Wikipedia talk:Template index/Cleanup

Latest comment: 1 year ago by FOARP in topic WP:NOT?

Expand languages

edit

There is a discussion about whether {{expand language}} is a "cleanup" template and should be included with the {{multiple issues}} wrapper at Template talk:Multiple issues#Expand by language templates. MB 14:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Individual message boxes: Issues with style or format" Sub-section

edit

Why is "Individual message boxes: Issues with style or format" subsection inside "Verifiability and sources" section? Meridiana solare (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

That section appears limited to "style and format" as it applies to source material and how it is cited in the article. I'm not seeing any message boxes related to overall style and format of the prose or the article as a whole. --N8wilson 🔔 19:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, N8. I can see, now. Meridiana solare (talk) 19:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Libel / defamatory

edit

Is there any way to tag for potentaially libelous or defamatory content?

Eg where the tone is desparaging towards a person or entity or references are selective for those that disparage.

this would fall under WP:BIAS WP:POV but go beyond these Jennpublic (talk) 20:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

WP:NOT?

edit

Is there a clean-up tag for possibly veering into WP:NOT territory? I get that we should probably just AFD articles that fail this (though this is also true for notability-fails) but sometimes you'd like to give the people who work on the article a chance. FOARP (talk) 09:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply