Automated Abdominal Segmentation of CT Scans for Body Composition Analysis Using Deep Learning

References

• 1. Gonzalez MC, Pastore CA, Orlandi SP, Heymsfield SB. Obesity paradox in cancer: new insights provided by body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;99(5):999–1005.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2. Aust S, Knogler T, Pils D, et al. Skeletal muscle depletion and markers for cancer cachexia are strong prognostic factors in epithelial ovarian cancer. PLoS One 2015;10(10):e0140403.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3. Malietzis G, Currie AC, Athanasiou T, et al. Influence of body composition profile on outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2016;103(5):572–580.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4. Jean N, Somers VK, Sochor O, Medina-Inojosa J, Llano EM, Lopez-Jimenez F. Normal-weight obesity: implications for cardiovascular health. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2014;16(12):464.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5. Sheetz KH, Waits SA, Terjimanian MN, et al. Cost of major surgery in the sarcopenic patient. J Am Coll Surg 2013;217(5):813–818.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6. Sugimoto M, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, et al. Decreased skeletal muscle volume is a predictive factor for poorer survival in patients undergoing surgical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2018;22(5):831–839.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7. Abelson P, Kennedy D. The obesity epidemic. Science 2004;304(5676):1413–1413.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8. Seabolt LA, Welch EB, Silver HJ. Imaging methods for analyzing body composition in human obesity and cardiometabolic disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2015;1353(1):41–59.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9. Mourtzakis M, Prado CMM, Lieffers JR, Reiman T, McCargar LJ, Baracos VE. A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2008;33(5):997–1006.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 10. Mensink SD, Spliethoff JW, Belder R, Klaase JM, Bezooijen R, Slump CH. Development of automated quantification of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes from abdominal CT scans. In: Medical Imaging 2011: Computer-Aided Diagnosis. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2011; 79632Q. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/7963/79632Q/Development-of-automated-quantification-of-visceral-and-subcutaneous-adipose-tissue/10.1117/12.878017.short. Accessed April 13, 2018.
  Google Scholar
• 11. Kim YJ, Lee SH, Kim TY, Park JY, Choi SH, Kim KG. Body fat assessment method using CT images with separation mask algorithm. J Digit Imaging 2013;26(2):155–162.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 12. Parikh AM, Coletta AM, Yu ZH, et al. Development and validation of a rapid and robust method to determine visceral adipose tissue volume using computed tomography images. PLoS One 2017;12(8):e0183515.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13. Pednekar A, Bandekar AN, Kakadiaris IA, Naghavi M. Automatic segmentation of abdominal fat from CT data. In: Application of Computer Vision, 2005 WACV/MOTIONS’05 Vol 1 Seventh IEEE Workshops on. IEEE, 2005; 308–315. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4129496/. Accessed April 13, 2018.
  Google Scholar
• 14. Hussein S, Green A, Watane A, Papadakis G, Osman M, Bagci U. Context Driven Label Fusion for segmentation of Subcutaneous and Visceral Fat in CT Volumes. arXiv [cs.CV]. 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.04958. Accessed April 13, 2018.
  Google Scholar
• 15. Kullberg J, Hedström A, Brandberg J, et al. Automated analysis of liver fat, muscle and adipose tissue distribution from CT suitable for large-scale studies. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):10425.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 16. Agarwal C, Dallal AH, Arbabshirani MR, Patel A, Moore G. Unsupervised quantification of abdominal fat from CT images using Greedy Snakes. In: Medical Imaging 2017: Image Processing. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2017; 101332T. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/10133/101332T/Unsupervised-quantification-of-abdominal-fat-from-CT-images-using-Greedy/10.1117/12.2254139.short. Accessed April 13, 2018.
  Google Scholar
• 17. Popuri K, Cobzas D, Esfandiari N, Baracos V, Jägersand M. Body composition assessment in axial CT images using FEM-based automatic segmentation of skeletal muscle. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016;35(2):512–520.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18. Zhang W, Liu J, Yao J, Summers RM. Segmenting the thoracic, abdominal and pelvic musculature on CT scans combining atlas-based model and active contour model. In: Medical Imaging 2013: Computer-Aided Diagnosis. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2013; 867008. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/8670/867008/Segmenting-the-thoracic-abdominal-and-pelvic-musculature-on-CT-scans/10.1117/12.2007970.short. Accessed April 13, 2018.
  Google Scholar
• 19. Chung H, Cobzas D, Lieffers J, Birdsell L, Baracos V. Automated segmentation of muscle and adipose tissue on CT images for human body composition analysis. https://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/∼dana/Papers/09SPIE_muscleFat.pdf. Accessed April 13, 2018.
  Google Scholar
• 20. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, et al. Visceral adipose tissue: relations between single-slice areas and total volume. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80(2):271–278.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21. Potretzke AM, Schmitz KH, Jensen MD. Preventing overestimation of pixels in computed tomography assessment of visceral fat. Obes Res 2004;12(10):1698–1701.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22. Wang Y, Qiu Y, Thai T, Moore K, Liu H, Zheng B. A two-step convolutional neural network based computer-aided detection scheme for automatically segmenting adipose tissue volume depicting on CT images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2017;144:97–104.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23. Lee H, Troschel FM, Tajmir S, et al. Pixel-level deep segmentation: artificial intelligence quantifies muscle on computed tomography for body morphometric analysis. J Digit Imaging 2017;30(4):487–498.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 24. Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE 1998;86(11):2278–2324.
  Google Scholar
• 25. Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv [cs.CV]. 2014. http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556. Accessed May 4, 2018.
  Google Scholar
• 26. Takahashi N, Sugimoto M, Psutka SP, Chen B, Moynagh MR, Carter RE. Validation study of a new semi-automated software program for CT body composition analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017;42(9):2369–2375.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells W, Frangi A, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015; 234–241.
  Google Scholar
• 28. Glorot X, Bengio Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2010; 249–256. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v9/glorot10a.html. Accessed November 7, 2017.
  Google Scholar
• 29. Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv [cs.LG]. 2014. http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980. Accessed November 7, 2017.
  Google Scholar
• 30. Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, et al. TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning. In: OSDI. usenix.org, 2016; 265–283. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi16/osdi16-abadi.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2018.
  Google Scholar
• 31. Warfield SK, Zou KH, Wells WM. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004;23(7):903–921.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32. Prado CM, Gonzalez MC, Heymsfield SB. Body composition phenotypes and obesity paradox. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2015;18(6):535–551.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 33. Kutáč P, Gajda V. Evaluation of accuracy of the body composition measurements by the BIA method. Hum Mov Sci 2011;12(1):41–45.
  Google Scholar
• 34. Lowry DW, Tomiyama AJ. Air displacement plethysmography versus dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in underweight, normal-weight, and overweight/obese individuals. PLoS One 2015;10(1):e0115086.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 35. Bachrach LK. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements of bone density and body composition: promise and pitfalls. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13(Suppl 2):983–988.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar