref name="Kerry, Stephen 2011">{{cite journal |last1=Kerry |first1=Stephen |title=Representation of intersex in news media: the case of Kathleen Worrall |journal=Journal of Gender Studies |date=September 2011 |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=263–277 |doi=10.1080/09589236.2011.593325 |s2cid=144222294 }}</ref> News medias outline what it means to be male or female, which causes a gap for anyone who doesn't fall into those two categories.<ref name="Kerry, Stephen 2011"/> Newspapers have covered the topic of intersex athletes with the case of [[Caster Semenya]], where news spread of sporting officials having to determine whether she was to be considered female or male.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/08/20/gender.athlete.intersex/|title=Gender row athlete: What is intersexuality? |first= Stephanie |last=Busari|website=edition.cnn.com|access-date=2016-12-12}}</ref>


McCreery states that this heteronormative hierarchy carries over to the workplace, where gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals face discrimination such as anti-homosexual hiring policies or workplace discrimination that often leaves "lowest hierarchy" individuals such as transsexual people vulnerable to the most overt discrimination and unable to find work.<ref name="OutatWork"/>
Those who do not identify as either woman or man are gender non-binary, or gender non-conforming.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vijlbrief |first1=Afiah |last2=Saharso |first2=Sawitri |last3=Ghorashi |first3=Halleh |title=Transcending the gender binary: Gender non-binary young adults in Amsterdam |journal=Journal of LGBT Youth |date=2 January 2020 |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=89–106 |doi=10.1080/19361653.2019.1660295 |doi-access=free }}</ref> States in the United States are increasingly legalizing this "third" gender on official government documents as the existence of this identity is continuously debated among individuals.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Harmon |first1=Amy |title=Which Box Do You Check? Some States Are Offering a Nonbinary Option |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/29/us/nonbinary-drivers-licenses.html |work=The New York Times |date=29 May 2019 }}</ref> The controversy has resulted in minimal representation in the media, but recent television shows that have featured non-binary individuals include ''[[Ru Paul's Drag Race]]'' (2009–) and ''[[The Fosters (American TV series)|The Fosters]]'' (2013–2018).<ref>{{cite thesis |last1=Higley |first1=Diana |title=Bending the Binary: Effects of Nonbinary Gender Media Representations on Disposition Formation and Media Enjoyment |date=1 May 2019 |url=https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6290/ }}</ref> Members of the LGBTQ community claim that representation in media of non-binary people has not expanded to the extent of gender-conforming trans people.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://efniks.com/the-deep-dive-pages/2018/10/17/gender-isnt-a-haircut-how-representation-of-nonbinary-people-of-color-requires-more-than-white-androgyny|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181022024157/http://efniks.com/the-deep-dive-pages/2018/10/17/gender-isnt-a-haircut-how-representation-of-nonbinary-people-of-color-requires-more-than-white-androgyny|url-status=dead|archive-date=October 22, 2018|title=Gender Isn't A Haircut: How Representation of Nonbinary People of Color Requires More Than White Androgyny|website=EFNIKS.com|language=en-US|access-date=2020-04-07}}</ref>

Applicants and current employees can be legally passed over or fired for being non-heterosexual or perceived as non-heterosexual in many countries. An example of this practice is found in the case of the chain restaurant [[Cracker Barrel]], which [[Cracker Barrel#LGBT policies|garnered national attention in 1991]] after they fired an employee for being openly lesbian, citing their policy that employees with "sexual preferences that fail to demonstrate normal heterosexual values were inconsistent with traditional American values." Workers such as the fired employee and effeminate male waiters (allegedly described as the true targets),<ref name="OutatWork"/> were legally fired by work policies "transgressing" against "normal" heteronormative culture.<ref name="OutatWork"/>

Mustafa Bilgehan Ozturk analyzes the interconnectivity of heteronormativity and sexual employment discrimination by tracing the impact of patriarchal practices and institutions on the workplace experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual employees in a variety of contexts in Turkey. This further demonstrates the specific historicity and localized power/knowledge formations that give rise to physical, professional, and psycho-emotive acts of prejudice against sexual minorities.<ref name="SexualOrientationDiscrimination">{{cite journal |last1=Bilgehan Ozturk |first1=Mustafa |title=Sexual orientation discrimination: Exploring the experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual employees in Turkey |journal=Human Relations |date=August 2011 |volume=64 |issue=8 |pages=1099–1118 |doi=10.1177/0018726710396249 |s2cid=59439253 }}</ref>

Certain religions have been known to promote heteronormative beliefs through their teachings.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|url=http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/article/homosexuality-and-religion|title=Homosexuality and Religion {{!}} SexInfo Online|website=www.soc.ucsb.edu|access-date=21 March 2019|archive-date=14 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190614100124/http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/article/homosexuality-and-religion|url-status=dead}}</ref> According to Sociology professors Samuel Perry and Kara Snawder from The University of Oklahoma, multiple research studies in the past have shown that there can be and often is a link between the religious beliefs of Americans and homophobic behavior.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Perry |first1=Samuel L. |last2=Snawder |first2=Kara J. |title=Longitudinal Effects of Religious Media on Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage |journal=Sexuality & Culture |date=December 2016 |volume=20 |issue=4 |pages=785–804 |doi=10.1007/s12119-016-9357-y |s2cid=148173061 }}</ref> Out of the world's five major religions, the [[Abrahamic religions]]—Christianity, Judaism, and Islam—all uphold heteronormative views on marriage.<ref name=":2" /> Some examples of this playing out in recent years include the incident involving Kentucky clerk [[Kim Davis]], who refused to give marriage licenses to same-sex couples on the grounds that it violated her spiritual views,<ref>{{cite news |last1=Blinder |first1=Alan |last2=Lewin |first2=Tamar |title=Clerk in Kentucky Chooses Jail Over Deal on Same-Sex Marriage |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/04/us/kim-davis-same-sex-marriage.html |work=The New York Times |date=3 September 2015 }}</ref> as well as the Supreme Court ruling that a Colorado baker did not have to provide a wedding cake for a gay couple based on his religion.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_new2_22p3.pdf|title=Masterpiece Cake Shop, LTD v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission|date=21 March 2019|website=supremecourt.gov|publisher=Supreme Court of the United States}}</ref>

=== Media representation ===
Five different studies have shown that gay characters appearing on TV decreases the prejudice among viewers.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Stelter |first1=Brian |title=Gay on TV: It's All in the Family |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/business/media/gay-on-tv-its-all-in-the-family.html |work=The New York Times |date=9 May 2012 }}</ref> Cable and streaming services are beginning to include more characters who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender than broadcast television.<ref name="Egner">{{cite news |last1=Egner |first1=Jeremy |title=More Gay and Transgender Characters Are on TV, Report Shows |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/28/arts/television/more-gay-and-transgender-characters-are-on-tv-report-shows.html |work=The New York Times |date=27 October 2015 }}</ref> Cable and streaming services are lacking in diversity, according to a [[GLAAD]] report, with many of the LGBT characters being gay men (41% and 39% respectively).<ref name="Egner"/> The total number of LGBT characters counted on cable was reported to be 31% up from 2015, and bisexual representations saw an almost twofold increase.<ref name="Egner" />


Intersex people are excluded almost completely from television, though about 1% of the population is intersex.<ref name="Kerry, Stephen 2011">{{cite journal |last1=Kerry |first1=Stephen |title=Representation of intersex in news media: the case of Kathleen Worrall |journal=Journal of Gender Studies |date=September 2011 |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=263–277 |doi=10.1080/09589236.2011.593325 |s2cid=144222294 }}</ref> News medias outline what it means to be male or female, which causes a gap for anyone who doesn't fall into those two categories.<ref name="Kerry, Stephen 2011"/> Newspapers have covered the topic of intersex athletes with the case of [[Caster Semenya]], where news spread of sporting officials having to determine whether she was to be considered female or male.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/08/20/gender.athlete.intersex/|title=Gender row athlete: What is intersexuality? |first= Stephanie |last=Busari|website=edition.cnn.com|access-date=12 December 2016}}</ref>
In 2018, only 8.8% of broadcast television has an LGBTQ person on the show.<ref>{{cite book |doi=10.4135/9781483371283.n173 |chapter=GLAAD |title=The SAGE Encyclopedia of LGBTQ Studies |year=2016 |isbn=978-1-4833-7130-6 }}</ref> Media portrays heterosexuality as "normal" in today's society so we see less homosexuality on television because of this.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Critical Media Studies: An Introduction|last=Ott, Matt|first=Brian L., Robert L|publisher=Wiley Blackwell|year=2014|isbn=978-1-118-55397-8|location=Chichester|pages=216–222}}</ref> There are many stereotypes that come with this, as it can be seen in advertising, newspapers, radio, and television. For example, mainstream media promote the idea that gay men are more likely to be attracted to advertisements that sell expensive, flamboyant, and possibly feminine products because of their assumed attitudes and way of life.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kates |first1=Steven M. |title=Making the Ad Perfectly Queer: Marketing 'Normality' to the Gay Men's Community? |journal=Journal of Advertising |date=March 1999 |volume=28 |issue=1 |pages=25–37 |doi=10.1080/00913367.1999.10673574 }}</ref> Homosexuals and heterosexuals are also differentiated in the movies as well. Homosexual characters are predominantly seen in movies with issues regarding sexuality and the character is presented as homosexual.<ref>{{cite book |title=America on film: representing race, class, gender, and sexuality at the movies |date=1 August 2009 }}</ref> Television shows are also another aspect of media where there are stereotypes and negatively represented homosexuals. For example, the TV show ''Modern Family'' has two gay characters that are married and have a small adopted child together. Some may see this relationship as degrading and stereotypical of how the mainstream media views homosexuals. The show's sexual politics are considered fake {{by whom?|date=May 2021}} because of how their relationship is portrayed as overly colorful and excessively put together.<ref>{{cite book |first1=Tison |last1=Pugh |chapter=Conservative Narratology, Queer Politics, and the Humor of Gay Stereotypes in Modern Family |title=The Queer Fantasies of the American Family Sitcom |year=2019 |pages=161–189 |publisher=Rutgers University Press |isbn=978-0-8135-9175-9 |doi=10.36019/9780813591759-007 |jstor=j.ctt1trkkgj.9 |s2cid=242372791 }}</ref>


Those who do not identify as either woman or man are gender non-binary, or gender non-conforming.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vijlbrief |first1=Afiah |last2=Saharso |first2=Sawitri |last3=Ghorashi |first3=Halleh |title=Transcending the gender binary: Gender non-binary young adults in Amsterdam |journal=Journal of LGBT Youth |date=2 January 2020 |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=89–106 |doi=10.1080/19361653.2019.1660295 |doi-access=free }}</ref> States in the United States are increasingly legalizing this "third" gender on official government documents as the existence of this identity is continuously debated among individuals.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Harmon |first1=Amy |title=Which Box Do You Check? Some States Are Offering a Nonbinary Option |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/29/us/nonbinary-drivers-licenses.html |work=The New York Times |date=29 May 2019 }}</ref> There have been criticisms that representations of non-binary people in media are limited in number and diversity.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://efniks.com/the-deep-dive-pages/2018/10/17/gender-isnt-a-haircut-how-representation-of-nonbinary-people-of-color-requires-more-than-white-androgyny|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181022024157/http://efniks.com/the-deep-dive-pages/2018/10/17/gender-isnt-a-haircut-how-representation-of-nonbinary-people-of-color-requires-more-than-white-androgyny|url-status=dead|archive-date=22 October 2018|title=Gender Isn't A Haircut: How Representation of Nonbinary People of Color Requires More Than White Androgyny|website=EFNIKS.com|language=en-US|access-date=7 April 2020}}</ref>
More LGBT content was produced in the media in 2018.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/26/18028908/glaad-report-television-tv-2018-lgbtq-diversity-gay-bisexual-trans-media-representation|title=2018 saw record growth in LGBTQ roles on television|last=Liao|first=Shannon|date=2018-10-26|website=The Verge|access-date=2019-03-21}}</ref> According to GLAAD'S Annual Where We Are on TV Report, which records LGBTQ+ representation on television, the number of queer characters on TV shows rose 8.8%.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.glaad.org/whereweareontv18|title=Where We Are on TV Report - 2018|date=2018-10-23|website=GLAAD|language=en|access-date=2019-03-21}}</ref> Queer people of color also saw an increase in screen time; they outnumbered white queer people on television for the first time in the report's history.<ref name=":3" />


==See also==
==See also==
Line 70: Line 71:
* [[Compulsory heterosexuality]]
* [[Compulsory heterosexuality]]
* [[Discrimination against intersex people]]
* [[Discrimination against intersex people]]
* [[Egalitarianism]]
* [[Gender studies]]
* [[Intersex and LGBT]]
* [[List of transgender-related topics]]
* [[List of transgender-related topics]]
* [[Monique Wittig]]
* [[Monique Wittig]]
* [[Mononormativity]]
* [[Non-binary discrimination]]
* [[Non-binary discrimination]]
* [[Normality (behavior)]]
* [[Normality (behavior)]]
* [[Pink capitalism]]
* [[Sexual norm]]
* [[Straightwashing]]
* [[Straightwashing]]
* [[Structural functionalism]]
* [[Structural functionalism]]
Line 86: Line 85:


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|2}}
{{Reflist}}


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==
* Berlant, Lauren, and Michael Warner. (1998) “Sex in Public. Critical Inquiry, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 547–566. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1344178.
* Berlant, Lauren, and Michael Warner. (1998) "Sex in Public." Critical Inquiry, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 547–566. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1344178.
* {{cite journal |last1=Dreyer |first1=Yolanda |title=Hegemony and the internalisation of homophobia caused by heteronormativity |journal=HTS Teologiese Studies |date=5 May 2007 |volume=63 |issue=1 |pages=1–18 |doi=10.4102/hts.v63i1.197 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Dreyer |first1=Yolanda |title=Hegemony and the internalisation of homophobia caused by heteronormativity |journal=HTS Teologiese Studies |date=5 May 2007 |volume=63 |issue=1 |pages=1–18 |doi=10.4102/hts.v63i1.197 |doi-access=free |hdl=2263/2741 |hdl-access=free }}
* Gray, Brandon."'Brokeback Mountain' most impressive of Tepid 2005."Box Office Mojo, LLC. 25 February 2006. 7 May 2008. [http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2012&p=.htm].
* Gray, Brandon."'Brokeback Mountain' most impressive of Tepid 2005."Box Office Mojo, LLC. 25 February 2006. 7 May 2008. [http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2012&p=.htm].
* {{cite book |last1=Lovaas |first1=Karen E. |last2=Jenkins |first2=Mercilee M. |title=Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader |date=2007 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4129-1443-7 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Lovaas |first1=Karen E. |last2=Jenkins |first2=Mercilee M. |title=Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader |date=2007 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4129-1443-7 }}
Line 114: Line 113:
[[Category:Neologisms]]
[[Category:Neologisms]]
[[Category:1990s neologisms]]
[[Category:1990s neologisms]]
[[Category:Anti-LGBT sentiment]]
[[Category:LGBT erasure]]

Latest revision as of 00:27, 13 May 2024

Heteronormativity is the concept that heterosexuality is the preferred or normal sexual orientation.[1] It assumes the gender binary (i.e., that there are only two distinct, opposite genders) and that sexual and marital relations are most fitting between people of opposite sex.

Heteronormativity creates and upholds a social hierarchy based on sexual orientation with the practice and belief that heterosexuality is deemed as the societal norm.[2] A heteronormative view, therefore, involves alignment of biological sex, sexuality, gender identity and gender roles. Heteronormativity has been linked to heterosexism and homophobia,[1][3] and the effects of societal heteronormativity on lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals have been described as heterosexual or "straight" privilege.[4]

Etymology[edit]

Michael Warner popularized the term in 1991,[5] in one of the first major works of queer theory. The concept's roots are in Gayle Rubin's notion of the "sex/gender system" and Adrienne Rich's notion of compulsory heterosexuality.[6] From the outset, theories of heteronormativity included a critical look at gender; Warner wrote that "every person who comes to a queer self-understanding knows in one way or another that her stigmatization is intricated with gender. ... Being queer ... means being able, more or less articulately, to challenge the common understanding of what gender difference means."[5] Lauren Berlant and Warner further developed these ideas in their seminal essay, "Sex in Public."[7]

Relation to marriage and the nuclear family[edit]

Modern family structures in the past and present vary from what was typical of the 1950s nuclear family. In the United States, the families of the second half of the 19th century and early 20th century were characterized by the death of one or both parents for many American children.[8] In 1985, the United States is estimated to have been home to approximately 2.5 million post-divorce, stepfamily households containing children.[9] During the late 1980s, almost 20% of families with children headed by a married couple were stepfamilies.[9]

Over the past three decades, rates of divorce, single parenting, and cohabitation have risen precipitously.[10] Nontraditional families (which diverge from "a middle-class family with a bread-winning father and a stay-at-home mother, married to each other and raising their biological children") constitute the majority of families in the United States and Canada today.[10] Shared Earning/Shared Parenting Marriage (also known as Peer Marriage) where two heterosexual parents are both providers of resources and nurturers to children has become popular. Modern families may also have single-parent headed families which can be caused by divorce, separation, death, families who have two parents who are not married but have children, or families with same-sex parents. With artificial insemination, surrogate mothers, and adoption, families do not have to be formed by the heteronormative biological union of a male and a female. [11]

The consequences of these changes for the adults and children involved are heavily debated. In a 2009 Massachusetts spousal benefits case, developmental psychologist Michael Lamb testified that parental sexual orientation does not negatively affect childhood development. "Since the end of the 1980s... it has been well established that children and adolescents can adjust just as well in nontraditional settings as in traditional settings," he argued.[12] However, columnist Maggie Gallagher argues that heteronormative social structures are beneficial to society because they are optimal for the raising of children.[13] Australian-Canadian ethicist Margaret Somerville argues that "giving same-sex couples the right to found a family unlinks parenthood from biology".[14] Recent criticisms of this argument have been made by Timothy Laurie, who argues that both intersex conditions and infertility rates have always complicated links between biology, marriage, and child-rearing.[15]

A subset of heteronormativity is the concept of heteronormative temporality. This ideology states that the ultimate life goal for society is heterosexual marriage. Societal factors pressure humans to engage in the roles of the traditional nuclear family structure, which include searching for a partner of the opposite sex, engaging in a heterosexual marriage, and having children. Heteronormative temporality promotes abstinence-only until marriage. Many American parents adhere to this heteronormative narrative and teach it to their children. According to Amy T. Schalet, it seems that the bulk of parent-child sex education revolves around abstinence-only practices in the United States, but this differs in other parts of the world.[16] Similarly, George Washington University Professor, Abby Wilkerson, discusses how the healthcare and medicinal industries reinforce the views of heterosexual marriage to promote heteronormative temporality. The concept of heteronormative temporality extends beyond heterosexual marriage to include a pervasive system where heterosexuality is seen as a standard, and anything outside of that realm is not tolerated. Wilkerson explains that it dictates aspects of everyday life such as nutritional health, socio-economic status, personal beliefs, and traditional gender roles.[17]

Transgressions[edit]

Intersex people[edit]

Intersex people have biological characteristics that are ambiguously either male or female. If such a condition is detected, intersex people in most present-day societies are almost always assigned a normative sex shortly after birth.[18] Surgery (usually involving modification to the genitalia) is often performed in an attempt to produce an unambiguously male or female body, with the parents'—rather than the individual's—consent.[19] The child is then usually raised and enculturated as a cisgender heterosexual member of the assigned sex, which may or may not match their emergent gender identity throughout life or some remaining sex characteristics (for example, chromosomes, genes or internal sex organs).[20]

Transgender people[edit]

Transgender people experience a mismatch between their gender identity and their assigned sex.[21][22][23] Transgender is also an umbrella term because, it includes trans men and trans women who may be binary or non-binary, and also includes genderqueer people (whose identities are not exclusively masculine or feminine, but may, for example, be bigender, pangender, genderfluid, etc.). Some authors also believe that the trans umbrella includes transsexual people, who have transitioned through hormonal replacement therapy and sex reassignment surgery.[22][24][25]

Other definitions include third-gender people as transgender or conceptualize transgender people as a third gender,[26][27] and infrequently the term is defined very broadly to include cross-dressers.[28]

Some transgender people seek sex reassignment therapy, and may not behave according to the gender role imposed by society. Some societies consider transgender behavior a crime worthy of capital punishment, including Saudi Arabia[29] and many other nations. In some cases, gay or lesbian people were forced to undergo sex change treatments to "fix" their sex and gender in some European countries during the 20th century,[30][31] and in South Africa in the 1970s and 1980s.[32]

In some countries,[which?] including North American[33] and European countries, certain forms of violence against transgender people may be tacitly endorsed when prosecutors and juries refuse to investigate, prosecute, or convict those who perform the murders and beatings.[33][34][35] Other societies have considered transgender behavior as a psychiatric illness serious enough to justify institutionalization.[36]

In medical communities with these restrictions, patients have the option of either suppressing transsexual behavior and conforming to the norms of their birth sex (which may be necessary to avoid social stigma or even violence) or by adhering strictly to the norms of their "new" sex in order to qualify for sex reassignment surgery and hormonal treatments. Attempts to achieve an ambiguous or "alternative" gender identity would not be supported or allowed.[37] Sometimes sex reassignment surgery is a requirement for a legal sex change, and often "male" and "female" are the only choices available, even for intersex and non-binary people.[38] For governments which allow only heterosexual marriages, official gender changes can have implications for related rights and privileges, such as child custody, inheritance, and medical decision-making.[37]

Homonormativity[edit]

Homonormativity is a term which can refer to the privileging of homosexuality[39] or the assimilation of heteronormative ideals and constructs into LGBTQ culture and individual identity.[40] Specifically, Catherine Connell states that homonormativity "emphasizes commonality with the norms of heterosexual culture, including marriage, monogamy, procreation, and productivity".[41][42] The term is almost always used in its latter sense, and was used prominently by Lisa Duggan in 2003,[43] although transgender studies scholar Susan Stryker, in her article "Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinary",[44] noted that it was also used by transgender activists in the 1990s in reference to the imposition of gay/lesbian norms over the concerns of transgender people.[44][45] Transgender people were not included in healthcare programs combating the AIDS epidemic, and were often excluded from gay/lesbian demonstrations in Washington, D.C.[46] Homonormativity has also grown to include transnormativity, or "the pressure put on trans people to conform to traditional, oppositional sexist understandings of gender".[47] In addition, homonormativity can be used today to cover or erase the radical politics of the queer community during the Gay Liberation Movement,[41][48] by not only replacing these politics with more conservative goals like marriage equality and adoption rights, but also commercializing and mainstreaming queer subcultures.[47][49]

According to Penny Griffin, Politics and International Relations lecturer at the University of New South Wales, homonormativity upholds neoliberalism rather than critiquing the enforcement of its values of monogamy, procreation, and binary gender roles as inherently heterosexist and racist.[50] In this sense, homonormativity is deeply intertwined with the expansion and maintenance of the internationally structured and structuring capitalistic worldwide system.[51] Duggan asserts that homonormativity fragments LGBT communities into hierarchies of worthiness, and that LGBT people that come the closest to mimicking heteronormative standards of gender identity are deemed most worthy of receiving rights. She also states that LGBT individuals at the bottom of this hierarchy (e.g. bisexual people, trans people, non-binary people, people of non-Western genders, intersex people, queers of color, queer sex workers) are seen as an impediment to this class of homonormative individuals receiving their rights.[43][41][52] For example, one empirical study found that in the Netherlands, transgender people and other gender non-conforming LGBT people are often looked down upon within their communities for not acting "normal". Those who do assimilate often become invisible in society and experience constant fear and shame about the non-conformers within their communities.[53] Stryker referenced theorist Jürgen Habermas and his view of the public sphere allowing for individuals to come together, as a group, to discuss diverse ideologies and by excluding the non-conforming LGBTQ community, society as a whole were undoubtedly excluding the gender-variant individuals from civic participation.[44]

Criticism[edit]

Critics of heteronormative attitudes, such as Cathy J. Cohen, Michael Warner, and Lauren Berlant,[7] argue that such attitudes are oppressive, stigmatizing, marginalizing of perceived deviant forms of sexuality and gender, and make self-expression more challenging when that expression does not conform to the norm.[54][55] Heteronormativity describes how social institutions and policies reinforce the presumption that people are heterosexual and that gender and sex are natural binaries.[56] Heteronormative culture privileges heterosexuality as normal and natural and fosters a climate where LGBT individuals are discriminated against in marriage, tax codes, and employment.[57][55] Following Berlant and Warner, Laurie and Stark also argue that the domestic "intimate sphere" becomes "the unquestioned non‐place that anchors heteronormative public discourses, especially those concerning marriage and adoption rights".[58]

According to cultural anthropologist Gayle Rubin, heteronormativity in mainstream society creates a "sex hierarchy" that graduates sexual practices from morally "good sex" to "bad sex". The hierarchy considers reproductive, monogamous sex between committed heterosexuals as "good," whereas any sexual act or individual who falls short of this standard is labeled as "bad." Specifically, this standard categorizes long-term committed gay couples and non-monogamous/sexually active gay individuals between the two poles.[59] Patrick McCreery, lecturer at New York University, argues that this hierarchy explains how gay people are stigmatized for socially "deviant" sexual practices that are often practiced by straight people as well, such as consumption of pornography or sex in public places.[55] There are many studies of sexual orientation discrimination on college campuses.[60]

McCreery states that this heteronormative hierarchy carries over to the workplace, where gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals face discrimination such as anti-homosexual hiring policies or workplace discrimination that often leaves "lowest hierarchy" individuals such as transsexual people vulnerable to the most overt discrimination and unable to find work.[55]

Applicants and current employees can be legally passed over or fired for being non-heterosexual or perceived as non-heterosexual in many countries. An example of this practice is found in the case of the chain restaurant Cracker Barrel, which garnered national attention in 1991 after they fired an employee for being openly lesbian, citing their policy that employees with "sexual preferences that fail to demonstrate normal heterosexual values were inconsistent with traditional American values." Workers such as the fired employee and effeminate male waiters (allegedly described as the true targets),[55] were legally fired by work policies "transgressing" against "normal" heteronormative culture.[55]

Mustafa Bilgehan Ozturk analyzes the interconnectivity of heteronormativity and sexual employment discrimination by tracing the impact of patriarchal practices and institutions on the workplace experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual employees in a variety of contexts in Turkey. This further demonstrates the specific historicity and localized power/knowledge formations that give rise to physical, professional, and psycho-emotive acts of prejudice against sexual minorities.[61]

Certain religions have been known to promote heteronormative beliefs through their teachings.[62] According to Sociology professors Samuel Perry and Kara Snawder from The University of Oklahoma, multiple research studies in the past have shown that there can be and often is a link between the religious beliefs of Americans and homophobic behavior.[63] Out of the world's five major religions, the Abrahamic religions—Christianity, Judaism, and Islam—all uphold heteronormative views on marriage.[62] Some examples of this playing out in recent years include the incident involving Kentucky clerk Kim Davis, who refused to give marriage licenses to same-sex couples on the grounds that it violated her spiritual views,[64] as well as the Supreme Court ruling that a Colorado baker did not have to provide a wedding cake for a gay couple based on his religion.[65]

Media representation[edit]

Five different studies have shown that gay characters appearing on TV decreases the prejudice among viewers.[66] Cable and streaming services are beginning to include more characters who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender than broadcast television.[67] Cable and streaming services are lacking in diversity, according to a GLAAD report, with many of the LGBT characters being gay men (41% and 39% respectively).[67] The total number of LGBT characters counted on cable was reported to be 31% up from 2015, and bisexual representations saw an almost twofold increase.[67]

Intersex people are excluded almost completely from television, though about 1% of the population is intersex.[68] News medias outline what it means to be male or female, which causes a gap for anyone who doesn't fall into those two categories.[68] Newspapers have covered the topic of intersex athletes with the case of Caster Semenya, where news spread of sporting officials having to determine whether she was to be considered female or male.[69]

Those who do not identify as either woman or man are gender non-binary, or gender non-conforming.[70] States in the United States are increasingly legalizing this "third" gender on official government documents as the existence of this identity is continuously debated among individuals.[71] There have been criticisms that representations of non-binary people in media are limited in number and diversity.[72]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Harris J, White V (2018). A Dictionary of Social Work and Social Care. Oxford University Press. p. 335. ISBN 978-0-19-251686-2. Retrieved 19 August 2018.
  2. ^ Ray, T. N., & Parkhill, M. R. (2021). Heteronormativity, Disgust Sensitivity, and Hostile Attitudes toward Gay Men: Potential Mechanisms to Maintain Social Hierarchies. Sex Roles, 84(1/2), 49–60. doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01146-w
  3. ^ Goodman RD, Gorski PC (2014). Decolonizing "Multicultural" Counseling through Social Justice. Springer. pp. 28–30. ISBN 978-1-4939-1283-4. Retrieved 19 August 2018.
  4. ^ Williford, Beth (2009). "Heterosexual privilege". Encyclopedia of Gender and Society: 418–420. doi:10.4135/9781412964517. ISBN 9781412909167.
  5. ^ a b Warner, Michael (1991). "Introduction: Fear of a Queer Planet". Social Text (29): 3–17. JSTOR 466295.
  6. ^ Rich, Adrienne (July 1980). "Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence". Signs. 5 (4): 631–660. doi:10.1086/493756. S2CID 143604951.
  7. ^ a b Berlant, Lauren; Warner, Michael (1 January 1998). "Sex in Public". Critical Inquiry. 24 (2): 547–566. doi:10.1086/448884. ISSN 0093-1896. S2CID 161701244.
  8. ^ Coontz, Stephanie (1992). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic books. ISBN 0465001351.[page needed]
  9. ^ a b Coleman, Marilyn; Ganong, Lawrence H.; Goodwin, Chanel (July 1994). "The Presentation of Stepfamilies in Marriage and Family Textbooks: A Reexamination". Family Relations. 43 (3): 289. doi:10.2307/585420. JSTOR 585420.
  10. ^ a b Benfer, Amy. The Nuclear Family Takes a Hit Archived 22 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Salon.com. 7 June 2001
  11. ^ Bala, Nicholas; Ashbourne, Christine (2012). "The Widening Concept of Parent in Canada: Step- Parents, Same-Sex Partners, & Parents by ART". American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law. 30 (3). Retrieved 4 July 2021.
  12. ^ Michael Lamb, Ph.D.: Affidavit – United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (2009)
  13. ^ Maggie Gallagher (4 September 2003). "Why Marriage Matters: The Case for Normal Marriage. Testimony before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights Hearing: "What is needed to defend the Bipartisan Defense of Marriage Act of 1996?"" (PDF). Institute for Marriage and Public Policy. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
  14. ^ Margaret Somerville – In Conversation Archived 5 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  15. ^ Laurie, Timothy (3 June 2015). "Bigotry or biology: the hard choice for an opponent of marriage equality". ABC News.
  16. ^ Schalet, Amy T. Not under My Roof: Parents, Teens, and the Culture of Sex. Chicago: U of Chicago, 2011. ISBN 978-0-226-73618-1
  17. ^ Wilkerson, Abby (June 2013). "I Want to Hold Your Hand: Abstinence Curricula, Bioethics, and the Silencing of Desire". Journal of Medical Humanities. 34 (2): 101–108. doi:10.1007/s10912-013-9213-0. PMID 23468394. S2CID 35152974.
  18. ^ Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.[page needed]
  19. ^ Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
  20. ^ Wilchins, Riki. 2002. 'A certain kind of freedom: power and the truth of bodies – four essays on gender.' In GenderQueer: Voices from beyond the sexual binary. Los Angeles: Alyson Books 23–66.
  21. ^ Stroud District Council "Gender Equality SCHEME AND ACTION PLAN 2007" Archived 27 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine, defines the state of being transgender as "Non-identification with, or non-presentation as, the sex (and assumed gender) one was assigned at birth."
  22. ^ a b Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. "GLAAD Media Reference Guide – Transgender glossary of terms", "GLAAD", USA, May 2010. Retrieved on 24 February 2011. "An umbrella term for people whose gender identity and/or gender expression differs from what is typically associated with the sex they were assigned at birth."
  23. ^ "USI LGBT Campaign – Transgender Campaign" (retrieved 11 January 2012) defines transgender people as "People who were assigned a sex, usually at birth and based on their genitals, but who feel that this is a false or incomplete description of themselves."
  24. ^ Bilodeau, Brent (29 December 2005). "Beyond the Gender Binary: A Case Study of Two Transgender Students at a Midwestern Research University". Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education. 3 (1): 29–44. doi:10.1300/J367v03n01_05. S2CID 144070536.
  25. ^ Layton, Lynne (1998). "In Defense of Gender Ambiguity: Jessica Benjamin. Gender & Psychoanalysis. I, 1996. Pp. 27-43". Psychoanalytic Quarterly. 67 (2): 341.
  26. ^ Susan Stryker, Stephen Whittle, The Transgender Studies Reader (ISBN 1-135-39884-4), page 666: "The authors note that, increasingly, in social science literature, the term "third gender" is being replaced by or conflated with the newer term "transgender."
  27. ^ Joan C. Chrisler, Donald R. McCreary, Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology, volume 1 (2010, ISBN 1-4419-1465-X), page 486: "Transgender is a broad term characterized by a challenge of traditional gender roles and gender identity[. …] For example, some cultures classify transgender individuals as a third gender, thereby treating this phenomenon as normative."
  28. ^ Reisner, Sari L.; Conron, Kerith; Scout, Nfn; Mimiaga, Matthew J.; Haneuse, Sebastien; Austin, S. Bryn (June 2014). "Comparing In-Person and Online Survey Respondents in the U.S. National Transgender Discrimination Survey: Implications for Transgender Health Research". LGBT Health. 1 (2): 98–106. doi:10.1089/lgbt.2013.0018. PMID 26789619.
  29. ^ Saudis Arrest 5 Pakistani TGs
  30. ^ The Unkindest Cut | The science and ethics of castration
  31. ^ Turing, Alan (1912–1954) Archived 1 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  32. ^ McGreal, Chris (29 July 2000). "Gays tell of mutilation by apartheid army". The Guardian.
  33. ^ a b Frye, Phyllis (1 October 2000). "The International Bill of Gender Rights vs. The Cider House Rules: Transgenders Struggle with the Courts Over What Clothing They Are Allowed to Wear on the Job, Which Restroom They are Allowed to Use on the Job, Their Right to Marry, and the Very Definition of Their Sex". William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice. 7 (1): 133.
  34. ^ "OUTfront! Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgendered Human Rights:"Battybwoys affi dead" Action against homophobia in Jamaica". AmnestyUSA.org. 7 May 2004. Archived from the original on 2 June 2010. Retrieved 4 June 2010.
  35. ^ "SPLCenter.org: 'Disposable People'". Archived from the original on 11 July 2014. Retrieved 10 June 2004.
  36. ^ "The Medicalization of Transgenderism - Trans Health". Trans Health. 18 July 2001. Retrieved 5 February 2017.
  37. ^ a b Weiss, Jillian Todd (2001). "The Gender Caste System: Identity, Privacy and Heteronormativity" (PDF). Law & Sexuality. 10. Tulane Law School: 123–186. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 June 2007. Retrieved 25 February 2007.
  38. ^ Tranter, Chi (18 March 2010). "Norrie's 'ungendered' status withdrawn". The Sydney Morning Herald.
  39. ^ David Orzechowitz (2010). "Gender, Sexuality, Culture and the Closet in Theme Park Parades". In Christine L. Williams; Kirsten Dellinger (eds.). Gender and Sexuality in the Workplace. Emerald Group. p. 241. ISBN 978-1-8485-5371-2. The dominance of a homonormative culture in Parades subordinates male heterosexuality to male homosexuality.
  40. ^ "Homonormativity". web.uvic.ca. Positive Space Network. Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  41. ^ a b c Connell, Catherine. School's Out : Gay and Lesbian Teachers in the Classroom (1). Berkeley, US: University of California Press, 2014. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 15 March 2017.
  42. ^ Queer Twin Cities. Minneapolis, US: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 15 March 2017.
  43. ^ a b Duggan, Lisa. The Twilight of Equality?: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack On Democracy. Beacon Press, 2003.
  44. ^ a b c Stryker, Susan (1 January 2008). "Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity". Radical History Review. 2008 (100): 145–157. doi:10.1215/01636545-2007-026.
  45. ^ Cover, Rob (2016). Queer Youth Suicide, Culture and Identity: Unliveable Lives?. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-07255-3.[page needed]
  46. ^ Stryker, Susan (2008). Transgender History. Seal Press. ISBN 978-1-58005-224-5.[page needed]
  47. ^ a b Lewis, Holly (2016). The Politics of Everybody. London: Zed Books Ltd. pp. 222–230. ISBN 978-1-78360-287-2.
  48. ^ Duggan, Lisa (2002). "The New Homonormativity: The Sexual Politics of Neoliberalism". In Castronovo, Russ; Nelson, Dana D. (eds.). Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics. Duke University Press. pp. 175–194. ISBN 978-0-8223-8390-1.
  49. ^ Alderson, David (2016). Sex, Needs and Queer Culture. London: Zed Books Ltd. ISBN 978-1-78360-512-5.[page needed]
  50. ^ Griffin, Penny (May 2007). "Sexing the Economy in a Neo-Liberal World Order: Neo-Liberal Discourse and the (Re)Production of Heteronormative Heterosexuality". The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 9 (2): 220–238. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00280.x. S2CID 144295490.
  51. ^ Stryker, S. (1 January 2008). "Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity". Radical History Review. 2008 (100): 145–157. doi:10.1215/01636545-2007-026.
  52. ^ Ferguson, Roderick A. (2005). "Race-ing Homonormativity: Citizenship, Sociology, and Gay Identity". In E. Patrick Johnson; Mae G. Henderson (eds.). Black Queer Studies: A Critical Anthology. Duke University Press. pp. 52–67. doi:10.1215/9780822387220. ISBN 978-0-8223-8722-0.
  53. ^ Robinson, Brandon Andrew (December 2012). "Is This What Equality Looks Like?: How Assimilation Marginalizes the Dutch LGBT Community". Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 9 (4): 327–336. doi:10.1007/s13178-012-0084-3. S2CID 146137993.
  54. ^ Leap, William (2007). "Language, Socialization and Silence in Gay Adolescence". Section (from p. 98): "Charting a Path through the 'Desert of Nothing'". In Lovaas, Karen E.; Jenkins, Mercilee M. (eds.). Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader. California, USA: SAGE. pp. 95–107. ISBN 978-1-4129-1443-7.
  55. ^ a b c d e f Krupat, Kitty (2001). Out at Work: Building a Gay-Labor Alliance. U of Minnesota Press. p. 268. ISBN 978-0-8166-3741-6.
  56. ^ DeFrancisco, Victoria (2014). Gender in Communication. U.S.A: SAGE Publication, Inc. p. 16. ISBN 978-1-4522-2009-3.
  57. ^ Meyer, Doug (2015). Violence against Queer People. Rutgers University Press.
  58. ^ Laurie, Timothy; Stark, Hannah (28 April 2011). "Reconsidering Kinship: Beyond the Nuclear Family with Deleuze and Guattari". Cultural Studies Review. 18 (1). doi:10.5130/csr.v18i1.1612. hdl:10453/44229.
  59. ^ Rubin, Gayle (1993). "Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality". In Vance, Carole (ed.). Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality.
  60. ^ Byron, Reginald A.; Lowe, Maria R.; Billingsley, Brianna; Tuttle, Nathan (16 April 2017). "Performativity Double Standards and the Sexual Orientation Climate at a Southern Liberal Arts University". Journal of Homosexuality. 64 (5): 671–696. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1196994. PMID 27267937. S2CID 20963768.
  61. ^ Bilgehan Ozturk, Mustafa (August 2011). "Sexual orientation discrimination: Exploring the experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual employees in Turkey". Human Relations. 64 (8): 1099–1118. doi:10.1177/0018726710396249. S2CID 59439253.
  62. ^ a b "Homosexuality and Religion | SexInfo Online". www.soc.ucsb.edu. Archived from the original on 14 June 2019. Retrieved 21 March 2019.
  63. ^ Perry, Samuel L.; Snawder, Kara J. (December 2016). "Longitudinal Effects of Religious Media on Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage". Sexuality & Culture. 20 (4): 785–804. doi:10.1007/s12119-016-9357-y. S2CID 148173061.
  64. ^ Blinder, Alan; Lewin, Tamar (3 September 2015). "Clerk in Kentucky Chooses Jail Over Deal on Same-Sex Marriage". The New York Times.
  65. ^ "Masterpiece Cake Shop, LTD v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission" (PDF). supremecourt.gov. Supreme Court of the United States. 21 March 2019.
  66. ^ Stelter, Brian (9 May 2012). "Gay on TV: It's All in the Family". The New York Times.
  67. ^ a b c Egner, Jeremy (27 October 2015). "More Gay and Transgender Characters Are on TV, Report Shows". The New York Times.
  68. ^ a b Kerry, Stephen (September 2011). "Representation of intersex in news media: the case of Kathleen Worrall". Journal of Gender Studies. 20 (3): 263–277. doi:10.1080/09589236.2011.593325. S2CID 144222294.
  69. ^ Busari, Stephanie. "Gender row athlete: What is intersexuality?". edition.cnn.com. Retrieved 12 December 2016.
  70. ^ Vijlbrief, Afiah; Saharso, Sawitri; Ghorashi, Halleh (2 January 2020). "Transcending the gender binary: Gender non-binary young adults in Amsterdam". Journal of LGBT Youth. 17 (1): 89–106. doi:10.1080/19361653.2019.1660295.
  71. ^ Harmon, Amy (29 May 2019). "Which Box Do You Check? Some States Are Offering a Nonbinary Option". The New York Times.
  72. ^ "Gender Isn't A Haircut: How Representation of Nonbinary People of Color Requires More Than White Androgyny". EFNIKS.com. Archived from the original on 22 October 2018. Retrieved 7 April 2020.

Bibliography[edit]

  • Berlant, Lauren, and Michael Warner. (1998) "Sex in Public." Critical Inquiry, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 547–566. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1344178.
  • Dreyer, Yolanda (5 May 2007). "Hegemony and the internalisation of homophobia caused by heteronormativity". HTS Teologiese Studies. 63 (1): 1–18. doi:10.4102/hts.v63i1.197. hdl:2263/2741.
  • Gray, Brandon."'Brokeback Mountain' most impressive of Tepid 2005."Box Office Mojo, LLC. 25 February 2006. 7 May 2008. [1].
  • Lovaas, Karen E.; Jenkins, Mercilee M. (2007). Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader. SAGE. ISBN 978-1-4129-1443-7.
  • Peele, Thomas. Composition Studies, Heteronormativity, and Popular Culture. 2001 Boise State University. 5 May 2008. [2].
  • The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. "U.S. Religious Landscape Survey." 7 May 2008. 7 May 2008. [3].

Further reading[edit]