Notice

This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/129999.2

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNouwens, Midas
dc.contributor.authorLiccardi, Ilaria
dc.contributor.authorVeale, Michael
dc.contributor.authorKarger, David R
dc.contributor.authorKagal, Lalana
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T21:03:49Z
dc.date.available2021-02-24T21:03:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-04
dc.identifier.isbn9781450367080
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129999
dc.description.abstractNew consent management platforms (CMPs) have been introduced to the web to conform with the EU's General Data Protection Regulation, particularly its requirements for consent when companies collect and process users' personal data. This work analyses how the most prevalent CMP designs affect people's consent choices. We scraped the designs of the five most popular CMPs on the top 10,000 websites in the UK (n=680). We found that dark patterns and implied consent are ubiquitous; only 11.8% meet our minimal requirements based on European law. Second, we conducted a field experiment with 40 participants to investigate how the eight most common designs affect consent choices. We found that notification style (banner or barrier) has no effect; removing the opt-out button from the first page increases consent by 22-23 percentage points; and providing more granular controls on the first page decreases consent by 8-20 percentage points. This study provides an empirical basis for the necessary regulatory action to enforce the GDPR, in particular the possibility of focusing on the centralised, third-party CMP services as an effective way to increase compliance.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF (Award 1639994)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376321en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titleDark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop-ups and Demonstrating their Influenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNouwens, Midas et al. "Dark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop-ups and Demonstrating their Influence." Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 2020, Honolulu, Hawaii, Association for Computing Machinery, April 2020. © 2020 ACMen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systemsen_US
dc.eprint.versionOriginal manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-12-23T15:56:35Z
dspace.orderedauthorsNouwens, M; Liccardi, I; Veale, M; Karger, D; Kagal, Len_US
dspace.date.submission2020-12-23T15:56:39Z
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version