Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online December 28, 2012

Leading Voices in the Denier Choir: Conservative Columnists’ Dismissal of Global Warming and Denigration of Climate Science

Abstract

The conservative “echo chamber” is a crucial element of the climate change denial machine. Although social scientists have begun to examine the role of conservative media in the denial campaign, this article reports the first examination of conservative newspaper columnists. Syndicated columnists are very influential because they reach a large audience. We analyze 203 opinion editorials (“op-eds”) written by 80 different columnists published from 2007 to 2010, a period that saw a number of crucial events and policy proposals regarding climate change. We focus on the key topics the columnists address and the skeptical arguments they employ. The overall results reveal a highly dismissive view of climate change and critical stance toward climate science among these influential conservative pundits. They play a crucial role in amplifying the denial machine’s messages to a broad segment of the American public.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Akerlof K., Rowan K. E., Fitzgerald D., Cedeno A. Y. (2012). Communication of climate projections in US media amid politicization of model science. Nature Climate Change, 2, 648-654.
Antilla L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 338-352.
Beder S. (1999, March–April). Corporate hijacking of the greenhouse debate. Ecologist, 29, 119-122.
Begley S. (2007, August 13). The truth about denial. Newsweek, 150, 20-29.
Boykoff M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Boykoff M. T., Boykoff J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136.
Brock D. (2004). The Republican noise machine: Right-wing media and how it corrupts democracy. New York, NY: Crown.
Ceccarelli L. (2011). Manufactured scientific controversy: Science, rhetoric, and public debate. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 14, 195-228.
Davenport C. (2011). Heads in the sand. National Journal. Retrieved from http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/heads-in-the-sand-20111201?mrefid=site_search&page=1
Dunlap R. E., McCright A. M. (2010). Climate change denial: Sources, actors, and strategies. In Lever-Tracy C. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of climate change and society (pp. 240-259). London, UK: Routledge.
Dunlap R. E., McCright A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In Dryzek J. S., Norgaard R. B., Schlosberg D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change (pp. 144-160). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
Feldman L., Maibach E. W., Roser-Renouf C., Leiserowitz A. (2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. International Journal of Press/Politics, 17, 3-31.
Gelbspan R. (1997). The heat is on. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gelbspan R. (2004). Boiling point. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Grandia K. (2009). Research on the “sponsors” behind the Heartland’s New York Climate Change Conference. Retrieved from http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Heartland%2009%20climate%20conference%20sponsors%20the%20RESEARCH%20REPORT.pdf
Greenpeace. (2010a). Dealing in doubt: The climate denial industry and climate science. Retrieved from http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/publications/reports/dealing-in-doubt/
Greenpeace. (2010b). Koch Industries secretly funding the climate denial machine. Retrieved from http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/report/2010/3/executive-summary-koch-indus.pdf
Hamilton C. (2010). Requiem for a species. London, UK: Earthscan.
Hoffman A. J. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24, 3-33.
Hoggan J., Littlemore R. (2009). Climate cover-up: The crusade to deny global warming. Vancouver, Canada: Greystone Books.
Holliman R. (2011). Advocacy in the tail: Exploring the implications of “Climategate” for science journalism and public debate in the digital age. Journalism, 12, 832-846.
Jamieson K. H., Cappella J. N. (2008). Echo chamber. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Knight G., Greenberg J. (2011). Talk of the enemy: Adversarial framing and climate change discourse. Social Movement Studies, 10, 323-340.
Lahsen M. (2008). Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of a physicist “trio” supporting the backlash against global warming. Global Environmental Change, 18, 204-219.
Leiserowitz A. A., Maibach E. W., Roser-Renouf C., Smith N., Dawson E. (2013). Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist.
McCright A. M. (2007). Dealing with climate change contrarians. In Moser S. C., Dilling L. (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 200-212). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McCright A. M., Dunlap R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 499-522.
McCright A. M., Dunlap R. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 50, 348-373.
McCright A. M., Dunlap R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: The American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate change science and policy. Theory, Culture, and Society, 27, 100-103.
McCright A. M., Dunlap R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change: Political polarization in the American public’s views of global warming. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194.
McKewon E. (2012). Talking Points Ammo: The use of neoliberal think tank fantasy themes to delegitimise scientific knowledge of climate change in Australian newspapers, Journalism Studies 13(2), 277-297.
McKnight D. (2010). A change in the climate? The journalism of opinion at News Corporation. Journalism, 11, 693-706.
Media Matters in America. (2007). Black and white and re(a)d all over: The conservative advantage in syndicated op-ed columns. Retrieved from http://mediamatters.org/reports/oped
Mooney C. (2005, May–June). Some like it hot. Mother Jones, 30, 36-49.
Norgaard K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Oreskes N., Conway E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury.
Painter J. (2011). Poles apart: The international reporting of climate scepticism. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
Pearce F. (2010). The climate files. London, UK: Guardian Books.
Pooley E. (2010). The climate war: True believers, power brokers, and the fight to save the earth. New York, NY: Hyperion.
Powell J. L. (2011). The inquisition of climate science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Rahmstorf S. (2004). The climate skeptics. In Re Munich (Ed.), Weather catastrophes and climate change (pp. 76-83). Munich, Germany: Munich Re.
Roberts J. T., Parks B. C. (2007). A climate of injustice: Global inequality, north-south politics, and climate policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Union of Concerned Scientists. (2007). Smoke, mirrors, and hot air. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.
Washington H., Cook J. (2011). Climate change denial: Heads in the sand. London, UK: Earthscan.
Wolcott J. (2007, May). Rush to judgment. Vanity Fair, 561, 100-106.
Young N. (2011). Working the fringes: The role of letters to the editor in advancing non-standard media narratives about climate change. Public Understanding of Science. Advance online publication.

Biographies

Shaun W. Elsasser is a PhD candidate in the Department of Sociology at Oklahoma State University. His interests include environmental sociology, sexuality and research methods.
Riley E. Dunlap is Regents Professor and Dresser Professor in the Department of Sociology at Oklahoma State University, and a Past-President of the International Sociological Association’s Research Committee on Environment and Society.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: December 28, 2012
Issue published: June 2013

Keywords

  1. climate change
  2. denial machine
  3. conservative columnists
  4. skeptical arguments

Rights and permissions

© 2013 SAGE Publications.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shaun W. Elsasser
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
Riley E. Dunlap
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA

Notes

Riley E. Dunlap, Department of Sociology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in American Behavioral Scientist.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 4426

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 114 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

  1. Towards a spectrum of dissent: A content analysis of Hawai‘i’s invasiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Confirmation Bias in Seeking Climate Information: Employing Relative S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The politics of politicization: Climate change debates in Canadian pri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Developing an Ad Hominem typology for clas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Process skeptical populist framing of climate change in right-leaning ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Climate delay discourses present in global mainstream television cover...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. How Media, Information Sources, and Trust Shape Climate Change Denial ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. (Why) Is Misinformation a Problem?
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  9. Mapping the climate change attitude: careless or care less?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Protecting democracy from disinformation: Implications for a model of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Climate obstruction and Facebook advertising: how a sample of climate ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Global Narratives of Ecological Modernization: The Construction of Cli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Introduction
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Persuasive System Design for Climate Change Awareness
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Technical Summary
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Technische Zusammenfassung
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Kapitel 20. Mediendiskurse und -strukturen
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Active versus passive: evaluating the effectiveness of inoculation tec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Divine attribution? The interaction of religious and secular beliefs o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Interventions Based on Social Norms Could Benefit From Considering Adv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Humor gráfico y negacionismo científico: un estudio comparado de las v...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Análisis discursivo del escepticismo climático en los medios impresos ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Knowledge of majority scientific agreement on anthropogenic climate ch...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Media coverage of climate change induced migration: Implications for m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Understanding Influences, Misinformation, and Fact-Checking Concerning...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Governing for resilience: a new epoch in U.S. environmental policy and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Demand and Sustainability of Palm Oil Plantation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Understanding and Countering Misinformation About Climate Change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Grundlagen
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Computer-assisted classification of contrarian claims about climate ch...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Effects of consensus messages and political ideology on climate change...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Networks of Opposition: A Structural Analysis of U.S. Climate Change C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Current surveys may underestimate climate change skepticism evidence f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Of pathogens and party lines: Social conservatism positively associate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Inoculation theory in the post‐truth era: Extant findings and new fron...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Integrating Mathematics and Science Teaching in the Context of Educati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. For the love of sun and wind? Proximity to renewable energy facilities...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. A Survey Instrument to Measure Skeptics’ (Dis)Trust in Climate Science
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Stuck in Dangerous Carbon-Polluting Practices?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Are Safe Social Practices on the Horizon?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. The International Reach of the Koch Brothers Network
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Climate change—that is not real! A comparative analysis of climate-sce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Hubs and Authorities in the Koch Brothers Network
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. U.S. states initiation of energy efficiency policies in the era of cli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Politics and Corporate‐Sector Environmentally Significant Actions: The...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Contrasting communications of sustainability science in the media cove...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. The triangular relationship between public concern for environmental i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Online misinformation about climate change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. In climate news, statements from large businesses and opponents of cli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. A Dynamic Perspective on Publics and Counterpublics: The Role of the B...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. The Climate Action Simulation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. “Reporting on climate change: A computational analysis of U.S. newspap...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Attacking science on social media: How user comments affect perceived ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  55. An Issue of Scale: The Challenge of Time, Space and Multitude in Susta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. The accuracy of German citizens’ confidence in their climate change kn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Telling one story, or many? An ecolinguistic analysis of climate chang...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. The existential threat from cyber-enabled information warfare
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Elite Influence on Climate Change Skepticism: Evidence from Close Gube...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. The growth of climate change misinformation in US philanthropy: eviden...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Deliberative Democracy in Dark Times
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Understanding and Countering Misinformation About Climate Change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Climate Hypocrisies: A Comparative Study of News Discourse
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Characterizing the climate issue context in Mexico: reporting on clima...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Mobilizing Doubt: The Legal Mobilization of Climate Denialist Groups
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Does climate denialism still matter? The prevalence of alternative fra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Echo Chambers of Denial: Explaining User Comments on Climate Change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) scie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. OBSOLETE: Denial Versus Reality of Climate Change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Denial Versus Reality of Climate Change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Another avenue of action: an examination of climate change countermove...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Response by Cook to “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus”
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific l...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. The Media and the Major Emitters: Media Coverage of International Clim...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Environmental Risk Exposure, Risk Perception, Political Ideology and S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Taking climate change seriously: An analysis of op-ed articles in Span...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Expanding the range of environmental values: Political orientation, mo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Assessing ExxonMobil’s climate change communications (1977–2014)
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Do Conservative Media Provide a Forum for Skeptical Voices? The Link B...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. The impact of elite frames and motivated reasoning on beliefs in a glo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Climate Change: US Public Opinion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. A changing climate of skepticism: The factors shaping climate change c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  86. Arguments and actors in recent debates over US genetically modified or...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverag...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Measuring and modeling Russian newspaper coverage of climate change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Mapping the minds of the mediators: The cognitive frames of climate jo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  91. The ‘climatism’ cartel: why climate change deniers oppose market-based...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. Hurricanes and hegemony: A qualitative analysis of micro-level climate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Climate Skepticism in British Newspapers, 2007–2011
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. A blind expert test of contrarian claims about climate data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. The Climate Change Challenge and Barriers to the Exercise of Foresight...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. The “Pause” in Global Warming: Turning a Routine Fluctuation into a Pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. Social futures of global climate change: A structural phenomenology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Polluted Discourse: Communication and Myths in a Climate of Denial
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. The Ethics of Belief, Cognition, and Climate Change Pseudoskepticism: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Constructions of climate justice in German, Indian and US media
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Climate skepticism and the manufacture of doubt: can dissent in scienc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. Sea-Level Rise Policy as Attention Intervention
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. The ideological divide and climate change opinion: “top-down†and â...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. Future-oriented women will pay to reduce global warming: Mediation via...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. Media Frames and Cognitive Accessibility: What Do “Global Warming” and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. Raising Climate Literacy Through Addressing Misinformation: Case Studi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Between Consensus and Denial...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. A Healthy Bottom Line...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. Mapping the climate sceptical blogosphere
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. The moral basis of sustainable society: the Gandhian concept of ecolog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  114. Climate Change on Twitter: Topics, Communities and Conversations about...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. Media Context and Reporting Opportunities on Climate Change: 2012 vers...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  116. Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  117. Climate change and extreme weather in the USA: discourse analysis and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  118. Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Cli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text