Evaluation of a national telemedicine initiative in the Veterans Health Administration: Factors associated with successful implementation
Abstract
Background
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to evaluate implementation facilitators and barriers of Specialty Care Access Network-Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (SCAN-ECHO) within the Veterans Health Administration. SCAN-ECHO is a video teleconferencing-based programme where specialist teams train and mentor remotely-located primary care providers in providing routine speciality care for common chronic illnesses. The goal of SCAN-ECHO was to improve access to speciality care for Veterans. The aim of this study was to provide guidance and support for the implementation and spread of SCAN-ECHO.
Methods
Semi-structured telephone interviews with 55 key informants (primary care providers, specialists and support staff) were conducted post-implementation with nine sites and analysed using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs. Data were analysed to distinguish sites based on level of implementation measured by the numbers of SCAN-ECHO sessions. Surveys with all SCAN-ECHO sites further explored implementation information.
Results
Analysis of the interviews revealed three of 14 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs that distinguished between low and high implementation sites: design quality and packaging; compatibility; and reflecting and evaluating. The survey data generally supported these findings, while also revealing a fourth distinguishing construct – leadership engagement. All sites expressed positive attitudes toward SCAN-ECHO, despite struggling with the complexity of programme implementation.
Conclusions
Recommendations based on the findings include: (a) expend more effort in developing and distributing educational materials; (b) restructure the delivery process to improve programme compatibility; (c) establish an audit and feedback mechanism for monitoring and improving the programme; (d) engage in more upfront planning to reduce complexity; and (e) obtain local leadership support for providing primary care providers with dedicated time for participation.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. McQueen L, Mittman BS, Demakis JG. Overview of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI). J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 339–343.
2. Rosenblatt RA, Andrilla CH, Catlin M, et al. Geographic and specialty distribution of US physicians trained to treat opioid use disorder. Ann Fam Med 2015; 13: 23–26.
3. Baldwin LM, Andrilla CH, Porter MP, et al. Treatment of early-stage prostate cancer among rural and urban patients. Cancer 2013; 119: 3067–3075.
4. Rosenblatt RA, Andrilla CH, Curtin T, et al. shortages of medical personnel at community health centers: Implications for planned expansion. JAMA 2006; 295: 1042–1049.
5. Kirsh S, Ho P, Aron D. Providing specialty consultant expertise to primary care: An expanding spectrum of modalities. Mayo Clin Proc 2014; 89: 1416–1426.
6. Kirsh S, Su G, Sales A, et al. Access to outpatient specialty care: Solutions from an integrated health care system. Am J Med Qual 2014; 30(1): 88–90.
7. Arora S, Geppert CM, Kalishman S, et al. Academic health center management of chronic diseases through knowledge networks: Project ECHO. Acad Med 2007; 82: 154–160.
8. Colleran K, Harding E, Kipp BJ, et al. Building capacity to reduce disparities in diabetes: Training community health workers using an integrated distance learning model. Diabetes Educ 2012; 38: 386–396.
9. Dubin RE, Flannery J, Taenzer P, et al. ECHO Ontario chronic pain & opioid stewardship: Providing access and building capacity for primary care providers in underserviced, rural, and remote communities. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 209: 15–22.
10. Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci 2013; 8: 51–51.
11. Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, et al. A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci 2016, pp. 11–72.
12. Cresswell JW. A concise introduction to mixed methods research, Los Angeles: Sage, 2015.
13. Hill CE, Knox S, Thompson BJ, et al. Consensual qualitative research: An update. J Couns Psychol 2005; 52: 196–205.
14. Hill CE, Thompson BJ, Williams EN. A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. Couns Psychol 1997; 25: 517–572.
15. Rihoux B, Ragin CC Why compare? Why configurational comparative methods? In: Rihoux B, Ragin CC (eds). Configurational comparative methods, Los Angeles: Sage, 2009, pp. xvii–xx.
16. Averill JB. Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res 2002; 12: 855–866.
17. Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, et al. (2009) Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 4(1): 50.
18. Powell BJ, McMillen C, Proctor EK, et al. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev 2012; 69: 123–157.
19. Jarvis-Selinger S, Chan E, Payne R, et al. Clinical telehealth across the disciplines: Lessons learned. Telemed J E Health 2008; 14: 720–725.
20. Lee A and Billings M. Telehealth implementation in a skilled nursing facility: Case report for physical therapist practice in Washington. Phys Ther 2016; 96: 252–259.
21. Saigi-Rubíó F, Jiménez-Zarco A, Torrent-Sellens J. Determinants of the intention to use telemedicine: Evidence from primary care physicians. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2016; 32: 29–36.
22. Vinson M, McCallum R, Thornlow DK, et al. Design, implementation, and evaluation of population-specific telehealth nursing services. Nurs Econ 2011; 29: 265–265.
23. May C, Harrison R, Finch T, et al. Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 596–604.
24. Ohl M, Dillon D, Moeckli J, et al. Mixed-methods evaluation of a telehealth collaborative care program for persons with HIV infection in a rural setting. J Gen Intern Med 2013; 28: 1165–1173.
25. Wade VA, Taylor AD, Kidd MR, et al. Transitioning a home telehealth project into a sustainable, large-scale service: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16: 183–193.
26. Broens THF, Huis in’t Veld RMHA, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, et al. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: A literature study. J Telemed Telecare 2007; 13: 303–309.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: November 30, 2016
Issue published: April 2018
Keywords
PubMed: 27909208
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 904
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 29 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 0
- The ENGAGE study: a 3-arm randomized hybrid type 1 effectiveness and i...
- What Should Healthcare Systems Consider When Modernizing Call Centers?...
- Feasibility of Implementing a Mindfulness-Based Online Program for Lat...
- Improving the self‐efficacy, knowledge, and attitude of nurses regardi...
- Describing implementation outcomes for a virtual community of practice...
- A scoping review of applications of the Consolidated Framework for Imp...
- Participatory user requirements elicitation, validation, and prioritiz...
- Addressing Hypertension Outcomes Using Telehealth and Population Healt...
- Understanding Telemedicine's “New Normal”: Variations in Telemedicine ...
- The Future of Sleep Medicine: A Patient-Centered Model of Care
- Workforce Development to Improve Access to Pain Care for Veterans: A Q...
- Evaluation of multi-level barriers and facilitators in a large diabeti...
- Identifying and understanding the contextual factors that shaped mid-i...
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing telehealth services during t...
- Describing the delivery of clinical pharmacy services via telehealth: ...
- A Shortage of Neurologists – We Must Act Now
- Provider Perceptions of Telemedicine Video Visits to Home in a Veteran...
- Misalignment between coronavirus financial aid and public health polic...
- Implementing a complex psychosocial intervention for unstably housed V...
- Barriers and facilitators in implementing a pilot, pragmatic, telemedi...
- A systematic scoping review of change management practices used for te...
- Virtual academic detailing (e-Detailing): A vital tool during the COVI...
- A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-ECHO Program Using ...
- Identifying the Roles of Healthcare Leaders in HIT Implementation: A S...
- Implementing Exercise in Healthcare Settings: The Potential of Impleme...
- Telehealth at the US Department of Veterans Affairs after Hurricane Sa...
- Blind spots in telemedicine: a qualitative study of staff workarounds ...
- Virtual Consultations Through the Veterans Administration SCAN‐ECHO Pr...
- A pilot study using telehealth to implement antimicrobial stewardship ...
- Telestroke Adoption Among Community Hospitals in North Carolina: A Cro...
- Feasibility of Smartphones for Real-time Assessment of Adherence Behav...
- Smartphones for Real-time Assessment of Adherence Behavior and Symptom...
- Association of Provider Specialty and Multidisciplinary Care With Hepa...
- The Development of a Telemedicine Planning Framework Based on Needs As...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
