Wikipedia:Verifiability: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1227554432 by Peter Gulutzan (talk): lucky for you it is not: i can tell because i read it
don't need three shortcuts
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2:
{{Redirect|WP:V|discussing particular sources|Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard|vandalism|Wikipedia:Vandalism}}
{{pp|small=yes}}
{{policy|WP:V|WP:VER|WP:VERIFY}}
{{nutshell|Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by [[WP:INCITE|inline citations]].}}
{{Content policy list}}
Line 29:
All content must be verifiable. '''The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material''', and it is satisfied by providing an [[Wikipedia:Inline citation|inline citation]] to a reliable source that directly supports{{efn|name="directly supports"|A source "directly supports" a given piece of material if the information is present {{em|explicitly}} in the source, so that using this source to support the material is not a violation of [[Wikipedia:No original research]]. The location of any citation—including whether one is present in the article at all—is unrelated to whether a source directly supports the material. For questions about where and how to place citations, see [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]], {{section link|Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|Citations}}, etc.}} the contribution.{{efn|Once an editor has provided any source they believe, in good faith, to be sufficient, then any editor who later removes the material must articulate specific problems that would justify its exclusion from Wikipedia (e.g. why the source is unreliable; the source does not support the claim; [[WP:DUE|undue emphasis]]; [[WP:NOT|unencyclopedic content]]; etc.). If necessary, all editors are then expected to help achieve [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]], and any problems with the text or sourcing should be fixed before the material is added back.}}
 
{{anchor|Unsourced}}Using inline citations, provide reliable, published sources for all:
 
* all [[Direct quotation|direct quotations]],
* all material whose verifiability has been challenged
* all material whose verifiability is [[Wikipedia:Likely to be challenged|likely to be challenged]], and
* all contentious matter about [[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Remove_contentious_material_that_is_unsourced_or_poorly_sourced|living and recently deceased persons]].
 
The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article. Cite the source clearly, ideally giving page number(s)—though sometimes a section, chapter, or other division may be appropriate instead; see [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] for details of how to do this.