Jump to content

GAM-87 Skybolt: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
added disambig links
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
|origin=
|origin=
|type=[[Air-launched ballistic missile]]
|type=[[Air-launched ballistic missile]]
[[Air-to-surface missile]]
|used_by=
|used_by=
|manufacturer=[[Douglas Aircraft]], [[Northrop Corporation|Northrop]]
|manufacturer=[[Douglas Aircraft]], [[Northrop Corporation|Northrop]]
Line 21: Line 22:
|diameter={{convert|35|in}}
|diameter={{convert|35|in}}
|wingspan={{convert|5|ft|6|in}}
|wingspan={{convert|5|ft|6|in}}
|speed={{convert|9500|mph}}
|speed={{convert|9500|mph|km/h Mach}}
|vehicle_range={{convert|1150|mi}}
|vehicle_range={{convert|1150|mi}}
|ceiling=>{{convert|300|mi}}
|ceiling={{convert|300|mi}}
|altitude=
|altitude=
|filling=[[W59]] [[thermonuclear weapon]] (1 [[TNT equivalent|megaton]])
|filling=[[W59]] [[thermonuclear weapon]] (1 [[TNT equivalent|megaton]])
Line 29: Line 30:
|detonation=
|detonation=
|launch_platform=Aircraft
|launch_platform=Aircraft
}}{{About|the ballistic missile|the biplane|Steen Skybolt|the sounding rocket|Starchaser Industries|the French-Canadian film|La Guêpe (film)}}
}}
The [[Douglas Aircraft Company|Douglas]] '''GAM-87 Skybolt''' ('''AGM-48''' under the [[1962 United States Tri-Service aircraft designation system|1962 Tri-service system]]) was a hypersonic [[air-launched ballistic missile]] (ALBM) developed by the United States during the late 1950s. The basic concept was to allow US [[strategic bomber]]s to launch their weapons from well outside the range of Soviet defenses, as much as {{convert|1000|miles}} from their targets. To do this in an air-launched form, a lightweight [[thermonuclear warhead]] was needed. Initially, the [[W47]] from the [[Polaris missile]] was selected, but it was later replaced by the [[W59]] from the [[Minuteman missile]].


The UK joined the Skybolt program in 1960, intending to use it on their [[V bomber]] force. When the design added a [[star tracker]] in addition to its [[inertial navigation system]] (INS) this meant that it could only be carried externally where the tracker could see the sky. This requirement along with the required ground clearance on takeoff limited it to the [[Avro Vulcan]] bomber. Several design decisions in the W47 led the RAF to question its safety, so they intended to use their own [[Red Snow]] warheads. This was a heavier warhead and would reduce the range to about {{convert|600|miles}}, meaning the bombers would have to cross the Soviet coastline to attack [[Moscow]].
The [[Douglas Aircraft Company|Douglas]] '''GAM-87 Skybolt''' ('''AGM-48''' under the [[1962 United States Tri-Service aircraft designation system|1962 Tri-service system]]) was an [[air-launched ballistic missile]] (ALBM) developed by the United States during the late 1950s. The basic concept was to allow US [[strategic bomber]]s to launch their weapons from well outside the range of Soviet defenses, as much as {{convert|1000|miles}} from their targets. To do this in an air-launched form, a lightweight [[thermonuclear warhead]] was needed. Initially, the [[W47]] from the [[Polaris missile]] was selected, but it was later replaced by the [[W59]] from the [[Minuteman missile]].


Testing began in 1962 and was initially marked by a string of failures. These failures, along with a lack of mission after the successful development of [[submarine-launched ballistic missile]]s (SLBMs), led to its cancellation in December 1962.<ref name="af.mil">http://www.af.mil/search/generalsearch.asp?q=skybolt&site=AFLINK{{dead link|date=October 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> The UK had decided to base its entire 1960s deterrent force on Skybolt, and its cancellation led to a major disagreement between the UK and US, known today as the "[[Nassau Agreement#Skybolt Crisis|Skybolt Crisis]]". This was resolved by a [[Nassau agreement|series of meetings]] that led to the [[Royal Navy]] gaining the [[UGM-27 Polaris]] missile and construction of the {{sclass|Resolution|submarine|1}}s to launch them.
The UK joined the Skybolt program in 1960, intending to use it on their [[V bomber]] force. When the design added a [[star tracker]] in addition to its [[inertial navigation system]] (INS) this meant that it could only be carried externally where the tracker could see the sky. This requirement along with the required ground clearance on takeoff limited it to the [[Avro Vulcan]] bomber. A number of design decisions in the W47 led the RAF to question its safety, so they intended to use their own [[Red Snow]] warheads. This was a heavier warhead and would reduce the range to about {{convert|600|miles}}, meaning the bombers would have to cross the Soviet coastline to attack [[Moscow]].

Testing began in 1962 and was initially marked by a string of failures. These failures, along with a lack of mission after the successful development of [[submarine-launched ballistic missile]]s (SLBMs), led to its cancellation in December 1962.<ref name="af.mil">http://www.af.mil/search/generalsearch.asp?q=skybolt&site=AFLINK{{dead link|date=October 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> The UK had decided to base its entire 1960s deterrent force on Skybolt, and its cancellation led to a major disagreement between the UK and US, known today as the "[[Nassau Agreement#Skybolt Crisis|Skybolt Crisis]]". This was resolved by a [[Nassau agreement|series of meetings]] that led to the [[Royal Navy]] gaining the [[UGM-27 Polaris]] missile and construction of the {{sclass-|Resolution|submarine|1}}s to launch them.


==History==
==History==
===Background===
===Background===
The [[US Air Force]] had built up an enormous fleet of [[strategic bomber]]s during the 1950s, only to see them threatened by the possibility of a surprise attack by Soviet [[ICBM]]s. As the US bombers were located at only a small number of air bases, a relatively small fleet of missiles could attack all of them at once. The US had been developing its own ICBMs but early models like the [[SM-65 Atlas]] required some time to prepare to launch from their surface launchers and were vulnerable to sneak air attack. A carefully timed attack from bombers against US missiles and ICBMs against US bombers could inflict serious damage.<ref name=wizards>{{cite book |first=Fred |last=Kaplan |title= The Wizards of Armageddon |publisher= Stanford University Press |date = 1991 |pages=237–238}}</ref>
The [[US Air Force]] had built up an enormous fleet of [[strategic bomber]]s during the 1950s, only to see them threatened by the possibility of a surprise attack by Soviet [[ICBM]]s. As the US bombers were located at only a small number of air bases, a relatively small fleet of missiles could attack all of them at once. The US had been developing its own ICBMs as well, but early models, like the [[SM-65 Atlas]], required some time to prepare to launch from their surface launchers and were vulnerable to sneak air attack. A carefully timed attack from Soviet bombers against US missiles and their ICBMs against US bomber fields could inflict serious damage.<ref name=wizards>{{cite book |first=Fred |last=Kaplan |title= The Wizards of Armageddon |publisher= Stanford University Press |date = 1991 |pages=237–238}}</ref>


The one weapon system that was not open to attack was the [[US Navy]]'s [[Polaris missile]] system. The Polaris submarines could cruise in large areas of the Atlantic or Pacific where the Soviet fleet was unable to find them, and launch their missiles with impunity. If the goal of the nuclear force was to maintain deterrence by ensuring that a counterstrike would be launched, Polaris met this goal in a way the existing Air Force fleet could not. This fact was more worrying to the Air Force than the Soviet arsenal and generated a number of internal reports on how to deal with this threat to their dominance in the strategic field.<ref name=wizards/>
The one weapon system that was not open to attack was the [[US Navy]]'s [[Polaris missile]] system. The Polaris equipped submarines could cruise in large areas of the Atlantic or Pacific where the Soviet fleet was unable to find them, and launch their missiles with impunity. If the goal of the nuclear force was to maintain deterrence by ensuring that a counterstrike would be launched, Polaris met this goal in a way the existing Air Force fleet could not. This fact was more worrying to the Air Force than the Soviet arsenal and generated a number of internal reports on how to deal with this threat to their dominance in the strategic field.<ref name=wizards/>


===WS-199 and WS-138===
===WS-199 and WS-138===
In response, in 1957 the Air Force began studying solutions to the "Puzzle of Polaris" under the [[WS-199]] program. WS-199 was a grab-bag effort, studying anything that might improve the survivability of the Air Force strike capability. Primary among the concepts were two air-launched ballistic missiles, [[Bold Orion]] and [[High Virgo]]. These systems would give the Air Force a system somewhat similar to the Navy's; in times of high alert, the bomber force would be sent to holding positions far outside the range of any Soviet defenses, and then launch their missiles on command. Using [[aerial refueling]], a bomber might be expected to be able to [[loiter (flight)|loiter]] for as long as a day.
In response, in 1957 the Air Force began studying solutions to the "Puzzle of Polaris" under the [[WS-199]] program. WS-199 was a grab-bag effort, studying anything that might improve the survivability of the Air Force strike capability. Primary among the concepts were two air-launched ballistic missiles, [[Bold Orion]] and [[High Virgo]]. These systems would give the Air Force a method somewhat similar to the Navy's; in times of high alert, the bomber force would be sent to holding positions far outside the range of any Soviet defenses, and then launch their missiles on command. Using [[aerial refueling]], a bomber might be expected to be able to [[loiter (flight)|loiter]] for as long as a day.


But this system had a major advantage compared to Polaris, as the missiles could be retargeted before launch. In theory, the bombers could be used as a second-strike weapon, attacking only those targets that had been missed in a first-strike, or alternately, being switched from counterforce to countervalue targets or vice versa. Ground-based systems like Atlas and Polaris lacked this ability, and could only be retargeted with a significant amount of effort. Even the latest Air Force design, the [[LGM-30 Minuteman]], required changes in targeting data to be loaded from [[magnetic tape]] in a process that took several weeks.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The Six-Hundred Million Dollar Mouse |journal= Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |date=November 1996 |page=68 |first=William |last=Arkin}}</ref>
This system had a major advantage compared to Polaris, as the aircraft could be sent radio instructions to retarget the missiles before launch. In theory, the bombers could be used as a second-strike weapon, attacking only those targets that had been missed in a first-strike, or alternately, being switched from counterforce to countervalue targets or vice versa. Ground-based systems like Atlas and Polaris lacked this ability, and could only be retargeted with a significant amount of effort. Even the latest Air Force design, the [[LGM-30 Minuteman]], required changes in targeting data to be loaded from magnetic tape in a process that took several weeks.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The Six-Hundred Million Dollar Mouse |journal= Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |date=November 1996 |page=68 |first=William |last=Arkin|volume= 52 |issue= 6 |doi= 10.1080/00963402.1996.11456682 |bibcode= 1996BuAtS..52f..68A }}</ref>


WS-199 was generally successful, but the two ALBMs had shorter range than desired. The Air Force tendered bids for a longer-range version in early 1959. [[Douglas Aircraft]] received the prime contract in May, and in turn subcontracted to [[Northrop Corporation|Northrop]] for the guidance system, [[Aerojet]] for the propulsion system, and [[General Electric]] for the reentry vehicle. The system was initially known as WS-138A and was given the official name GAM-87 Skybolt in 1960.
WS-199 was generally successful, but the two ALBMs had a shorter range than desired. The Air Force tendered bids for a longer-range version in early 1959. [[Douglas Aircraft]] received the prime contract in May, and in turn subcontracted to [[Northrop Corporation|Northrop]] for the guidance system, [[Aerojet]] for the propulsion system, and [[General Electric]] for the reentry vehicle. The system was initially known as WS-138A and was given the official name GAM-87 Skybolt in 1960.


===British involvement===
===British involvement===
[[File:RAF Museum Cosford - DSC08475.JPG|thumb|right|Skybolt at [[RAF Museum Cosford]] Showing the RAF roundel and the manufacturer ([[Douglas Aircraft]]) logo. It carries the tail-cone fairing that reduces drag in flight.]]
[[File:RAF Museum Cosford - DSC08475.JPG|thumb|right|Skybolt at [[RAF Museum Cosford]] Showing the RAF roundel and the manufacturer ([[Douglas Aircraft]]) logo. It carries the tail-cone fairing that reduces drag in flight.]]


At the same time, the [[Royal Air Force]] (RAF) was having problems with their [[Medium-range ballistic missile|MRBM]] missile project, the [[Blue Streak missile|Blue Streak]], which was long overdue. Even if this was successful it faced the serious problem of basing. No fixed land-based missile system could be credibly installed in the British Isles; they were well within the range of Soviet air strikes. The limited land mass available meant it would be relatively easy for missile sites to be spotted no matter what security measures were taken. Suitable locations for construction also carried a social and political cost. Fixed land-based ballistic missile sites need many thousands of acres per squadron (typically ten missiles); and the squadrons need to be apportioned over many thousands of square miles so that no single attack could conceivably destroy them all in one strike.
At the same time, the [[Royal Air Force]] (RAF) was having problems with their [[Medium-range ballistic missile|MRBM]] missile project, the [[Blue Streak missile|Blue Streak]], which was long overdue. Even if this was successful it faced the serious problem of basing. No fixed land-based missile system could be credibly installed in the British Isles; they were well within the range of Soviet air strikes. The limited land mass available meant it would be relatively easy for missile sites to be spotted no matter what security measures were taken, and flying time for a jet bomber from the coast to any potential inland location would be on the order of minutes.


This left the deterrent based on their own bomber force, the [[V bomber]] fleet, which the RAF had already long concluded would be unable to penetrate Soviet defenses by about 1960. The RAF was in the process of introducing their own stand-off missile, the {{convert|950|km}} ranged Mach 3 [[Blue Steel (missile)|Blue Steel]]. While capable, the missile flew at altitudes and speeds that left it vulnerable to improving SAMs, and it had a number of reliability and serviceability issues that made it less than ideal. A faster, longer-ranged version was being designed, Blue Steel II, but it would be some time before it could enter service.
This left the deterrent based on their own bomber force, the [[V bomber]] fleet, which the RAF had already long concluded would be unable to penetrate Soviet defenses by about 1960. The RAF was in the process of introducing their own stand-off missile, the {{convert|950|km}} ranged Mach 3 [[Blue Steel (missile)|Blue Steel]]. While capable, the missile flew at altitudes and speeds that left it vulnerable to improving SAMs, and it had a number of reliability and serviceability issues that made it less than ideal. A faster, longer-ranged version was being talked about, Blue Steel II, but it would be some time before it could enter service.


The long-range Skybolt would eliminate the need for both the Blue Streak and the Blue Steel II. Blue Steel II was canceled in December 1959 and the British Cabinet decided in February 1960 to cancel Blue Streak as well. Prime Minister [[Harold Macmillan|Macmillan]] met President [[Dwight David Eisenhower|Eisenhower]] in March 1960 and agreed to purchase 144 Skybolts for the RAF. By agreement, British funding for research and development was limited to that required to modify the V bombers to take the missile, but the British were allowed to fit their own warheads and the Americans were given nuclear submarine basing facilities in Scotland.<ref name="Brooks114" /> Following the agreement, the Blue Streak program was formally canceled in April 1960 and in May 1960 an agreement for an initial order of 100 Skybolts was concluded.<ref name="Brooks114" />
The long-range Skybolt would eliminate the need for both the Blue Streak and the Blue Steel II. Blue Steel II was canceled in December 1959 and the British Cabinet decided in February 1960 to cancel Blue Streak as well. Prime Minister [[Harold Macmillan|Macmillan]] met President [[Dwight David Eisenhower|Eisenhower]] in March 1960 and agreed to purchase 144 Skybolts for the RAF. By agreement, British funding for research and development was limited to that required to modify the V bombers to take the missile, but the British were allowed to fit their own warheads. In exchange, the Americans were given nuclear submarine basing facilities in Scotland.<ref name="Brooks114" /> Following the agreement, the Blue Streak program was formally canceled in April 1960 and in May 1960 an agreement for an initial order of 100 Skybolts was concluded.<ref name="Brooks114" />


[[Avro]] was made an associate contractor to manage the Skybolt program for the United Kingdom and four different schemes were submitted to find a platform for the missile.<ref name="Brooks114" /> A number of different aircraft were considered, including a variant of the [[Vickers VC10]] airliner and two of the current V bombers, the [[Avro Vulcan]] and [[Handley Page Victor]].<ref name="Brooks114" /> It was decided to use the Vulcan to initially carry two missiles each on hardpoints outboard of the main landing gear.<ref name="Brooks114" />
[[Avro]] was made an associate contractor to manage the Skybolt program for the United Kingdom and four different schemes were submitted to find a platform for the missile.<ref name="Brooks114" /> A number of different aircraft were considered, including a variant of the [[Vickers VC10]] airliner and two of the current V bombers, the [[Avro Vulcan]] and [[Handley Page Victor]].<ref name="Brooks114" /> It was decided to use the Vulcan to initially carry two missiles each on hardpoints outboard of the main landing gear.<ref name="Brooks114" />


===Development and testing===
===Development and testing===
[[File:Avro Vulcan and B-52 over Edwards Air Force Base.jpg|thumb|right|Avro Vulcan and B-52 over Edwards Air Force Base]]
During development, it was decided that the system could not reach the required accuracy at the desired range without improvements to the guidance system. This led to the introduction of a [[star tracker]] platform that would be used to further enhance the existing [[inertial navigation system]]. The system was capable of tracking bright stars in direct sunlight, a challenging requirement. This change meant that the missile could only be carried in locations where the front of the missile could continually observe the sky. This had always been the case on the USAF's [[Boeing B-52 Stratofortress|B-52]] bombers, where they were carried under the wings, but presented a problem for some of the UK designs. In the end, Skybolt was limited to the Vulcan, where its mounting points allowed the nose of the missile to project in front of this aircraft's [[delta wing]].
During development, it was decided that the system could not reach the required accuracy at the desired range without improvements to the guidance system. This led to the introduction of a [[star tracker]] platform that would enhance the existing [[inertial navigation system]]. For this role, the system had to be capable of tracking bright stars in direct sunlight, a challenging requirement. Star trackers have to be provided with a relatively accurate location in order to point their trackers at selected stars. Over a long flight, the INS would drift too much to provide the needed accuracy. Instead, the tracker has to be able to track the stars during flight, continually updating the INS.

This change meant that the missile could only be carried in locations where the front of the missile could continually observe the sky. This had always been the case on the USAF's [[Boeing B-52 Stratofortress|B-52]] bombers, where they were carried under the narrow-chord wings and the nose projected out in front. But this presented a problem for some of the UK designs, especially the [[Handley Page Victor|Victor]], where the layout of the wing, engines and landing gear left the mounting point behind the massive wing's leading edge. As [[Vickers Valiant|Valiant]] had limited range, the decision was made to move forward only with [[Avro Vulcan|Vulcan]], where its mounting points allowed the nose of the missile to project in front of this aircraft's [[delta wing]].


By 1961, several test articles were ready for testing from B-52's, with drop-tests starting in January. In January 1961 a Vulcan visited the Douglas plant at Santa Monica, California, to make sure the modifications to the aircraft were electrically compatible with the missile. In Britain, compatibility trials with mockups started on the Vulcan.<ref name="Brooks114" />
By 1961, several test articles were ready for testing from B-52s, with drop tests starting in January. In January 1961 a Vulcan visited the Douglas plant at Santa Monica, California, to ensure the modifications to the aircraft were electrically compatible with the missile. In Britain, compatibility trials with mockups started on the Vulcan.<ref name="Brooks114" />


Powered tests started in April 1962, but the test series went badly, with the first five trials ending in failure of one sort or another. The first fully successful flight occurred on 19 December 1962.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.astronautix.com/s/skyboltalbm.html |title= Skybolt ALBM |website=astronautix.com}}</ref>
Testing started with unpowered drop tests to ensure safe separating from the launch aircraft. Powered tests started in April 1962, but the test series went badly, with the first five trials ending in failure. The first fully successful flight occurred on 19 December 1962.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.astronautix.com/s/skyboltalbm.html |title=Skybolt ALBM |website=astronautix.com |access-date=11 July 2017 |archive-date=11 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170611062005/http://www.astronautix.com/s/skyboltalbm.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>


===Cancellation===
===Cancellation===
By this point, the value of the Skybolt system in the US had been seriously eroded. The Polaris had recently gone into service, with overall capabilities similar to Skybolt, but with "loiter" times on the order of months instead of hours. Additionally, the US Air Force itself was well into the process of developing the [[Minuteman missile]], whose improved accuracy reduced the need for any bomber attacks. [[Robert McNamara]] was particularly opposed to the bomber force and repeatedly stated he felt that the combination of SLBMs and ICBMs would render them useless. He pressed for the cancellation of Skybolt as an unnecessary program.
By this point, the value of the Skybolt system in the US had been seriously eroded. The Polaris had recently gone into service, with overall capabilities similar to Skybolt, but with "loiter" times on the order of months instead of hours. The US Air Force was well into the process of developing the [[Minuteman missile]], whose improved accuracy reduced the need for any bomber attacks. [[Robert McNamara]] was particularly opposed to the bomber force and repeatedly stated he felt that the combination of SLBMs and ICBMs would render them useless. He pressed for the cancellation of Skybolt as unnecessary.


The British, on the other hand, had canceled all other projects to concentrate fully on Skybolt. When McNamara informed them that they were considering canceling the program in November 1962, a firestorm of protest broke out in the House of Commons. [[Jo Grimond]] noted "Does not this mark the absolute failure of the policy of the independent deterrent? Is it not the case that everybody else in the world knew this, except the Conservative Party in this country?"<ref name=hans17>[http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1962/dec/17/skybolt-missile-talks "Hansard 17 December 1962, SKYBOLT MISSILE (TALKS)"], [[Hansard]], 17 December 1962</ref> President Kennedy officially cancelled the program on 22 December 1962.<ref name="af.mil"/>
The British had canceled all other projects to concentrate fully on Skybolt. When McNamara informed them that they were considering canceling the program in November 1962, a firestorm of protest broke out in the House of Commons. [[Jo Grimond]] noted "Does not this mark the absolute failure of the policy of the independent deterrent? Is it not the case that everybody else in the world knew this, except the Conservative Party in this country?"<ref name=hans17>[https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1962/dec/17/skybolt-missile-talks "Hansard 17 December 1962, SKYBOLT MISSILE (TALKS)"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090717113640/http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1962/dec/17/skybolt-missile-talks |date=17 July 2009 }}, [[Hansard]], 17 December 1962</ref> President Kennedy officially cancelled the program on 22 December 1962.<ref name="af.mil"/>


As the political row grew into a major crisis, an emergency meeting between parties from the US and UK was called, leading to the [[Nassau agreement]]. Over the next few days a [[Polaris Sales Agreement|new plan was hammered out]] that saw the UK purchase the [[Polaris missile|Polaris]] SLBM, but equipped with British warheads that lacked the [[Two-man rule|dual-key]] system. The UK would thus retain its independent deterrent force, although its control passed from the RAF largely to the [[Royal Navy]]. The Polaris, a much better weapon system for the UK, was a major "scoop" and has been referred to as "almost the bargain of the century".<ref>John Dumbrell, [http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?is=1403987742 "A special relationship: Anglo-American relations from the Cold War to Iraq"], Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, p. 174</ref> The RAF kept a tactical nuclear capability with the [[WE.177]] which armed V bombers and later the [[Panavia Tornado]] force.
As the political row grew into a major crisis, an emergency meeting between parties from the US and UK was called, leading to the [[Nassau agreement]]. Over the next few days a [[Polaris Sales Agreement|new plan was hammered out]] that saw the UK purchase the [[Polaris missile|Polaris]] SLBM, but equipped with British warheads that lacked the [[Two-man rule|dual-key]] system. The UK would thus retain its independent deterrent force, although its control passed from the RAF largely to the [[Royal Navy]]. The Polaris, a much better weapon system for the UK, was a major "scoop" and has been referred to as "almost the bargain of the century".<ref>John Dumbrell, [http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?is=1403987742 "A special relationship: Anglo-American relations from the Cold War to Iraq"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080612184750/http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?is=1403987742 |date=12 June 2008 }}, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, p. 174</ref> The RAF kept a tactical nuclear capability with the [[WE.177]] which armed V bombers and later the [[Panavia Tornado]] force.


A B-52G launched the last XGAM-87A missile down the Atlantic Missile Range a day after the program was canceled.<ref>https://archive.is/20120716163108/http://www.af.mil/information/heritage/milestones.asp?dec=1960&sd=01/01/1960&ed=12/31/1969</ref> In June 1963, the XGAM-87A was redesignated as XAGM-48A<ref>Andreas Parsch,2002, http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-48.html</ref>
A B-52G launched the last XGAM-87A missile at the Atlantic Missile Range a day after the program was canceled.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.af.mil/information/heritage/milestones.asp |title=Official Site of the U.S. Air Force – History Milestones |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120716163108/http://www.af.mil/information/heritage/milestones.asp?dec=1960&sd=01%2F01%2F1960&ed=12%2F31%2F1969 |archive-date=16 July 2012 |url-status=dead |access-date=27 December 2011 }}</ref> In June 1963, the XGAM-87A was redesignated as XAGM-48A.<ref>Andreas Parsch,2002, http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-48.html {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171126183515/http://designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-48.html |date=26 November 2017 }}</ref>


==Description==
==Description==
Line 82: Line 85:
Guidance was entirely by inertial platform. The current position was constantly updated from the host aircraft through accurate fixes, meaning that the accuracy of the platform inside the missile was not as critical.
Guidance was entirely by inertial platform. The current position was constantly updated from the host aircraft through accurate fixes, meaning that the accuracy of the platform inside the missile was not as critical.


B-52s were to carry four missiles, two under each wing on the weapons pylon with a dual launcher adapter with the missiles slightly staggered (inboard missile slightly ahead of the outboard missile).<ref>{{cite web |last1=Trevithick |first1=Joseph |title=The B-52 Almost Got An Ahead Of Its Time Air-Launched Ballistic Missile Named Skybolt |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31868/the-b-52-almost-got-an-ahead-of-its-time-air-launched-ballistic-missile-named-skybolt |website=The Drive 23 January 2020 |access-date=12 April 2020}}</ref> The Vulcan carried two missiles, one each on smaller underwing pylons.
B-52s were to carry four missiles, two under each wing on the weapons pylon with a dual launcher adapter with the missiles slightly staggered (inboard missile slightly ahead of the outboard missile).<ref>{{cite web |last1=Trevithick |first1=Joseph |title=The B-52 Almost Got An Ahead Of Its Time Air-Launched Ballistic Missile Named Skybolt |url=https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31868/the-b-52-almost-got-an-ahead-of-its-time-air-launched-ballistic-missile-named-skybolt |website=The Drive 23 January 2020 |date=23 January 2020 |access-date=12 April 2020 |archive-date=12 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200412171337/https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31868/the-b-52-almost-got-an-ahead-of-its-time-air-launched-ballistic-missile-named-skybolt |url-status=live }}</ref> The Vulcan carried two missiles, one each on smaller underwing pylons.


==Survivors==
==Survivors==
* [[RAF Museum Cosford]], Shropshire
* [[RAF Museum Cosford]], Shropshire, England
* [[National Museum of the United States Air Force]], [[Dayton, Ohio]]
* [[National Museum of the United States Air Force]], [[Dayton, Ohio]], United States
* [[Air Force Space & Missile Museum]], [[Cape Canaveral Air Force Station]], Florida.
* [[Air Force Space & Missile Museum]], [[Cape Canaveral Air Force Station]], Florida, United States


==See also==
==See also==
* [[List of military aircraft of the United States]]
* [[List of military aircraft of the United States]]
* [[List of missiles by nation#United States|List of missiles by nation]]
* [[List of missiles by nation#United States|List of missiles by nation]]
* [[AGM-28 Hound Dog]]
* [[AGM-69 SRAM]]


==References==
==References==
Line 104: Line 109:
* Neustadt, Richard E. ''Report to JFK: The Skybolt Crisis in Perspective''. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999. {{ISBN|0-8014-3622-2}}.
* Neustadt, Richard E. ''Report to JFK: The Skybolt Crisis in Perspective''. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999. {{ISBN|0-8014-3622-2}}.
*Matthew Jones. 2019. "[https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/jcws_a_00839 Prelude to the Skybolt Crisis: The Kennedy Administration's Approach to British and French Strategic Nuclear Policies in 1962.]" ''Journal of Cold War Studies''.
*Matthew Jones. 2019. "[https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/jcws_a_00839 Prelude to the Skybolt Crisis: The Kennedy Administration's Approach to British and French Strategic Nuclear Policies in 1962.]" ''Journal of Cold War Studies''.
*Ken Young (2004) The Skybolt Crisis of 1962: Muddle or Mischief?, Journal of Strategic Studies, 27:4, 614-635
*Ken Young (2004) The Skybolt Crisis of 1962: Muddle or Mischief?, Journal of Strategic Studies, 27:4, 614–635


==External links==
==External links==
*[http://www.astronautix.com/s/skybolt.html Skybolt], Encyclopedia Astronautica
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20161228030353/http://astronautix.com/s/skybolt.html Skybolt], Encyclopedia Astronautica


{{US missiles}}
{{US missiles}}
{{USAF missiles}}
{{USAF missiles}}
{{USAF system codes}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Gam-87 Skybolt}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Gam-87 Skybolt}}
[[Category:Cold War air-to-surface missiles of the United States]]
[[Category:Cold War air-to-surface missiles of the United States]]
[[Category:Ballistic missiles of the United States]]
[[Category:Ballistic missiles of the United States]]
[[Category:Nuclear weapons of the United States]]
[[Category:Nuclear missiles of the United States]]
[[Category:Nuclear air-to-surface missiles]]
[[Category:Nuclear air-to-surface missiles]]
[[Category:Abandoned military rocket and missile projects of the United States]]
[[Category:Abandoned military rocket and missile projects of the United States]]
[[Category:Air-launched ballistic missiles]]
[[Category:Air-launched ballistic missiles]]
[[Category:United Kingdom–United States relations]]
[[Category:United Kingdom–United States military relations]]
[[Category:Nuclear weapons of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Nuclear weapons of the United Kingdom]]

Latest revision as of 22:38, 14 May 2024

GAM-87 Skybolt
TypeAir-launched ballistic missile Air-to-surface missile
Production history
ManufacturerDouglas Aircraft, Northrop
Specifications
Mass11,000 pounds (5,000 kg)
Length38 feet 3 inches (11.66 m)
Diameter35 inches (890 mm)
Wingspan5 feet 6 inches (1.68 m)
WarheadW59 thermonuclear weapon (1 megaton)

EngineAerojet General two-stage solid-fuel rocket
Operational
range
1,150 miles (1,850 km)
Flight ceiling300 miles (480 km)
Maximum speed 9,500 miles per hour (15,300 km/h; Mach 12)
Guidance
system
inertial guidance
Launch
platform
Aircraft

The Douglas GAM-87 Skybolt (AGM-48 under the 1962 Tri-service system) was a hypersonic air-launched ballistic missile (ALBM) developed by the United States during the late 1950s. The basic concept was to allow US strategic bombers to launch their weapons from well outside the range of Soviet defenses, as much as 1,000 miles (1,600 km) from their targets. To do this in an air-launched form, a lightweight thermonuclear warhead was needed. Initially, the W47 from the Polaris missile was selected, but it was later replaced by the W59 from the Minuteman missile.

The UK joined the Skybolt program in 1960, intending to use it on their V bomber force. When the design added a star tracker in addition to its inertial navigation system (INS) this meant that it could only be carried externally where the tracker could see the sky. This requirement along with the required ground clearance on takeoff limited it to the Avro Vulcan bomber. Several design decisions in the W47 led the RAF to question its safety, so they intended to use their own Red Snow warheads. This was a heavier warhead and would reduce the range to about 600 miles (970 km), meaning the bombers would have to cross the Soviet coastline to attack Moscow.

Testing began in 1962 and was initially marked by a string of failures. These failures, along with a lack of mission after the successful development of submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), led to its cancellation in December 1962.[1] The UK had decided to base its entire 1960s deterrent force on Skybolt, and its cancellation led to a major disagreement between the UK and US, known today as the "Skybolt Crisis". This was resolved by a series of meetings that led to the Royal Navy gaining the UGM-27 Polaris missile and construction of the Resolution-class submarines to launch them.

History[edit]

Background[edit]

The US Air Force had built up an enormous fleet of strategic bombers during the 1950s, only to see them threatened by the possibility of a surprise attack by Soviet ICBMs. As the US bombers were located at only a small number of air bases, a relatively small fleet of missiles could attack all of them at once. The US had been developing its own ICBMs as well, but early models, like the SM-65 Atlas, required some time to prepare to launch from their surface launchers and were vulnerable to sneak air attack. A carefully timed attack from Soviet bombers against US missiles and their ICBMs against US bomber fields could inflict serious damage.[2]

The one weapon system that was not open to attack was the US Navy's Polaris missile system. The Polaris equipped submarines could cruise in large areas of the Atlantic or Pacific where the Soviet fleet was unable to find them, and launch their missiles with impunity. If the goal of the nuclear force was to maintain deterrence by ensuring that a counterstrike would be launched, Polaris met this goal in a way the existing Air Force fleet could not. This fact was more worrying to the Air Force than the Soviet arsenal and generated a number of internal reports on how to deal with this threat to their dominance in the strategic field.[2]

WS-199 and WS-138[edit]

In response, in 1957 the Air Force began studying solutions to the "Puzzle of Polaris" under the WS-199 program. WS-199 was a grab-bag effort, studying anything that might improve the survivability of the Air Force strike capability. Primary among the concepts were two air-launched ballistic missiles, Bold Orion and High Virgo. These systems would give the Air Force a method somewhat similar to the Navy's; in times of high alert, the bomber force would be sent to holding positions far outside the range of any Soviet defenses, and then launch their missiles on command. Using aerial refueling, a bomber might be expected to be able to loiter for as long as a day.

This system had a major advantage compared to Polaris, as the aircraft could be sent radio instructions to retarget the missiles before launch. In theory, the bombers could be used as a second-strike weapon, attacking only those targets that had been missed in a first-strike, or alternately, being switched from counterforce to countervalue targets or vice versa. Ground-based systems like Atlas and Polaris lacked this ability, and could only be retargeted with a significant amount of effort. Even the latest Air Force design, the LGM-30 Minuteman, required changes in targeting data to be loaded from magnetic tape in a process that took several weeks.[3]

WS-199 was generally successful, but the two ALBMs had a shorter range than desired. The Air Force tendered bids for a longer-range version in early 1959. Douglas Aircraft received the prime contract in May, and in turn subcontracted to Northrop for the guidance system, Aerojet for the propulsion system, and General Electric for the reentry vehicle. The system was initially known as WS-138A and was given the official name GAM-87 Skybolt in 1960.

British involvement[edit]

Skybolt at RAF Museum Cosford Showing the RAF roundel and the manufacturer (Douglas Aircraft) logo. It carries the tail-cone fairing that reduces drag in flight.

At the same time, the Royal Air Force (RAF) was having problems with their MRBM missile project, the Blue Streak, which was long overdue. Even if this was successful it faced the serious problem of basing. No fixed land-based missile system could be credibly installed in the British Isles; they were well within the range of Soviet air strikes. The limited land mass available meant it would be relatively easy for missile sites to be spotted no matter what security measures were taken, and flying time for a jet bomber from the coast to any potential inland location would be on the order of minutes.

This left the deterrent based on their own bomber force, the V bomber fleet, which the RAF had already long concluded would be unable to penetrate Soviet defenses by about 1960. The RAF was in the process of introducing their own stand-off missile, the 950 kilometres (590 mi) ranged Mach 3 Blue Steel. While capable, the missile flew at altitudes and speeds that left it vulnerable to improving SAMs, and it had a number of reliability and serviceability issues that made it less than ideal. A faster, longer-ranged version was being talked about, Blue Steel II, but it would be some time before it could enter service.

The long-range Skybolt would eliminate the need for both the Blue Streak and the Blue Steel II. Blue Steel II was canceled in December 1959 and the British Cabinet decided in February 1960 to cancel Blue Streak as well. Prime Minister Macmillan met President Eisenhower in March 1960 and agreed to purchase 144 Skybolts for the RAF. By agreement, British funding for research and development was limited to that required to modify the V bombers to take the missile, but the British were allowed to fit their own warheads. In exchange, the Americans were given nuclear submarine basing facilities in Scotland.[4] Following the agreement, the Blue Streak program was formally canceled in April 1960 and in May 1960 an agreement for an initial order of 100 Skybolts was concluded.[4]

Avro was made an associate contractor to manage the Skybolt program for the United Kingdom and four different schemes were submitted to find a platform for the missile.[4] A number of different aircraft were considered, including a variant of the Vickers VC10 airliner and two of the current V bombers, the Avro Vulcan and Handley Page Victor.[4] It was decided to use the Vulcan to initially carry two missiles each on hardpoints outboard of the main landing gear.[4]

Development and testing[edit]

Avro Vulcan and B-52 over Edwards Air Force Base

During development, it was decided that the system could not reach the required accuracy at the desired range without improvements to the guidance system. This led to the introduction of a star tracker platform that would enhance the existing inertial navigation system. For this role, the system had to be capable of tracking bright stars in direct sunlight, a challenging requirement. Star trackers have to be provided with a relatively accurate location in order to point their trackers at selected stars. Over a long flight, the INS would drift too much to provide the needed accuracy. Instead, the tracker has to be able to track the stars during flight, continually updating the INS.

This change meant that the missile could only be carried in locations where the front of the missile could continually observe the sky. This had always been the case on the USAF's B-52 bombers, where they were carried under the narrow-chord wings and the nose projected out in front. But this presented a problem for some of the UK designs, especially the Victor, where the layout of the wing, engines and landing gear left the mounting point behind the massive wing's leading edge. As Valiant had limited range, the decision was made to move forward only with Vulcan, where its mounting points allowed the nose of the missile to project in front of this aircraft's delta wing.

By 1961, several test articles were ready for testing from B-52s, with drop tests starting in January. In January 1961 a Vulcan visited the Douglas plant at Santa Monica, California, to ensure the modifications to the aircraft were electrically compatible with the missile. In Britain, compatibility trials with mockups started on the Vulcan.[4]

Testing started with unpowered drop tests to ensure safe separating from the launch aircraft. Powered tests started in April 1962, but the test series went badly, with the first five trials ending in failure. The first fully successful flight occurred on 19 December 1962.[5]

Cancellation[edit]

By this point, the value of the Skybolt system in the US had been seriously eroded. The Polaris had recently gone into service, with overall capabilities similar to Skybolt, but with "loiter" times on the order of months instead of hours. The US Air Force was well into the process of developing the Minuteman missile, whose improved accuracy reduced the need for any bomber attacks. Robert McNamara was particularly opposed to the bomber force and repeatedly stated he felt that the combination of SLBMs and ICBMs would render them useless. He pressed for the cancellation of Skybolt as unnecessary.

The British had canceled all other projects to concentrate fully on Skybolt. When McNamara informed them that they were considering canceling the program in November 1962, a firestorm of protest broke out in the House of Commons. Jo Grimond noted "Does not this mark the absolute failure of the policy of the independent deterrent? Is it not the case that everybody else in the world knew this, except the Conservative Party in this country?"[6] President Kennedy officially cancelled the program on 22 December 1962.[1]

As the political row grew into a major crisis, an emergency meeting between parties from the US and UK was called, leading to the Nassau agreement. Over the next few days a new plan was hammered out that saw the UK purchase the Polaris SLBM, but equipped with British warheads that lacked the dual-key system. The UK would thus retain its independent deterrent force, although its control passed from the RAF largely to the Royal Navy. The Polaris, a much better weapon system for the UK, was a major "scoop" and has been referred to as "almost the bargain of the century".[7] The RAF kept a tactical nuclear capability with the WE.177 which armed V bombers and later the Panavia Tornado force.

A B-52G launched the last XGAM-87A missile at the Atlantic Missile Range a day after the program was canceled.[8] In June 1963, the XGAM-87A was redesignated as XAGM-48A.[9]

Description[edit]

The GAM-87 was powered by a two-stage solid-fuel rocket motor. The missile was fitted with a tailcone to reduce drag while on the pylon, which was ejected shortly after being dropped from the plane. After first stage burnout, the Skybolt coasted for a while before the second stage ignited. First stage control was by eight movable tail fins, while the second stage was equipped with a gimballed nozzle.

Guidance was entirely by inertial platform. The current position was constantly updated from the host aircraft through accurate fixes, meaning that the accuracy of the platform inside the missile was not as critical.

B-52s were to carry four missiles, two under each wing on the weapons pylon with a dual launcher adapter with the missiles slightly staggered (inboard missile slightly ahead of the outboard missile).[10] The Vulcan carried two missiles, one each on smaller underwing pylons.

Survivors[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b http://www.af.mil/search/generalsearch.asp?q=skybolt&site=AFLINK[permanent dead link]
  2. ^ a b Kaplan, Fred (1991). The Wizards of Armageddon. Stanford University Press. pp. 237–238.
  3. ^ Arkin, William (November 1996). "The Six-Hundred Million Dollar Mouse". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 52 (6): 68. Bibcode:1996BuAtS..52f..68A. doi:10.1080/00963402.1996.11456682.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Brooks 1982, pp. 114–123
  5. ^ "Skybolt ALBM". astronautix.com. Archived from the original on 11 June 2017. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  6. ^ "Hansard 17 December 1962, SKYBOLT MISSILE (TALKS)" Archived 17 July 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Hansard, 17 December 1962
  7. ^ John Dumbrell, "A special relationship: Anglo-American relations from the Cold War to Iraq" Archived 12 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, p. 174
  8. ^ "Official Site of the U.S. Air Force – History Milestones". Archived from the original on 16 July 2012. Retrieved 27 December 2011.
  9. ^ Andreas Parsch,2002, http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-48.html Archived 26 November 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  10. ^ Trevithick, Joseph (23 January 2020). "The B-52 Almost Got An Ahead Of Its Time Air-Launched Ballistic Missile Named Skybolt". The Drive 23 January 2020. Archived from the original on 12 April 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2020.

Bibliography[edit]

  • Brookes, Andrew (1982). V Force – The History of Britain's Airborne Deterrent. London: Book Club Associates.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]